"""""""offside"""""""

Not offside at all, Holland's Nigger RB is keeping him onside, it's clear.

basato

refball

Attached: 1559853371596.jpg (1536x2048, 673K)

>american geometry

based

yup

not an argument
the fact that they didn't ever put the incident from a flat perspective(as they should) doesn't help UEFA's image either

nice curved tv lad

yep

Attached: 1559853371596.jpg (1536x2048, 675K)

That's the way UEFA showed the replay.
They never put it from a flat perspective because they've gone full jew at this point.

Just look at the many offsides todays that weren't signaled by the linesman immediately, every time they were waiting to see if it would be a goal or not before raising the flag. Disgusting.

Attached: 1559853371596.jpg (1536x2048, 688K)

lol

dumdums

Attached: 1559856632075.jpg (1920x1080, 314K)

>that line
ahahahhahahaha

Gebaseerd

wow, you're great in paint

That's because the VAR can check it you brainlet, linesmen have to wait with raising their flag.
I didn't think this was offside but apparently it was.

PhD in footballing scoence

Lines are clearly inaccurate

>"""VAR"""
youtube.com/watch?v=z6VlZvAjsD8

basiert

>I didn't think this was offside but apparently it was.
You'll eat a turd sandwich if UEFA tells you mate.
Both teams were meh today but England would have probably won if it wasn't disallowed.

>putting lines down means he was off!
UEFA and other confederations don't show you a good honest side-on view precisely so they can swing things like this whichever way they want.

>UEFA and other confederations don't show you a good honest side-on view precisely so they can swing things like this whichever way they want.
Any person with a triple digit IQ can figure this out.
See for an extreme example where they even co-operated with Juve cameramen to not even ever show the goal go in from a zoomed in perspective.
It's ridiculous the shit they do nowadays.

But it was rightfully disallowed, they had computer technology for offside in this game so even though barely, it was offside. That the picture doesn't make it clear means it could have been offside and apparently it was.

this may have been indeed a malfunction from the goal line tech.

>""""""""""Malfunction"""""""""" in favour of perhaps the most infamous cheaters in football
It's never a coincidence when it happens to Juventus.

No i think its De Ligt

Attached: images.png (196x257, 5K)

>But it was rightfully disallowed
It clearly wasn't

>they had computer technology
Which means jackshit because it's all in how it's used.
At the end of the day the officials are the ones who decide anyways.

This would have never ever been an offside in the pre-VAR days.
Now with VAR they can sell you shit on a stick and you'll believe it.

VAR is a powerful match-fixing tool.

kek

Polish intellectual

Well yeah since it was barely offside it probably would hardly ever been called pre-VAR but never is a stretch. And there've been plenty of mistakes made regarding offside pre-VAR aswell. The VAR might be flawed but it's stil an improvement.

Basado y redpillinho

Oh Hanz, why'd you murder my son?

>since it was barely offside
How do you know this?
You simply blindly believe in the technology, because it "can't" be wrong. Even though humans are still tasked with using it.
There is no good angle we can see and it's so close that nobody can actually tell if it was onside or offside. This is on purpose. It would be trivially easy to have side-on cameras for offside decisions, but they don't because it reduces their ability to control outcomes.