Which is better?

1. Djokovic
2. Federer
3. Nadal

>loses h2h
>would not even smell a RG if not for Nadal's injuries and someone else eliminating him
>beats you at wimbeldon in your prime
>cries and throws tantrums at RG for years
federritors are cancer

Federer obviously
Not a one GS babby
Nadal:
12 RG, 2 AO, 2 USO, 2 WIMB, 0 ATP FINALS

Fed:
1 RG, 6 AO, 5 USO, 8 WIMB, 6 ATP FINALS

take away hard courts and Federer has 9 slams.
take clay courts and Rafa has 6 slams.

not that different, and Nadal is 5 years younger, he will probably end up with more slams

>Most H2H happened on clay because Nadull was too shit out of clay to reach semis or finals while Federer was good enough on clay to reach semis or finals

Nadal has 3 US opens

AND DESPITE BEING ONLY 13% OF THE TOURNAMENTS IT REPRESENTS 80% OF HIS TITLES

Opponents in slam finals won by Nadal:
Feder: 6 times
Djokovic: 4 times
Thiem: 2 times
Wawrinka, Kevin Anderson, Ferrer, Berdych, Soderling, Puerta: 1

Attached: 1554467249341.jpg (250x250, 8K)

I never realised Nadal never won the ATP finals

>Federer
GOAT Tennis player
>Nadal
GOAT Clay Court Tennis player

Attached: 1453959107867.png (476x372, 21K)

>Statistically had the easiest path to a slam title in the whole Open Era in his last US Open win
wow

Opponents in slam finals won by Federer:

Rodick: 4
Murray: 3
Nadal: 3
CIilic: 2
Agassi, Soderling, Djokovic, Safin,Baghdatis, Gonzalez, Phillipouisis, Hewitt: 1

Federer never got clowned by Brown, is better all surface and less likely roided

Djokovic will end up surpassing both if he remains more or less healthy for the next 3-4 years. The Serb is also the more complete player and, unlike Federer, he has won the FO more than once.

>12 of them on clay by the best clay player of all time

Attached: kek.png (1005x424, 80K)

>Nadal won against 3 slams winners
>Federer won against 8 slams winners
Thanks for proving Federer is the GOAT

muh finals, they don't go straight in the finals bucko

>le get injured during 8 months until clay season man

>unlike Federer, he has won the FO more than once.
'no'

Career Grand Slam at age of 24 vs age of 27

>true GOAT
why he never dominated grass as nadal dominates clay?

I think so too.
I am a Nadal fan, my ideal slam total scenario would be >Nadal>Djoko>Federer., but I think in the end Djoko>Nadal>Federer will happen.

I also prefer Djoko>Federer>Nadal to Federer>Djkoko>Nadal.

Federer doesn't deserve ending up above the other two, only because he was lucky to be play with shitters until he was 26yo

Federer, because Nadal is a closet homo.

Attached: s-l400.jpg (400x283, 20K)

>Rodick: 4
>Murray: 3
:^)

I think Djoko will average 2 slams a year for the next 3, and then maybe 1 or 2 more, ending up at 22/23.
Nadal can still win 2/3 Roland Garros, he needs 1/2 non-RG slams!!!!!!!!!!!!

link?

atptour.com/en/performance-zone/win-loss-index/career/all/all/

thanks!

muh weak era

>Nadal and Fed are basically the same on hard and grass
>Nadal rapes Fed on clay
>This means that Fed is better
???

>Fed 8 Wimbledon titles, roidal 2
>equal on grass

They're 2-1 on grass against each other, and if Nadal didn't get hurt in 2009 it would be 2-2

Fed is 2-1*

So head to head determines the better player and not titles and results vs the field. I suppose dustin brown is a better grass court player than nadal because of his superior head to head despite never reaching the 4th round. You absolute brainlet.

heh

Given the a strong sample size? Yes it does. This is a one on one sport. We can directly determine who is better by them playing each other

6 Of weak era

A one on one sport played on different surfaces and in vastly different conditions. Fed leads head to head on hard and grass, nadal on clay. Same goes with djokovic and nadal. So is Nadal the worst of the 3?

Djokovic leads both on H2H, and Nadal leads Fed, so in your scenario Fed is the worst of the 3

>reading comprehension

I don't understand your point. Your separating the surfaces to try and give players you favor an advantage. Every surface is as valid as the next.

Isnt it funny how messi/ronaldo and the 3 tennis players are probably not gonna be surpassed anymore

Makes me proud I was a contemporary of the GOATs

People who watched Pele and Sampras thought the same

Checked
But im just pretty sure we hit the human limit

So Federer is best

Thiem will be better than both

>25
>1 real title
>64% win rate

That's why the next GOAT will be a pacy black guy

there really is no argument against Federer being the goat of goats unless you start geting into mental gymnastics because you support nadal or djokovic

>Image
Roger the goat

>nadal
>longevity
Kek

No one cares

why does he have worse h2h against both?