New crests

Attached: 15 Sunderland.png (256x256, 31K)

Attached: 14 Leicester City.png (256x256, 104K)

Attached: 23 Norwich City.png (256x256, 33K)

Blades, Walsall and Stanley's have been like that for years though.

>the Spanish badge autist is here again

I will leave if you don't want me in your thread

Ignore him

>known as 'The Robins'
>two unicorns

The ship and castle represent the city. "Robins" does not, it's just a nickname based on the kit colour.

Attached: 46 Burton Albion.png (256x256, 61K)

>Backdating the founding of the club

Teams should work on their own identity instead of just taking it from their hometown. To be honest, European heraldry is quite predictable:

>Lions
>Horses/Unicorns
>Ships if a coastal city
>Castles/Knights
>Dragons
>Eagles/most rarely some other bird

In some cases (Liverpool, Barcelona, Bayern München) it works fine. In others, it is better to rely on the team's own history, nicknames. They are more diverse, more vibrant.

Attached: Toulouse.png (256x256, 56K)

No, the more teams can remain rooted in their hometown in this age of hyper international money seeking the better. I want my team to reflect its traditions and the community it came from, not what some marketing twat thinks will sell a few more XXXL shirts to Hank and Cletus.
The nicknames and culture of the club has developed organically, and can continue to do so.

There's two major clubs in Bristol though, should they both have the same badge?

>let's take the image of a statue that has been the symbol of the city for millenia and turn it into a vector mess with a genuinely mentally challenged looking wolf. Also the team is now called Roma 1927 except it isn't. Oh and here, enjoy this orange.
Left is the new one if it isn't clear. The only. Good thing about this is the red.

Attached: AS_Roma_New-Old-copy.jpg (566x360, 142K)

Then what about all the other badges originated from nicknames?

>Manchester "Red Devils"
>Newcastle "Magpies"
>Norwich "Canaries"
>Leicester "Foxes"

And so on. As far as I know, they are not linked to their cities' identities,but teams' history legitimate their symbols.

Attached: sheffield_wednesday_badge_redesign_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bq2oUEflmHZZHjcYuvN_Gr-bVmXC2g6irFbtWDjolSHWg.jpg (480x300, 35K)

horrible, looks like some MLS garbage

there is literally nothing wrong with the current one though

Generic as shit, what a shame.

It’s the same fucking thing you sperg

Imagine being this retarded

We like you

Newcastle don't have a magpie on their crest, the badge is based on the colours same as the nickname.
Leicester and Norwich as cities both had preexisting links to those.
That leaves the Theater of Plastic, which is no surprise.

I bet you think a stone baked Italian calzone pizza and a hot pocket are the same thing too.

dig this desu, a proper old school throwback AND with the club motto in latin

Thank you Porteño

Btw, I just recalled I also saved a concept for Bristol based on the robin.

Attached: 45 Bristol City.png (256x256, 45K)

>all new crests are the exact same shit

So this is what it's like to witness death first-hand

They used to

Attached: club-crest-1976-1983.jpg (300x300, 40K)

>American can't pay for his prescription glasses

Yes, it's one of the cleanest badges in the Premier League. It's just I was rebranding the first two English divisions and I only stylized it. I would have posted any of the others, but I dedicated a thread to them and I don't want to flood Yea Forums

hope we go back to a round one too

Attached: avfc_logo_evolution.jpg (1000x155, 67K)

Is Hull just gonna keep trying every year now?

Lol shit clubs with shit crests

Improvement.

Attached: benfica crest evolution.png (610x209, 117K)

eh, I like it better than the old one, always thought it was a fat man

Attached: MAIN-Juve-badges.jpg (615x409, 28K)

>going from something intricate and unique to something generic, bland, and modern
I hate marketers. Literally everything is becoming plastic.