Federer was the french open final away from winning grand slam but he managed to bottle it after winning the first two...

>federer was the french open final away from winning grand slam but he managed to bottle it after winning the first two sets 6-0 and 6-3

lmao i didn't even know this, what a loser

Attached: 1554231255428.jpg (228x221, 14K)

what? he has a career grand slam if that's what you mean

What? That sentance makes no sense and Fed has never lost in the french open after winning the first two sets

ESL detected.

How can Federer be the "GOAT" if he is inferior to Nadal?

>Have been playing each other since 2004 when Federer was already matured through a rivalrly against Nalbandian while Nadal was young
>Federer and Rafael Nadal have played 39 times, with Federer trailing 15–24
>Federer would not have a French Open (and Career Grand Slam) if it wasn't for the Swede Soderling
>Nadal won 6 of 9 finals played against each other

if Nadal wasn't 5 years younger than Feder it would be a completely different story. He even demolished Federer in their first ever match in 2004 being only 17 years old.

Nadal just relys on clay

Nadal has always been a roidhead

>federer was the french open final away from winning grand slam

Attached: images.jpg (259x194, 8K)

Nadal has a better record in outdoor hard courts and has beaten Federer at Wimbledon, they even held a special match to make a court half grass half clay and Nadal still won. The ONLY reason Federer is relevant today is because of age.

Isn’t Brown better than Nadal?
He’s undefeated against him.