Clay court is the patrician court

clay court is the patrician court

>he thinks any other court matters
>muh grass court

kys. If you can't win on clay, then you could never play tennis in the first place

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-12 at 19.33.26.png (934x614, 708K)

I think they're all good in their way, but it's aways felt to me that hard court is like "default" tennis, and the other two are variations. Clay is fun though, I like it more than grass.

kys faggot clay is the only one that matters

This is a opinion I can agree on and
is a guy with a very small peepee.

>(You)

Attached: tennis_autism.webm (720x720, 2.86M)

>subhuman moonballers are patrician
k

this has been settled a long time ago, you tit

Attached: surf.jpg (970x155, 43K)

clay just makes frauds like nadal with steroid defense relevant. think about it. nadal would be murray level if it wasn't for clay

Everyone knows that carpet is the thinking man’s surface

Attached: D02F87CA-A45C-4A5C-B43C-A4A1A764A406.jpg (683x1024, 100K)

Attached: Screenshot 2019-01-16 at 04.04.27.png (920x766, 175K)

I know literally jack shit about tennis so I prefer grass because green is a prettier color

grass is just a bitch for upkeep. kind of wish there were more grass courts around

>players he's lost to in a final
Federer 3x (2 grass + 1 hard)
Djokovic 4x (1 grass, 3 hard)
Wawrinka 1x (hard)

You can can say this about a lot of guys, but if not for the the other members of the "big 3" he'd be almost as dominant off clay as on it.

It always pisses me off watching Wimbledon where the grass turns to dirt all along the baseline by the later rounds.

clay>hard>grass

don't @me

why dont they just fix it?

@93391367
But what if you're right?

Who isn't able to win Roland Garros is a fraud

...

For me, clay is main surface, because when i occasionnaly saw the tennis on TV in early age, it was always clay(late spring time).

when i first time saw hard, i disliked it looks. Unnatural unfalttering blue, its not normal, it looks... uncomfortable

List the advantages and disadvantages of each surface

Why does Nadal always win on clay?

Simona the cutest

Clay is slowest(vary from fast clay to slow clay), Grass is fastest(some hard are fast too)

Also, clay is most healthy(its good for joints) while hard is least healthy(bad for joints).


>Why does Nadal always win on clay?
Good physique(power and stamina), good brain, lots of training, really lots and lots since young age, strong will and determination for 15+ years of permanent successes

Why is he worse(a little bit) than Federer and Djokovic on grass and hard? idk. Probably, a bit worse reflexes(bounce on clay is slow(but sometimes unpredicatable) so you have more time to adjust a stroke) than those two.