Based scousers making /pol/ seethe

based scousers making /pol/ seethe

Attached: liv.png (1413x239, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x-4FJcnX0i8&t=
twitter.com/magnitsky/status/1134738319571673088
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

why are bongs such disrespectful scum?

But /pol/ hates Margaret Thatcher because she is "a neoliberal cuckservative jew puppet"

They may even like Jeremy Corbyn more than her, since he personally (not the whole Labour Party) hate the EU, the NATO, and all regular western institutions, and there is a history of anti-semitism and despise for Israel in the Labour Party

>hate evil person
>good

>hate evil Jew
>bad

Why is there a square in Madrid named after Thatcher?

[Seven Nation Army starts playing]

OOOH JEREMY CORBYN

Attached: corb-on-may-be-informed-compare-them-on-the-issues-22750754.png (500x534, 129K)

we have a place here named after Winston Churchill

/pol/ likes Corbyn more than Thatcher though ya brainlet.

>The decision to name the square in Madrid after Thatcher was made by the then-ruling right-wing Popular Party in 2014.

>The square, which contains a Hard Rock Café and five-star hotel, had existed for decades but had not previously been given a name.

>Thatcher was the first British prime minister to make an official visit to Spain when she travelled there in 1988.

the absolute boy

A dildo in Thatcher's dead arse

Attached: 787bd7df05646e4a8fb93c062e64447e5c2b790cb61e2f883b6346778f8fdc1e.png (1152x806, 803K)

I'm a scouser and I support everton. Stop calling the wall pushers "scousers", they are pakis, norwegians and londoners.

t. rhys from rhyl

Limmy is a good proddy lad.

my irish brother

>there is a history of anti-semitism
There really fucking isn't, it's nothing more than a smear campaign. When you actually look into claims against Corbyn they're invariably distorted or taken out of context. People need to learn not to believe what they see in the media, especially the British media

Scousers aren't Bongs

That fact they changed the name suggests it's the Scousers who are seething.

why are liverpool fans supporting and open anti-semite
do liverpool fans hate jews?

Corbyn is still utter shit as a leader though.

youtube.com/watch?v=x-4FJcnX0i8&t=

Thas a woman yer talkin aboot

tough to lead a bunch of neo-libs

It's very hard to lead when you're constantly being undermined and defamed by practically everyone including most of your own party. I think he's doing OK with that taken into account.

>I think he's doing OK with that taken into account.
He really isn't. He couldn't even beat the worst Conservative government in recent years in a general election.

>It's very hard to lead when you're constantly being undermined and defamed by practically everyone including most of your own party.

Seems to be the case for everyone in UK politics, Tory or Labor.

churchill did something though
what did thatcher do?

He got 40% of the vote bruv, up from 31% two years earlier, having been leader for only eighteen months. He did fucking great.

Before May botched the 2017 election and became a lame duck, she had very solid backing from her party and the media. What's happening to Corbyn is something else.

>He got 40% of the vote bruv, up from 31% two years earlier, having been leader for only eighteen months. He did fucking great.
And still ended up winning fewer seats than the Government. To quote Bill Shankly: "If you are first you are first. If you are second you are nothing."

FOKH MAGGEH LA

>He had a brilliantly improved performance but still won fuck all
No wonder Liverpool fans identify with him so much.

Killed 96 Scousers.

>No anti-semitism in the paki-party
Yes, that sounds about right.

>losing an election to the current clown show tories

These are some ridiculously high standards. How exactly do you think Labour could have won? If it weren't for Corbyn they would have done as shit as in 2010 and 2015.

He didn't though. The 2017 Tories were not the same as the 2019 Tories, they were incredibly dominant. They were expected to absolutely crush Labour, and they still ended up with their best voteshare since Thatcher.

Couldn't they find any asians to push into fountains this time?

>2017 tories werent a clown show

lol

I love the cognitive dissonance of the rabid Corbynites who both laud him as the hero of the nation, but also froth at the mouth at the idea of leaving the EU.
As if he didn't have a 40 year record of euro-skepticism, and a 40 year record of never changing his mind on anything.
Seems like some might have finally seen through him on that score, given the Euro election results.

You have a very short memory. I would add that winning in 2017 would have been a disaster in the long run because whichever party won was always going to tear itself apart over Brexit.

Not him, but the 2017 snap election was surprising.

Attached: imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-2HwlqQ4E5Qo0xVK.jpg (1841x1200, 658K)

>These are some ridiculously high standards.
He lost against probably the worst campaign ran by an incumbent Government in history.

is right.

Don’t know much about Brit politics. Since May is resigning, is there going to be another election soon? Or does the winner of the Tory leadership race just take her spot as PM?

Latter.

New Tory leader will be PM.
Not sure how long it'd last though, it's an impossible job as it stands.

Thank you. Is there a front runner?

Tbf most mega Corbyn cultists are freakshow "Lexiteers" who don't seem to care that basically every version of Brexit will affect the poorest the most, who they are supposed to care about.

I like the bloke but voted Lib Dem last week.

Why are northerners so leftist?

You better believe it

Attached: BoJo.jpg (700x394, 36K)

Latter, facing wipeout at an election, the new leader likely simply won't call one until they have to in 2022.

So again, what should he have done differently? He had about six weeks of campaigning to undo all the anti-Labour brainwashing of the previous years, and he almost managed it, starting from about 25% in the polls. If the campaign had been longer he might have won.

100/100 top bantz la

Attached: corbyn-square.jpg (660x495, 39K)

i remember just fine, the election was called in the first place because may was already flailing badly and tried to use the election to bully through her vision of brexit

Based

Because most jobs here were industrial before a lot of it went, entire towns and communities based around textiles, fishing, steelworks etc. suddenly bereft of jobs for life.

So there's a stronger sense of community and pro-union sentiment.

Totally wrong, that's hindsight talking. See . May was massively popular at the time.

>So again, what should he have done differently?
Have some charisma. Nobody takes him seriously apart from retarded cultists.

>may was already flailing badly
Quite the opposite in fact. The polls suggested Labour would be annihilated.

You remember wrong lad, May called the election because it looked like she would lead the Tories to a record victory. Why would she risk an election if she was flailing?

If anything it was the complete opposite, May was so overconfident that she ended up shooting herself in the foot by putting shit like the Dementia Tax and plans to reintroduce fox hunting into the manifesto.

>why is the historical cradle of the industrial revolution and trade union movement leftist

Attached: Huge chimneys emerge from the ground to symbolise the industrial revolution during the opening cerem (615x410, 52K)

She will always live on rent-free in the heads of every bin dipper. They go on about how she snatched their milk, but only because they're normally the ones doing the snatching.

No, she called it because her majority wasn't huge, and all the polls had her miles ahead. The logic, I presume, was to return with a 50+ majority and avoid all the parliamentary bickering that has made any kind of brexit deal impossible. Any actual deal was still a long way off.
Unfortunately for her, she was absolutely useless at campaigning, and it's one of the things Corbyn is actually good for.

Rocket League?

>Why would she risk an election if she was flailing?

>to bully through her vision of brexit

she claled an election based on corbyn being unelectable and was largely proven right, tories did badly but still kept power based on the fact people didnt want corbyn as pm

stop quoting paper muck at me you fools, they write whatever suits their agenda

The madman did it. Absolutely mental.

Poor people are often leftist.

>tories did badly but still kept power based on the fact people didnt want corbyn as pm
lol they lost their majority and had to compromise with the DUP

kek
S

Attached: 2500maymay.jpg (1920x1152, 402K)

yeah thats why i said they did badly

She truly has been a non stop catastrophe from the day she called that election.

Why do so many Norwegians support Liverpool?

Here in America, it’s a strange case. Pundits who think they know all attribute Trump’s win to either cheating, appealing to racist voters, or appealing to neglected working-class voters. With the third choice, some will claim to understand working-class middle Americans and say that the left is out of touch on social issues as well. I don’t know what really is true, because you are always going to find people who disprove your claims.

Does the British working class only support the Labour because of unions, or do they also like more of their leftist policies?

Bad analogy. May sprang a sneaky snap election on Labour in the hope of crushing them, but instead they gained seats (and deprived her of a majority). In that context it was a great result for Labour. It's not like Corbyn patiently waited 5 years for the scheduled election and then blew it, a la Miliband.

>tories did badly
43% of the vote lad. Best since 1987. If either party did badly why did they get 83% between them?

These wur men yi a trade

Because they lack culture of their own, and Liverpool were good back when they first started getting football on the TV.

>bjornebye
>heggem
>kvarme
>leonhardsen
>riise
we love a norgelad

Is OGS hated in Norway because of his association with united?

Limmy is based tho.

Attached: 1532277627291.png (458x485, 312K)

>Bad analogy
That's a quote, not an analogy.

>If either party did badly why did they get 83% between them?
You are fucking clueless if you don't know the answer to that.

>Have some charisma
Well if you can find a Labour MP with charisma AND Corbyn's very popular policies, tell me.

>That's a quote, not an analogy.
Well then your quotation is irrelevant. Politics is not like football, the party that comes second is not 'nothing'.

>You are fucking clueless if you don't know the answer to that.
If you're talking about Brexit you're wrong. Polling done afterwards showed that very few people voted based on that. The election was polarised because for the first time in decades the two big parties were actually offering different things.

>isis aren't real muslims!

That kind of makes sense because he was your ally in WWII

twitter.com/magnitsky/status/1134738319571673088

This aged well you muppet

Hopefully Boris wins the leadership

Liverpool has a very strong local identity, lots of them say they don't see themselves as English

>Anti-zionism = anti-semitism
Thanks for proving my point. What a load of bullshit.

killed scousers
a true heroine

If you cant see that Zionist is just a euphemism for Jew there is no hope

>Muh tropes
Try harder. Zionism is a real problem in the world and it exists separately from the Jews. People have a right to denounce zionism and not be labelled racists.

if you support corbyn you're racist against jewish people
end of

OY VEY

>labelled racists
literally who cares at this point, labels like 'racist' 'sexist' and '-phobias' are just baseless smears now due to rampant intentional misuse, not even worth acknowledging

collateral damage

Curious if you feel the same way about Islam.

Zionism is essentially Jewish nationalism. Don't know if there exists an equivalent for Muslims. If there does it certainly isn't as pernicious as Zionism is, given how much power Israel has.

>exists separately from the Jews
I agree with your comment except that part

Is it a toilet?

What's your point, greaseball?

>fucking KIKES ruining our society through leftism and BBC porn even filling our beloved tellie with historic series about black Britons
>woah woah don't vote Labour, they're antisemitic! That is wrong!

>/pol/
>Liking a woman
>Liking Thatcher out of all women

Attached: 1446811525379.jpg (497x943, 89K)

>Don't know if there exists an equivalent for Muslims
Wasn't there some sort of Islamic State that popped up a few years ago?

Commies and scousers aren't people.

Attached: kill everyone.jpg (396x360, 26K)

It's not racism to be opposed to zionism, although it is labelled as anti-semitism by the zionists themselves. I don't think it's terribly difficult to understand: some racists are also anti-zionists, but it's not actually necessary to be racist in order to be anti-zionist, but zionists say that if you're against them you must be racist. Sure, you can say who cares about labels but they are important to establish easily what sets of belief people hold. I think it's important also, in this particular case, that the people are aware that they are not necessarily racists if they arrive at the conclusion to oppose zionism.

These days not many people need to care and it will still ruin someones life. Form a quick twitter mob of permanently outraged crazies and that's all you need.
All ably abetted by our shitstain media of course, who'd rather just report twitter shit than do any real work

I have been told it was completely unrelated to Islam

Ah yeah my bad, think the Jews had something to do with it.

ISIS was not nationalistic. It was not a 'homeland' for Muslims, it was just the only territory they happened to have conquered.

So funny how petrified the leftists in this thread become at accusations of anti-Semitism as if that mattered in the slightest bit in a Christian country

Zionist State is ostensibly secular and nationalist. The (so-called) Islamic State was ostensibly a theocracy.
It was denounced by the consensus of opinion amongst Islamic scholars.

I still believe it's not a coincidence everything bordering or not alligning with Israel such as Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt (Sinai) and soon Iran have to suffer from either foreign funded terorrist organizations or Americans looking for WMD's

True, no need to nations when your goal is to create a worldwide muslim caliphate.

There are a lot of reasons to be critical of Israel, but then again there are a lot of reasons to be critical of Palestine, the super anti-Zionist left wing people seem to just criticize Israel for being heavy handed and oppressive when they let Venezuela, Syria, Iran, Hamas and other regimes off the hook.
Its easy to conflate them as anti-semetic when all they do is attack the only Israeli state and turn a complete blind eye to worse, non Jewish regimes.

It's because anti-semitism implies racism. People that aren't racist don't prefer to be labelled as racist.

Sold British assets to foreigners on the cheap

Maybe there is some point in holding 'the only democracy in the Middle-East' to a higher standard. Israel likes to claim they belong in the western world and aren't some 2nd world rogue nation

Why does it matter to you if you oppose the interests of other foreign ethnicities indirectly within your own country?

The point is that it's a lot easier to separate Judaism from Zionism than it is to separate moderate Islam from radical Islam.

It certainly is no coincidence. To presume that the zionists are just sitting around playing dice and not meddling in the affairs of their neighbours in order to keep them weak or whatever, would be extremely naive.

lol

If they're wrong in their criticism, call them out. You don't need to create this argument that they should also be critical of x y z, it does nothing to prove them wrong only it's a deflection. If you want to make a case to criticize also those other regimes, do so and garner support. Honestly though, there's no nation in the world that could escape criticism, so should we not target our criticism against the regimes which cause the most trouble first.

I'm not sure that it does or does not.

Then it seems utterly pointless to worry yourself over what members of a tiny irrelevant exclusive religion thinks of you

Those other countries you mention aren't apartheid states founded on recently conquered territory. The Zionists occupied Palestine in living memory and have spent the last 70 years treating the natives like shit.

That scousers are bongs.

>so should we not target our criticism against the regimes which cause the most trouble first.
We should, but when you are ignoring the top 10 worst regimes and just focusing on Israel, you have the ask the question of why? If you are from Palestine or have roots there it makes sense, but if you are Dave from Wiltshere it seems a bit odd

So do you propose imperialism to rectify the issue?

They aren't. They're basically Irish inbreds and assorted pakis.

Palestine is based because homosexuality is illegal.

>not enjoying the occasional dicking

you're missing out lad

So what do you consider to be the "worst" regime right now if not Israel? North Korea? Saudi Arabia?

Um... sweetie, those aren’t real muslims

What enjoyment from Limmy could rightwingers possibly get? Do you think he's like MDE or some shit?

They aren’t paco

What makes you think I’m a right winger? Paranoid cunt

>scottish political "humor"
That's my idea of hell right there.

Crossposting from Yea Forums and from Liverpool what the fuck is going on here
>Everyone on my road is singing Liverpool songs
Glad I'm not in town tonight fucking Hell

People on here tend to be right wing I don't know if you're noticed that

Attached: 1530201143280.jpg (555x394, 31K)

heh