Rank them

1. Fed
2. Djoker
3. Clay babby

clay is the most demanding surface though, clay titles should count for two.
Plus there's 3 fast surfaces slams for Djoko and Federe to statpad

Is this the thread?

Nadal beat Federer at his peak, on clay, grass and hard court

Y'all still COPING after 10 years. Lmao I thought Federer finally beating balding, cannot run, cannot pull off topsin forehand, no intensity Nadal would finally let you get over his winning record over Roger in GS in all but grass. Apparently not

this is the thread
this one title is fucked

And only reason Federer still has winning record on grass is because they never met again after Nadal peaked

Interesting stat- since Nadal and Djokovic hit world no 1 for first time, Federer has beaten them just once (1) each in GS

1.Federer

9001.Anyone else

>calling in the rain so we can rewatch what happened in the Nadal match
Blessed

Attached: gargoyles-notre-dame-cathedral.jpg (760x411, 70K)

> what happened in the Nadal training session

Fixed that

Nadal beat prime Federer on Grass. Just because Fed statpadded in the weakest era in the history of the sport doesn't mean he's the GOAT

Nadull is a clay babby who won Wim because faggot brits were jealous of Roland-Garros and also wanted their Federer-Nadal finals and slowed down as fuck the grass

Nadal vs Federer

5-0 at French Open
3-1 at Australian Open
1-2 at Wimbledon (only because they never met again after Nadal peaked)

Federer's been avoiding him at USO for a decade, squandering match points and whatnot

But sure Nadal is "only" a clay specialist

Youngest to win all 4. And Federer would never even have won all 4 but for Nadal being injured and Soderling fluking it for a couple of years

But Fed fans still COPING after the comprehensive defeats after a decade lmao

Nadal leads Fed on hard court buddy

Based pajeet

20 > 17

weak era

20(TWENTY)

Attached: 1515998614972.jpg (1536x1404, 505K)

Nadal is the GOAT everyone knows it but we pretend we don't or we can't play who's the GOAT

>Federer is avoiding him
>most H2H played on clay
GIT GUD

So is this recent one where all the good players are in their 30s.

>Current era
>Any fucking good
lmao

In fact only reason Federer still holds the slams record is because of Nadal's maaany injuries

Came back 3 times from obscurity to reclaim world no 1 status. 2013 USO beating Prime Novak on hard court, probably one of the greatest comebacks ever

Meanwhile anytime Nadal or Djokovic get injured Federer, quickly reclaims no 1 without actually beating them....

Federer truly is GOAT
G- Greatest
O- Opportunist of
A- All
T- Time

who cares Djokovic stomps both

Nobody likes Djoko and fair enough but he is probably going to have the best claim after he's done.

What does that have to do with anything?

>Nadull plays an extremely physical game
>hurr durr so unlucky to be injurrrred

how do justify nadal roiding?

This

Federer came when 90s goats were past their prime. He just swooped in like a vulture to beat up on boomer players and mediocre gen x compatriots

When he played a real player his age, like Nadal's, he got his ass kicked head to head

>nobody likes Djoko
the fuck, he's the most likeable of the 3

>b-but Fed beat weak players to win slams
>Nadal won against fucking Anderson the US open after having the easiest road to a final ever

>And only reason Federer still has winning record on grass is because they never met again after Nadal peaked
>1-2 at Wimbledon (only because they never met again after Nadal peaked)
Actually it's because Nadal unironically lost to players ranked outside the top 100 4 years in a row.

Look at the indian guy in this thread, nobody stans for Novak that hard.

Last match on clay in GS in 2011. After that Federer started skipping the clay court season altogether for years, giving up all hope lmao

Not that he fared better on hard against any kind of non injured Rafa. No wonder he's been running from Rafa in pretty much all slams for years now till he suddenly realized Rafa can't run, can't pull off the topsin forehand, doesn't even wear sleeveless or have hair, doesn't make music videos with Shakira anymore

Nadal is a medical miracle at this point from all the accumulated injuries and STILL beating Djokovic, still world no 1 or thereabouts. Amazing

1. murray
power gap
2. the rest

“Uninjured Nadal is still undefeated” is just a meme, lad. Not meant to be taken unironically and at face value.

Who did Fed beat in his first 3 Wimbledon wins?

Attached: The-Boodles-Tennis-Event.jpg (1024x1001, 98K)

>a medical miracle
roids aren't what we can call medical

Maybe being a staunch feminist was the real grand slam all along.

Reminder dr fuentes gave nadal the same roids that contador and the spain NT got

Fed did bageleld Nadal on clay, grass and hard courts. Fed bagaeld Djok on hard, and the only person to ever bagel the Fed was Ralph Nadul on clay.

youtube.com/watch?v=TE_84c9Us6s

>Hewitt
>Roddick
>Literally the 2 best players after him at that time
>Also beat Sampras

no CYGS

>Sampras
Old
>Hewitt
>Roddick
Exactly

man federer at his peak was something else.
insane to think neither of them are at their peaks now, and they're still winning because of how weak the younguns are.

> Federer beat pre teen / early 20s barely adult Nadal and Djokovic a few times hurr durr

rafter has 3-0 record vs baby Federer, proving that he is totally better than peak Roger..

Face it lad peak Nadal/Djokovic circa 2010- early 2014 could only be beaten by each other, unless they were injured. Roger around this time in the actual Big 4 era proper, won fewer slams than Murray and Wawrinka

>>Sampras
>Old

>Nadull is on a 5 losses streak against 34+ years old Federer

05' 06' 07' Roger is the best player ever by far

Pajeet, you need to face the fact that Djokovic shits all over Nadull at his peak, and that Federer is 5 years older than Nadull (and 6 years older than Djokovic). He still managed to beat Nadal in 5 sets at the AO, which says something about his mastery. But Djokovic looks like he's going to be the GOAT.
However as things stand it's still 20 > 17 > 15, with Djokovic looking like he'll destroy all opposition by the end of next year.

2010-2014 Djokovic and Nadal were 23/24 - 27/28
2010-2014 Federer was 29-33

And Federer beat Djokovic plenty of times during that period including 2011 RG and 2012 Wimbledon.

Also this 05-07 Fed was something else

Roger Federer - Ralph Nadul Wimbledon 2006 -Grass
Roger Federer - Ralph Nadul Hamburg 2007 -Clay
Roger Federer - Ralph Nadul World Tour Finals 2011 -Hard
Roger Federer - Novak Cincinnati 2012 -Hard
Pajeet I think you had your (You)s, now shoo and leave tennis to people that understand it. tvm

> Federer best in an era where Ivan Ljubicic, Baghdatis reach world no 3 and Gonzalez reached finals

Top kek

Djokovic MAY be better than Nadal but Rafa beat him in 2013 USO and 2012,2014 FO even at his best

And overall please, the hth record is nothing like "shits all over him" unlike Rafa v Roger, or post 2011 Djoker vs Roger

Laver still GOAT.
Winning "the most majors" is a meme record because it has been held by multiple players over time (including Emerson).
The most special thing, the greatest achievement in the sport, is to win the Calendar Year Grand Slam.
And that, lads, has only been done by Laver and Graf.
And that's why they are still my undisputed GOATs.

Djokovic is 21-9 against Nadal on hard/grass. That IS shits all over him.

>Fed being good at 34 means everyone should
It's called an outlier

The reaching is absurd. One might as well talk about 17 yo Nadal beating peak Federer on hard court in their first meeting

Face it Roger is great against the likes of Roddick but is outclassed by peak Nadal and Novak to the point you have to go googling for scraps outside GS

>Nadul
>Not even half the weeks as World #1 as Federer

>Nadal beat Federer at his peak, on clay, grass and hard court

Nadal beat peak feds mostly on Clay. Federer for the most part had the advantage in other courts. Let's not act like they're peers either. Nadal peaked when Fed was starting to decline.

>Lmao I thought Federer finally beating balding, cannot run, cannot pull off topsin forehand, no intensity Nadal would finally let you get over his winning record over Roger in GS in all but grass.

I think his head to head would be better if Nadal didn't avoid or fake injuries when he has to face him. Come on at least Fed gave him a chance when he was pushing 30 while Madal was in his peak.

Because Nadal's prime wasn't in a weak era

>prime
>Can't be #1
Nice prime faggot

>because of Nadal's maaany injuries
>implying durability isn't the defining quality of all-time great athletes

Except he was number 1 retard

>Face it Roger is great against the likes of Roddick but is outclassed by peak Nadal and Novak to the point you have to go googling for scraps outside GS

Just because the competitions don't suit your view doesn't mean they're not imbecile.

federer, nadal, djokovic as in career and legacy
djokovic, nadal, federer in current level

This chutiya is just stirring up his plan B of Rafa wankfest because Liverpool won the CL so he can't say shit

You know it's interesting you should talk about 05-07 Federer as best ever. The reality is that the courts were slowed down just enough around 2003 onwards for Federer to suddenly start winning against "shot places" like Hewitt and Nalbandian after a disastrous losing record vs both earlier. Although Hewitt being injured for about a year when Federer "peaked" And Nalby quickly becoming bloated certainly helped. Safin was injured for all or most of 2003 as I recall, he was the only other "power player " Who could have benefited and he got injured again right after his proper comeback to the top at AO 2005. Kuerten's career literally ended with injuries as Federer's began, though not before knocking him out at FO for old time's sake. JC Ferrero after FO win, USO final, AO semi, got injured crucially just before a FO for which he was favourite

It's telling that Agassi made a GS final after all these

People tend to forget the circumstances of Federer's "rise" to the top

And then there was Roddick, who inspite of being the utter pushover that he was and probably the most limited world no 1 of all time, would probably still have won more on 90s-2002 courts where fast, risky play actually counted and certainly big serves dominated

You can tell the age of most Federer fans when they miss out on these important details. There's a reason I say peak Agassi was better than peak Federer

He never stayed very long at the top

First time seeing an Indian Nadal dicksucker desu.

>Roidalfags resorting to the injuries and "hard era" excuse
Yikes. Come back when he has more slams than Olderer, let alone more weeks at number 1.
The fact is Nadull is the GCBOAT, the greatest clay babby of all time. His RG record will never be broken. BUT
>not winning a SINGLE year end masters tournament
There's really no excuse. Djokovic held all four Grand Slams, beat Fed in Wimbledon, beat Nadull in RG, AND won the year-end masters (aka the fifth Grand Slam) multiple times. At this stage all he needs is to equal Nadull or Fed's GS total and he's the undisputed GOAT.

Attached: 1420759831923.png (464x450, 59K)

Apparently others not being fit and having play styles not suitable against fed is federers fault now.

By that logic all of Roidals injuries are misfortunes that befell upon as well.

Because it's a strong era

>Nadal beat peak feds mostly on Clay. Federer for the most part had the advantage in other courts. Let's not act like they're peers either. Nadal peaked when Fed was starting to decline.

Yes I remember Federer's "decline" When Nadal beat the world no 1 at Wimbledon to snatch the world no 1 ranking from him. Incidentally Federer recovered the ranking the moment Nadal got injured, though not before a comprehensive loss at the AO final

How delusional can you be, Federer was at his "peak" till at least 2012, Nadal and Djokovic were simply better. There was no fall in Fed's level, Nadal and Djoker just improved and admittedly courts got slower

>I think his head to head would be better if Nadal didn't avoid or fake injuries when he has to face him. Come on at least Fed gave him a chance when he was pushing 30 while Madal was in his peak

Nadal beat 26-27 yo Fed at Wimbledon and Aus, he also beat 22 yo Fed as a 17 yo on hard court in their first meeting ever. Face it Nadal is just better or at least uniquely suited to beating Roger. Denying Nadal's comprehensive winning record vs Roger is just making you look like an imbecile

Djokovic is first, and I hate to admit it, and I am in my early 30s, I have seen Federer all his career.
Djokovic is like a cyborg tennis machine.

Uniquely suited to beating Federer is true, because of his heavy topspin left handed backhand being very effective against Federer's one handed backhand.
But I don't think Nadal is better than Federer, because Nadal was a lot more vulnerable to being beaten, sometimes badly, in fast surfaces, and not necessarily by a top 5 player.

No, it just shows that Federer became number one the moment all the old number ones got injured - Safin, Kuerten, Hewitt, Ferrero or the Courts slowd down to his advantage in the case of shot placers like Nalby and Hewitt or Agassi simply becoming too old to run (and some chronic back issues).

It shows Roger had an easy ride to the top. Hence "Weak Era".Roger was the least of all the post-Sampras prodigies but fate truly smiled on him, as it has ever since. Like I said GOAT (Greatest Opportunist of all time)

>Yes I remember Federer's "decline" When Nadal beat the world no 1 at Wimbledon to snatch the world no 1 ranking from him. Incidentally Federer recovered the ranking the moment Nadal got injured, though not before a comprehensive loss at the AO final
>How delusional can you be, Federer was at his "peak" till at least 2012, Nadal and Djokovic were simply better

Yes he was declining lad. Everyone else has shown you where his peak was and he most definitely wasn't at his peak till 2012. Your delusions are funny especially how you excuse his failure to stay fit.

>Face it Nadal is just better or at least uniquely suited to beating Roger. Denying Nadal's comprehensive winning record vs Roger is just making you look like an imbecile

Uniquely suited yes but despite that his comprehensive record is mostly just in clay. That Speaks volumes about this clay babby who crashed out in various surfaces and avoiding fed even during his "peak".

Djokovic is better than Roidall by far and he is a much more complete player to boot.

wow, it's a poo-off.

>No, it just shows that Federer became number one the moment all the old number ones got injured - Safin, Kuerten, Hewitt, Ferrero or the Courts slowd down to his advantage in the case of shot placers like Nalby and Hewitt or Agassi simply becoming too old to run (and some chronic back issues).

And Nadull is uniquely placed to take advantage of play courts but no one jokes that against him. You act like their injuires permenantly nerfed those players which isn't the case. Fed beat them before and after their injuries.

Rogers ride to the top looks easy because he made it look easy. Even a declining olderer was able to stop Djokovic's unbeaten run where he raped Rafa left and right.

Federer
>20 GS (RECORD)
>310 weeks at number 1 (RECORD)
>237 consecutive weeks at number 1 (RECORD)
>RECORD for consecutive quarters, semis, and finals
>6 year-end masters (RECORD)

Nadal
>17 (soon 18) GS
>196 weeks at number 1 (far from even Djokovic)
>0 (ZERO) year-end masters

I don't even need to go on

This.

Fucking Indian tennis fans the fucking pits

Federer > the rest

Fred
Nolan
Ned

FEDERER WAS, IS AND WILL BE THE GOAT FOREVER

>Yes he was declining lad.
Federer was 26, world no 1 going for 6th consecutive wimby, won his 5th consecutive USO and reached 4th Aus final in 6 years (semi at least each year) shortly after, when Nadal beat him to take the mantle of World no 1 at Wimbledon 2008

Use his brains for once, low caste street shitting australoid

>You act like their injuires permenantly nerfed those players which isn't the case. Fed beat them before and after their injuries.
Yes they ruined the players, never quite the same again. Literally ended Kuerten's career, virtually ended Safin and Ferrero as top level threats. Federer never beat Hewitt or Nalbandian till they got injured and/or fat

>Even a declining olderer was able to stop Djokovic's unbeaten run where he raped Rafa left and right.
Federer got lucky in one match, he's been largely less than a speed bump subsequently. Nadal beat Djokovic in 2010 USO, lost 2011 Wimbledon and USO, 2012 Australian Open, won at 2012,2013,2014 RG and 2013 USO, finished 2013 as world no 1 during Novak peak

As usual the desperate reaching to attempt to create an argument where only failure exists, much like Federer in a 5 setter with match point against any opponent worth his salt

Well anyway I guess we'll find out who's better again shortly.... lemme guess " Hurr durr clay" "But he's 37! " Whatever.

The funny thing is I'm actually a Novak fan, although not yet convinced he's the GOAT, hope he shows that this time at RG, but to not give Nadal his due for literally knocking off Federer off his fucking perch is just disingenuous

I get it, the casuals who watched too many Rolex ads and felt their inner homo awakening after the puke worthy custom made golden tuxes can't help but swallow the propaganda and Fed's dick like the plebs they are

The rest of us, whove watched tennis since the '90s know Federer would lose to peak Novak and Rafa on ANY surface, as indeed he would to peak Pete and Andre on any 90s surface. And deep down, almost as deep as Federer's dingus in their mouths even the Fedtards know that he can't match them at their best

The measure of a champion is his rivals and Federer honestly isn't even in the reckoning by this measure.

You don't realise that the average tennis player has been getting better and better ever since the 50's because improvements in sport medicine and training methods. Someone like Thiem would arguably wipe past greats if they played the current game.
Tennis players are a product of their era and Federer was the literal peak of the Late 90's to 10' era. Djokovic and Nadal are similar players that came after Roger's generation, they're more comparable to each other, and their game isn't as aesthetically pleasing or as rounded out as Roger's. Rafa and Novak have been so dominant this decade, but their time is ending. Their style of tennis is also on the decline. You see a lot more youngsters now with one handed backhands doing well. I expect these kind of players to dominate the next generation of tennis
Tldr;The GOAT required stopping from 2 of the all the time greats otherwise he would have 30+ titles.

Federer
.

>Federer was 26, world no 1 going for 6th consecutive wimby, won his 5th consecutive USO and reached 4th Aus final in 6 years (semi at least each year) shortly after, when Nadal beat him to take the mantle of World no 1 at Wimbledon 2008

Yes that's because he was so good that he was winning even in his decline. Why that concept so hard for you to grasp?

>Yes they ruined the players, never quite the same again. Literally ended Kuerten's career, virtually ended Safin and Ferrero as top level threats. Federer never beat Hewitt or Nalbandian till they got injured and/or fat

Funny Fed himself has gone through injuries but came back just as good. Also Hewitt performed well in multiple slams only being beaten by fed even after his injury.

But to you they declined precisely because they lost to fed. Can't argue with a low IQ dumbfuck slum dweller.

>Federer got lucky in one match, he's been largely less than a speed bump subsequently.

"Lucky" is that what you call completely outclassing Djokovic and he has beaten him multiple times after that as well despite being "too old" to be playing tennis at this high a level.

FedGOAT
>
>
Nadal
>
>
>
>
SHIT
>
>
The serb whos faking his whole pn pitch personalty because he wants to be loved like the other two

did he become 1st the moment spains roid program kicked in which also helped their cyclists and footballers ??

1. Djoko
2. Federer
3. Nadal

Damn tennis sounds like serious business
For me it's Federer btw

As it currently stands:
>Federer
>Djokovic
>Nadal
But by the end of their careers:
>Djokovic
>Federer
>Nadal

djokobot and it's not even close
he owns both of these frauds

Nadal obviously, obvious to anyone who knows and plays tennis

Fed - Kobe
Nadal - Lebron
Joker - KD
Murray - Kawhi