I like how you have to resort to %'s because you know that using the number of punches landed more per round exposes how weak your argument is.
>Fury landed 50% more punches in the first round
He landed 2 more punches than Wilder in the first round, both of those being those pitter patter jabs I was talking about.
> 67% more in the second
He landed 2 more punches in the 2nd.
Once again, both of those 2 more punches were the difference of 2 jabs.
>175% more in the third
This would be a round I agree that Fury won, 5 more punches than Wilder in this round.
>70% more in the 4th
2 more punches landed in the fourth.
I like how you exposed how weak your argument is for me.
Oh wow, Fury landed an average of 2 more punches per round in the first four rounds, which doesn't at all speak to how light his punches often are, particularly his jabs which are often meant to just touch.
When you break it down like that, you start to realize why Fury didn't win the fight. Hey, why not continue this for the other rounds too!
>Fury outlanded Wilder in the 5th round by 1 punch, the difference being 1 jab.
>Fury outlanded Wilder in the 6th round by 2 punches, a jab and a power punch.
>Wilder outlanded Fury in the 7th round by 2 punches, a difference of 2 jabs.
>Fury outlanded Wilder in the 8th round by 1 punch, a difference of 1 power punch
>Wilder outlanded Fury in the 9th round by 6 punches and a knockdown
>Fury outlanded Wilder in the 10th round by 9 punches, his only truly decisive round
>Fury outlanded Wilder in the 11th round by 1 punch, the difference of a jab
>Wilder outlanded Fury in the 12th round by 6 punches and a knockdown
Wow, throughout 12 rounds Fury only managed to outland Wilder by more than 2 punches in a single round!
Absolutely dominant boxer! 100% should have won the fight!!!
Pathetic, so long as Fury escaped the fight with his life you were always going to give him the fight.