Yes, good job Liverpool....HOWEVER

Yes, good job Liverpool....HOWEVER

Attached: 1550429485756.jpg (1080x1080, 332K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Spauefr4dPY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

About 5 of Madrids are absolute fraud titles they got by inviting the likes of Dundee to their stadium and beating them 3-0. Fair play to Milan though.

Crazy how Barca only had 1 title until 2006. Also Milan are trash now so Liverpool will overtake them.

you made that up retard

Madrid have so many asterisks next to their trophies though.

I don't even know how many of theirs are actually legit, maybe 6 or 7?

>Halal - 13
Those shit amateur invitational "european cups" from the 50s shouldn't count.

Bayern has more finals than Barcelona, bro.

Fix this, bro.

what part of madrid are you from?

>About 5 of Madrids are absolute fraud titles
only 5? lmao
check each and every one of those cups and you'll be surprised how few are legit
and yes, the first 5 ones were an absolute joke, including this penaldo win in a cl final:
youtube.com/watch?v=Spauefr4dPY

>Barcelona higher final:win ratio

what's the problem?

Fuck you, bro.

Fuck you, bro.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fucking shit that video

Is as if Spain was under a dictatorship and had a favorite team, transfered all the best players in the country at that team through either blackmail and threat. Kinda like Romania's 80's Steaua Bucharest.

>Fair play to Milan though.
Milan participated in the invitational European Cup tournament too.

the 13 number is never spoken for good reason. it's basically like a zoomer believing the Star Wars films were released in numerical order.

>defending is a penalty
lmao. fuck halal

>crying over things that happend 60 years ago
why are anti-madrid babies so pathletic? i'm sure no madrid fan know what happend when milan was cl first time, or how benfica do it, yet all crybabies know about penalty in fucking 1960 match
just deal with it and stop crying.

Why are the ones from the Franco era even counted?
Were uefa even fucking involved in those cups,?

based

>gets in front of the attacker to cover the ball
>penalty

even in the most sissified era of football that is objectively NEVER a penalty, simply good defending.

and that was an era where players got yellow cards for throwing punches

>shaqiri only dude pictured twice
based

This is complete rubbish. Spains first Ballon Dor winner and best player played for Barca

Because the Franco argument is made up fanfiction by the sore losers of Barcelona. Franco did much more for Barcelona than for Real, Barcelona won more than Real during the initial and hardest part of Franco's regime and Franco was actually an Atlético Aviación (now Atlético Madrid) supporter, although he didn't really followed football that much.

Attached: Barça-franquista.jpg (540x310, 39K)

What they didn't show was the real player getting elbowed
The game ended 7-3 and when it happened Real was already winning 3-1

This is Spain's squad in 1964 which won the Euro

Attached: real.png (1667x598, 52K)

That penalty didn't even matter.
Stay mad barcafags

The real red pilled truth is that no titles or trophies before about 1970 should count (And even titles in the 70s are nothing compared to the modern ones)

Football was simply too easy in those days. It was a very casual and non-professional sport. Players would turn up drunk or hungover to matches. Most teams were fucking terrible. In England in particular football players were just random working class lads with more grit than skill (This is where England's obsession with "effort and passion" over actual talent comes from)

No one gives a fuck about Madrid's titles in the 50s and 60s, just like Sunderland's league wins of the 30s or Huddersfield's are completely irrelevant and mean nothing.

Imagine being this much of a clueless idiot.
Professional players exist since the late 19th Century. If those titles don't count then England has no WC. Granted that football was different, but 50 years from now it will be different too. We don't get to choose when history of football starts.

>If those titles don't count then England has no WC

Yes, I agree with you. It's well documented how much trickery and shithousery was involved in our WC win.

Learn about football you mouthbreathing spastic.

if this was a penalty (LMAO), imagine all the other refballing that went on in that game, you fokin retards

Does anyone have that graphic someone made proving some of Madrid's wins were unfair?

>the cope

Franco was an Athletico fan tho

>imagine
>guess
>act as if
>make up
>cope

Attached: divarez3.gif (320x163, 1.65M)

I can see where you're coming from but no, i'd argue that anything before say 1930 doesn't count but not 1970 wtf

yall sound like sore losers tbqhwy

real madrid is fucking ridiculous my god

Only the first one was invitational.

If we had to do revisionism, then in 10 years everybody would say no trophies before 2018 should count because they didn't have VAR or team tactics where garbage
Then 10 years later, no trophies before 2028 should count because now they use full AI controlled drones to film every movement of the players, or that the tactics pre 2028 were primitive
In 50 years they could say no trophy before the first genetic engineered superhuman football players started playing count because normal human players were terrible

Their team was extremly good and full of players that have proven themselves in other clubs

that game is considered the best ever in football. lots of people remember it, none of them for the """refball""". you don't know shit.