These are the four best teams in English history

These are the four best teams in English history.

Attached: goats.jpg (412x367, 68K)

is that a bootleg Chelsea badge?

One of these things is not like the others...

No, that's Liverpool. They won a CL yesterday.

No, they've each won the league at least once, right?

>6
>3
>0
>0

Everton are a bigger club than City. I'm a red and I'll defend those toffee bastards on here

It's true. Also, erm, Chelsea and Spurs probably. Villa is another one.

Replace City with Chelsea and we are set

Villa and Chelsea.....where are they?

>It's true.
no
>Also, erm, Chelsea and Spurs probably.
no
>Villa is another one.
Your next line is "Forest are a bigger club than City" (also false)

Chelsea has far more trophies than Man city. I'd go for the Orignal Top4. When EPL teams dominated Europe from 2005-2012

I thought of Forest literally as I posted

>13
>4
>3
>0
huh

>Arsenal
>Wank Cheaty
>0 European cups between them

Try again friend

Attached: 1559057594351.jpg (399x400, 13K)

3 English history, 1 Arab human rights abusers history...

Ok, I've solved it. Delete City and Arse and just call it the two (2) best teams etc etc.
No sane person could disagree with that.

City aren't even top 10 if you're talking about club size and prestige.

Villa, Forest, Leeds, Newcastle, Everton, Spurs, West Ham just to name a few.

they're a second division side who had an unreal peak for 5 years under based Clough.
Why should this supercede the fact they've been a second division side for all their history, with two decades out of the premier league.

One wears blue while the others wear red?

If we're talking history, City were recently in the League 1 which is 3rd tier and by recently I mean whenever that was. City vs Forest is arguable at best. City vs Chelsea/Spurs/Villa/Everton isn't even rational.

Weird Everton badge m8

Based

How many European trophies do the bottom two have combined?

Attached: nope.png (658x657, 72K)

FTFY

Attached: correct.jpg (412x367, 60K)

>Man City breaking into the Top10 was difficult to stomach but this is just getting silly now.

replace shity with Villa

All jokes aside, this. It’s:

>Man U
>Liverpool
>Arsenal
>Chelsea

I'd replace city with Chelsea

>History
>Chelsea

Chelsea was good during an era which actually matters.

Two European trophies before Roman. Go suck a fat one, cock jockey

And what era was that?

replace citeh with chelski

Three European trophies before Roman actually. And a 100,000 seater stadium. It’s objectively United, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal. Villa are above City.

Never happened

Pretty much, they have more league titles than city. Don't start with that " football started in 92" bullshit

>no european trophies
>better than chelsea

weak bait

Chelsea’s the most successful club since the turn of the millennium though, even more so than United.
Man Utd
Liverpool
Arsenal
Chelsea

And in that order.

This post is the only one that is correct so far. With the order already complete that is.

fixed
(blackburn is under united)

Attached: file.png (888x751, 519K)

liverpool have never held the title of Premier League Champions

How?
>United took a UCL and a europa league as well
>muh extra europa league
>8 prem titles in this century alone
>3 total UCL final appearances
>god tier 08 team better than anything chelsea have produced

>This is what dingles actually believe

Jesus kek’d.

Very funny little goon.

>6
>3
>0
>0
huh

>ITT: soibois crying about City's dominance
it appears our superiority has caused you some discomfort

>shitty
>arseanal
Real top is, Liverpool, Man U, forest, villa

The league? They’ve all won the league before. In fact Liverpool won it 18 times, pretty impressive

>wolves
>great
t. portuguese immigrant

Yeah but they held the title twice of the European champions.

Not as impressive as 20

Sure....

Chelsea: 6 x EPL, 1 x CL, 2 x EL, 2 x CWC, 8 x FA Cup
City. 6 x EPL, 1 x CWC, 6 x FA Cup