0-0

>0-0
>one team arbitrarily wins
Can somebody explain this to me?

Attached: huh.png (393x195, 19K)

lose weight

They decide it on a minigame

fpbp

>they could've stayed 2nd in groups
>they had better chances against Colombia
>their greed got the best of them
>they could've been preparing at this very moment to play against Chile in semis

Attached: 1403887670_845704_1403887743_noticia_normal.jpg (300x449, 21K)

based toothpaste

anything happening in their "sport" angers and confuses them

>they had better chances against Colombia
lol wut

more like Colombia had more chances with Uruguai, Chile always make us his bitch

Varsinson 2 Urgay 0

Seething mutts

They play a random Mario party game to decide who advances

We have the ultimate superior tiebreaking system that only relies on individual performance within the team

NFL should get rid of ties and do a field goal competition to determine a winner.

>CA quarters
>three 0-0

Wtf bros?

Superior sudaca defenses are too good for those attackers that play in Yurop.

I miss the Mario Retardy days on Yea Forums. Not that I've ever played.

They flip a coin, stupid

They play for fun and don't really care who wins it

I bet 30 bucks your grandpa was turkish

>he thinks penalties are luck
Ultimate pleb filter

Flipping coins is inherently unbalanced. It's not 50:50. It's actually 51:49, with 51% being the face of the coin when facing upwards when you flip it. Furthermore, dimensions, curves and other shit affects it.

Well I didn't make the rules