The UN have no fucking clue

Attached: based.jpg (1120x253, 32K)

based as fuck

Wtf I love Jews now

Do normies see things like this and fall for the propaganda?

I can't imagine how detached from reality one would have to be to not understand that the demand and economics of male and female sports are drastically different and completely justified in paying them differently.

>World champions US Women's Soccer team loses to U15 Dallas boys . jpeg

Every single male top tier player from age 17-21 who gets paid almost nothing is better than the best in women's soccer

literal gawd

More ppl show up for his training than for the women world cup.

>the average annual salary of players in the world's top 7 women's leagues is significantly higher than my own
Yeah, nah. As proletarian I do not feel obliged to support the cause of people better off than me.

Attached: es una vida desesperada.png (1038x557, 795K)

and a competitor in the paralympics makes even less.

This is the real disgrace. Their level of play is higher than the women's.

Messi is at least 1694 times better than them

those leagues have shit tier tv deals (if any) and almost no attendance
they make no money
they would be literally bankrupt if they increased the pay without a corresponding increase in income
why is everyone so fucking stupid?

The sad truth is that it will eventually happen. It already did in tennis

>Messi
know in even the most remost places such as Syria,Banglash and SCotland
>Women footballers
the only who is known someonewhere is that busted pussy bitch and she is only known in the asshole of the internet

>Professional sports players salaries are related to the popularity of their sport, league, team, etc
>Popular player in popular sport in major league gets paid a lot while players in less popular leagues get paid less

Fucking

Shocker

Because tennis is a posh cunt sport played by people who would still live a comfortable life even if they wouldn't get paid at all.
Football is a lower class sport for teenage lads getting drunk at halftime and ghetto kids who see it as a chance to not work or rob gas stops.

Is he, dare I say it, /our jew/?

They should hire better looking girls and make them wear tighter clothes, not those ngubinhas wearing wigs
Female volleyball salaries are not much different from their male counterpart for that exact reason

Wtf I love Jews now

of course you do

>un pushing communist propaganda
how bold

look comfy

>take stupidity being proposed literally
>pay every pro women's soccer player $84 million
>bankrupt world and send it to dark ages

>pay $142.2 billion
>generate $20 million in revenue
excellent sustainable business model

Women didn't even play as long as men, which was the argument. Did they get forced to play as long as men, or did men's games get shorter? If so, fair enough.

everything is Messi's fault now

Attached: 1292428693974.png (368x348, 117K)

Woman supermodels and pornstars earn more money than their male counterparts. But its just because they are victims of patriarchy.

>gatorade does a commercial for the women's world cup
>includes a shot of messi at the end posting positive comments on the internet and nodding his head approvingly
pretty telling about the state of things

>Paying the entire GDP of Kuwait on fucking football
No.

>World cup: 3.2 billion viewers
>Women's world cup: 10 million viewers.
>320 times more viewers
>2.6 billion in profit from world cup
>73 million from women's world cup
>35 times more profitable.
>forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/03/07/world-cup-soccer-pay-disparity-between-men-and-women-is-justified/#64702f1c6da4
>Women get 13% of the profits, men get 9% from their respective cups.

Fucking delusional

you can fool a few dummies here because it's almost in the same galaxy in terms of popularity(at the youth level much more so which is all most of them have experience with and conflate) and they see the women dominating and men mediocre and go "omg wtf no fair!". plus it's just a surface interest to them and something to get outraged about.

apply all that to an emotional head of brain damaged mush, give it a soapbox to scream on(social media), let it reside in the country that pushes world social policy(usa), an overwhelming but apathetic majority(almost out of incredulity) and simply times it by a little as a few thousand in some cases and there you go. you now have an exterme, extreme minority dictating world affairs

I sang in the shower today, why am I not being paid the same amount as One Direction or Drake or Justin Bieber? I kicked a football myself, why am I not being paid the same as Messi or Ronaldo? I did a catwalk strut down the road, why am I not being paid as much as Armando Cabral? I did a performance in my local theatre production, why am I not being paid the same as George Clooney? I cooked some dinner today, why am I not being paid the same as Gordon Ramsay? Come on, these injustices can't fucking last.

If women want to get paid the same as men, start by playing the same sport.
Ladies football is a separate sport, and if that's not true then men should be allowed to play it just as women are allowed to play actual association football.

They are deliberately not looking into how much wealth they produce though, right? Since no one cares about womyns sunday leagues. It has to be intentional at this point.

based jew

Does Lionlel Missi really get 84 mil a year? I can't even fathom that much money

No mention of generated revenue. If it was to be implemented I'm wondering how.
Would there need to be a cap on the earnings of individual players?
Would there be a flat fee paid for games played at each level of the game: club, international?
Either of those would drastically reduce the potential earnings of individual players, top line players, and the revenue they generate would go somewhere so follow the hypothetical money and you'll discover who is behind this push, using women's sports, equality, feminism, as a catspaw.

a million is a thousand thousands :^)

>pulling the anti-semitism card on the leftcucks
BASED

Attached: leftist socialist porn.jpg (1432x1019, 173K)

Nuclear holocaust when?

Ok UN, you pay every footballer 84 mil

This. Whats the point of having more money after you surpassed the 10 million mark?

There's absolutely nothing wrong with being Jewish

>tfw no angry frustrated panty wearing finnish trap gf (male)
Reee

the only women who have a legitimate gripe are the USWNT who actually have the popularity to back up their demands and the fact the men are paid like 5X more to suck 50X harder

the players whining on behalf of these "leagues" have a fundamental misunderstanding of how professional sports work, get butts in the seats and your pay will go up. Messi isn't paid that amount by FIFA, he's paid that by a private club who can afford such finances thanks to ticket sales and merchandise.

W*men absolutely, irredeemably, unequivocally BTFO!

Attached: 1526274313217.png (1000x666, 331K)

If you already own one mountain of gold you'll want another. When you own two, you'll want the valley in between to be filled with gold.

>women want men to provide for them
I'd get this if it was a marriage, but this is ridiculous. Build your sport up yourselves and get women to watch it. They're half the earths population so if men can sustain men's football then women could theoretically dot he same if they cared about it.

Messi is having the stance of pedobear. I find this pretty rude if you ask me.

There is no fucking way Messi makes 84m a year

one male soccer player is more popular than almost all the players in the top 7 women's leagues

Why don't I get paid like Messi to fap to tranny porn? It's not fucking fair

Honestly think messi could dribble past all 1500 dykes.

Nah, most of them kinda see through the bs most of the times, even the women.

>t. have normie friends

Lionel Messi is known by at least one person in every single country on planet Earth. Hell, he's probably known on other planets as well

Based class-conscious kraut

No, I just showed it to the lads in work and they think it's a load of bollocks.

to be honest, Messi could probably take on all the 1.6k women alone and still win, so yeah.

Equal pay would create incentives for improvement though.

He makes more actually

If every United player was on Sanchez wages, would they win the Prem?

I can't see any reason why FIFA couldn't split the prize money 50/50. They arbitrarily set the amounts, not based on viewership or individual licensing.

Pretending not the understand the issue is their favorite thing.

I wonder do messi and TSU care about gender politics like this or even aware of that this is a heated issue these days?

>Gk - STEGEN
>Def - Ramos
>Mid - Messi
>Forward - Ronnie
4 vs the USWNT. what will be the scoreline?

Attached: 1561361105631.jpg (1600x2134, 273K)

If teams have more money to spend then they do better, yes. We've seen that with Chelsea and Man City. At the national level, with womens football, the correlation between the amount of funding and quality of the football is clear.

you need to renew your bait m8

U15 boys should also be paid as much as Messi

Not bait. Just the facts. If FIFA split the money 50/50 then it would barely make a dent in the comfort of the mens players, most of whose money comes from sponsorship etc anyway, but it would be a huge cash injection for the womens game, which would rapidly improve the standard of the sport. FIFA splitting it 50/50 would have a huge positive and literally no downside. There is no good reason not to do this.

Messi doesnt run at all, Ronaldo not much either

see

Which is why we’ll use taxpayer money to achieve this!

If you have an argument then go ahead. If you are afraid to engage with the topic properly then ask yourself why, because that's on you.

No taxpayer money needed. FIFA allocate the prize money how they wish. The call is for that allocation to be 50/50.

All this complaining should be directed squarely at big companies that sponsor sport. Men don't get paid more because they're better, they get paid more because they attract massive multi million sponsorship deals.

If women want to be paid more, they need to be pressuring the organising bodies to attract bigger sponsors, clubs can't pay beyond what they bring in.

The complaint isn't about sponsorship. The main thing we are looking at is FIFA prize money, where the majority of revenue is from broadcasting rights.

its common knowledge that women make more than men do in porn. women make more straight out of the box in porn. they make more doing girl on girl stuff than those poor blokes that do gay for pay when they are just starting out and trying to to make it to eventually get to fuck women and get paid for it and even then they get paid less than the woman.

Ah right. Well yeah, women should get an equal percentage of the broadcasting deal for womens competitions as the men get with theirs. If that's not already the case it needs fixing.

Combining the the two figures and splitting it 50/50 is dumb though.

Why is 50/50 "dumb"? It would have huge benefits for the sport. "dumb" is just a feeling you get about something. I could equally say 50/50 is "fair" but that wouldn't really be an argument. We're really just saying it feels like a good/bad idea at that point.
We should really just ask "is a 50/50 split good for the sport?" and the answer is yes, so FIFA should do it. This is what #equalpay is requesting.

women get a higher cut of the profits from their wc, according to forbes

forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/03/07/world-cup-soccer-pay-disparity-between-men-and-women-is-justified/#6e64f8526da4

Truth

Attached: 1540263531327.png (1341x1319, 986K)

lmao nobody watches wahmen sports, not even other wahmen. Sorry ladies.

friendly reminder that this sort of shit is used to distract you from the real world issues

theres a reason why social media is the tool of the useful idiot

It'd be good for the sport, but not 'deserved' as many are implying. Tbh I'd be happy to see womens football given a financial boost, but it would very much be charity.

market value of the different broadcasting rights is not even close to 50/50 though, what makes it fair?

Fair because the top people in the mens category "should" earn the same as the top in the womens. There's no reason why FIFA should tie prize money allocation to broadcasting rights revenue. They don't currently.

they shouldn't

Do you know of anybody who pays hundreds for a t-shirt with a female player name? Or anybody who pays hundreds to watch a game on the stadium? Or pay to watch their games on TV? By splitting the money you are taking money away from men, who generated that revenue, to give it to women. Women football will never be able to generate as much revenue as men because women don't care about the sport, women will never buy a t-shirt with some female player on it, or attend to the stadium, or watch the game on TV by herself

>implying this website hasn't been a psyop for a while now

Oh, I just realized you are the same soibong that defends this garbage of "sport" in every single thread. You are either a cuck or a roastie

You are confusing two different issues there. Individual licensing and sponsorship is not what is being targeted and not something which FIFA has any control over. With regards watching on TV, the money is not currently split based on this. Morocco got the same amount of money as Germany in the last world cup, even though millions more people tuned in to watch Germany play.
FIFA get to decide how the prize money is allocated. They do not currently do that based on viewership or similar. They do it arbitrarily and they could very easily split 50/50. This would be a huge help in rapidly developing the quality of the womens sport, and barely a scratch in the mens.

Messi sold more T-shirts than the 1693 dykes

Why the fick would they do that when the mens world cup is watched by a couple billion more people than the womens you fucking spacker

see

One can only assume he is getting paid. If not, he might be the most damaged individual on the board.

I like womens football, but they're a million miles away from earning equal pay for internationals. The only countries that can really argue this are USA and Canada since they generate a similar amount of revenue to their mens teams.

I have it's a shit point.

Angelina Jolie mad twice as much money as 2000 of my actor colleagues, we demand equal pay

Based little 4 ft fat jewish man

>nodding his head approvingly
I bet he got paid 10 times more than the women in that clip Kek

he probably got a truck full of cash for doing just that
how expensive can messi be? can't be less than 500k

>the mens sport should finance the womens sport
Why?

So it is confirmed all women can do is live off men?

Ask the sponsors. Ultimately it's their money. Do the chinks want to waste their money on women's soccer?

would you take a pay cut so that the bum living on the street wouldnt starve?

guys. 1 hollywood actress makes as much money as 500 truck drivers. where is the equal pay.

WTF I LOVE JEWS NOW

Why is no one talking about the fact that women's football leagues across the world and this WWC are playing in stadiums built for men's football and the training facilities these women are using are buitl for men too. The ENTIRETY of women's football at the top level is completely subsidised by the men's game. If it wasn't for the men's game they would be playing in fucking grass fields in the local park

why is this not being mentioned? when are women going to pay back half the cost of the stadiums instead of getting to use these facilities for completely free? If I wanted a kick about in a national stadium I couldn't use it so why should these women?

meanwhile plenty of countries in the UN deny women basic human rights. good thing their priorities are in order

>Messi
>can only score against 10 men Huesca
>Can't even win the WC or CL
>misses penalties left right and center
>no iniesta to carry his ass and he still earns 84 gazillion like these 1600 brave women combined and people still suck him off as the best footballer in the world
Why are you handling his decline so poorly?

umm sweatie? have sex

>The ENTIRETY of women's football at the top level is completely subsidised by the men's game.
yep as far as I know(not sure don't care to look it up and I'm sure it's soviet washed from google searches anyway) the us women get money from the us men's to stay afloat. so theyre suing an entity that subsidizes them for more money "cuz no fair"

>thought this was a joke
>it's real
lmao

>Despite receiving 13% of all profits, women actually commit 50% of the bitching and moaning about pay.

Messi probably doesn't even care anymore, but why do something for free? He's Messi, not a trannyjanny

Lol you're wrong. Glad you're certain about it.

> male football stars attract hundreds of millions of viewers, billion dollar sponsorship deals, etc
> female footballers get 100k views on YouTube fail compilations
I wonder why they’re not paid equally lmao

>World cup: 3.2 billion viewers
>Women's world cup: 10 million viewers.
LMFAO

Absolutely based

Only gay ass countries (France, nordic countries, Usa) and countries that suck at real football (England) watch the women's world cup.

>10 million viewers
UK TV ratings were over 8 million for our last game, do we really make up over 80% of viewers for the WWC?

>What is supply and demand?

This must be a joke. The UN can't possibly have people this stupid in charge of their social media accounts.

Thought we were /elite/ bros...

Highly doubt that

Local rating don’t really matter in a “World” Cup though. There are still 100x more people watching the men’s team fail around the world than are watching our women win their tournament

Have sex

That stopped once 6 million of you watched a womens world cup game

Wouldn't forcing women's clubs to pay them the wages of their male counterparts bankrupt them all? How else would they get the additional money? Is the UN offering to pay?

There’s about a 0% chance 8 million people in the UK watched that shit.

this guy nose whats up

it happened only at Grand Slams, where women make 1.5x money per hour than men

but separated WTA and ATP tournametns still make deifferent money

More worthless then the League of Nations at this point

Yes, definitely a good idea to base your world view on conspiracy theories for which not a shred of evidence has ever been produced

i thought the argument was over prize money. is it prize money or generic salaries they're whining about?

let the Women's World Cup winners be paid the same prize money as the mens'. who cares? from that tweet that isn't what they're talking about though, is it? it sounds like they're saying some girl who plays for the Doncaster Belles should be paid the same as Alexi Sanchez.

that's not just insane, it's literally like asking for ice cream to rain down from the sky. who's paying for this shit? are they asking for men to take a massive wage cut, or for some money trees to be found in order to pay women broadly the same as men?

>Men don't get paid more because they're better, they get paid more because they attract massive multi million sponsorship deals.

Attached: 1523927539039.jpg (800x450, 45K)

They are different sports...
The world cup brings in far more revenue and winners earn far more than the rugby world cup, why not split the profits with them?

>these figures were based on those who watched for 5 minutes or more

>literally nobody watches women's football
>it doesn't generate any money
>wtf why aren't we being paid millions every week like the men???

remember the 6 (SIX) million

You cant bring the prize money up in line with the mens though, that would be more than the entire revenue the competition generates.
Half the worlds population watched the mens world cup in Russia and it generates billions in revenue.
Less people watch the womens world cup than watch friends reruns on a random tuesday.

As a percentage of what they generate, women earn almost twice as much as the men already, 13% to under 7%.

There aren't 100 male black actors in porn, the kike who owns blacked can only pay dick surgery for 20 of them.

Based and redpilled

no one watches ma'am's football because the level of the players is really low and i'm not even talking about the fact that they're women, if a chick grows up dreaming to be a football player and works hard she can probably make it, if a guy wants to do the same he has the compete with thousands of kids just for his position.

lower the prize money of the men then.

at least it will kill off that part of the argument. then their retarded arguments about generic wage equality can be the focus instead of prize money.

youtube.com/watch?v=NYqpz-0-Zgg
BASED

KEK

Underrated yet quality post

>Capitalist institutions decide wages through mixture of market rates and collective bargaining
>Capitalist institutions cry foul that less profitable women’s sports occupied by semi-pros whose labor is worth less than Messi’s

Can we just admit we want to make people actively seek out a lower rate for their labor to justify social justice.

Can /pol/ now admit that “leftism” is not Marxist?

Lowering the mens prize money is fine for England, USA, Germany and any other rich nations but it would cripple lower tier nations.

The day the mens prize money is lowered to that level is the day we will never see an African or Asian team get beyond the groups.
Teams from really small nations wouldn't even be able to travel, they would have to pull out entirely.

>Morocco got the same amount of money as Germany in the last world cup
How much do they get paid outside the world cup? Seems unfair to compare something that's basically a prize for entering the biggest, most popular sports event in the world with something as regular as a salary.

FIFA doesn't decide the prize money for the rugby world cup.

It is precisely that prize money which is being campaigned about.

Not true. FIFA allocates the prize money, not the sponsors.

To improve the sport.

It directly addresses the issue of viewership which you brought up. Read it again.

The funny thing is that the women have a combined 7 world cups and messi’s Bitch ass has none.

>It is precisely that prize money which is being campaigned about.
What's being campaigned about are unequal wages, period. Not the wc prize money specifically. That's why they're suing USSF and not FIFA, you know, the guys who handle the wwc.
goal.com/en-us/news/uswnt-players-sue-us-soccer-for-gender-discrimination/l6cy1j1a65cm1uqaval9phk31

FIFA control the prize money.

Duh? Did you not read my post? If you're claiming that the prize money is the thing being campaigned about (it's not), why are they suing USSF and not FIFA then?

You're referring to an action by the US womens team, not the worldwide equal pay campaign which has been focused on FIFA money allocation. Obviously the equal pay campaign isn't focused on the USSF which only affects American women.

Lionel Messi makes 84 times the money in one year than I will in a lifetime. Where is the campaign for my equal pay? Or is this another double standards thing?
t. construction worker guy who plays football in 9001. division

The hell? I thought the US women's team were the only ones who "deserved" it since the rest of the world doesn't give a damn about women's football? They're the ones making a big deal about this today to the point of suing.

By "worldwide campaign" you mean this?
twitter.com/UN/status/1142915986993164293
I don't see anything about WC prize money there, only regular salaries, which is what I was talking about about how it's unfair to compare to the former.

>muh equal pay

i 100% support women getting equal pay, as soon as they start performing equal work, and not whatever the fuck this shit is

Attached: Greatest goal never scored.webm (1280x720, 2.96M)

Your misunderstanding of the campaign is quite severe, to the point where I think you're probably deliberately not understanding it. If you were really thinking the following
>Equal pay campaigners want the US team to be paid the same as men but not any other team as only the US team deserve it
then just a tiny bit of common sense would have let you know that this wasn't the case. You have now moved to apparently thinking that a worldwide campaign is accurately denoted by a single tweet. It isn't.

That is literally the argument I've seen everywhere, the fact that, because the women's team outperforms the male team, they deserve higher pay which supposedly compensates for the lower revenue caused by the lower popularity.

>You have now moved to apparently thinking that a worldwide campaign is accurately denoted by a single tweet. It isn't.
It's literally the tweet that this thread was about, remember ? You deliberately changed the topic to FIFA wc prize money when the argument was about salaries.

You've seen an argument everywhere that women's football should be horribly underfunded apart from the US national team? Come on. No you haven't.

Yeah. The thread is about one tweet. And I've chosen to talk about the wider issue the tweet is addressing. This shouldn't come as a huge shock.

>You've seen an argument everywhere that women's football should be horribly underfunded apart from the US national team?
I'm sure the people in question WANT there be pay equality worldwide, but they usually aren't as naive as to think it's that simple and use it as an actual argument. People realize viewership and revenue are a thing. What they claim is that because the american women's team does better in women's football, they deserve higher pay, period. Another argument I've seen is that it would lead to football growing the US and would be a successful investment over time.
> And I've chosen to talk about the wider issue the tweet is addressing.
The OP is addressing salaries, the post you replied to was also addressing salaries, it has nothing to do with the FIFA wc price money, your whole argument was about using the latter to argue against the former. It just seems dishonest to me.

How is "wealth redistribution" and other fag shit like that not marxist?

>the greatest player in the history of the entire sport deserves to be paid the same as a fat 5'2" goalkeeper who has a career total of 6 saves and 340 goals conceded

Ultimately, yes full equality is the aim.
>people realise viewership and revenue are a thing
You are wrong here though. Money to players is completely independent of viewership, as I've covered earlier.

>blatantly pushes the goalie
>grabbing onto other player
is womens football real

Attached: huh.jpg (480x259, 27K)

Poast it

No way. Wwc is bigger than mens in the USA.

>UN advocating for socialism
So when is it time to pull the plug on this failed LoN 2.0?

Norwegian TV ratings were also over 8 million for our last game against Australia.

Which is strange, because our population is only 5.2 million.

Mr Marx I thought you were dead

Why do they think this is an argument. Just compare attendance to wwc and an average camp nou match (since they are using messis or Pique as their example). How are you gonna compare them. Soccer players earn according to their exposure. Like fuck I cant name more than like 4 of our female players, but you bet none of them bring revenue like pulisic does.

Attached: 1541084199436.gif (500x385, 859K)

The usa mex hex games get more viewers

>everyone who earns more than me is the enemy
the fucking state of gommunists
no wonder you never accomplished anything.

>is womens football real
real shit

Attached: greatest goal ever scored.webm (1280x720, 2.77M)

Could Messi dab on 1700 women football players at the same time?

I wish I was jewish, lads.

Messi also wins twice as much as every male player in the Argentine League, why dont we demand so every football player in the world wins the same as Messi?
Oh right, because that is not how money and economics work.
Those fucking imbesils

Economics is a type of dark witchcraft created by evil white men.

You're all WHITE FILTHY NAZIS

Shitty bitches making you laugh on a pitch is the new thing, I mean every newspaper talks about those tohs. Come on now, ETERO MALES, it's the year of the women's desktop now.

wtf some retards are actually paying 42,6 million a year to 1693 women to play sunday league level football?????