sp BTFO GAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Sp BTFO GAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
besoccer.com
twitter.com
what a weird stat
lmao what is this absolute cope
its simple facts and sp just cant handle that
Liverpool would have also won the title if they got more points.
fuck offff ABLiv
This is genuinely so bafflingly retarded I'm actually getting pissed off looking at it
And we would have gotten away with it , if it wasnt for you meddling ABL`s
What does Livermore have to do with this?
>someone American gimp got paid to figure this out
How do I get a comfy meaningless job like that?
got a bone to pick with Livorno, lad?
"we should get a second place trophy just because we Liverpool"
youtube.com
AHAHAHAHAHA CONTINUE TO COPE
What if wins were four points instead of three points?
Or you get a half point if you're leading at the half.
Maybe a bonus point for beating a team ahead of you in the standings?
Once you start coming up with wacky ways to score the game, there's no stopping your creativity.
>have the media, referees & the F.A on you side
>still lose
Liverpool's a joke of a club.
obviously, Pep teams hardly ever score long range goals
>Maybe a bonus point for beating a team ahead of you in the standings?
I unironically think that one may be interesting to see, as unfair as it would be.
he was furious at kompany when he took the shot lol
That's the hardest cope I've ever seen, Van Dijk (fraud).
Based
>we
>ESPN
What if goals scored by teams in blue were worth triple?
>have the media, referees & the F.A on you side
>still lose
But citteh won
>media are pro city and not liverpool
tip top zozzle
Keep points as they are for W/D/L but apply a multiplier after each match:
+0.05 for every person of colour
+0.1 for every homosexual
a team of two gay whiteys and 9 n'gubus would actually get 4.95 points
What if goals by teams beginning with the letter L were QUADRUPLE??
who the hell came up with this bullshit
>espn fc
>Premier League joint winner
Absolutely disgusting
>leicester stomp the league scoring 7 at a time
based
>Doesn't deny City buys refs
>Thinks media isn't Chelsea/City/United
You can tell that the media is biased against Liverpool witth the reaction to the semi finals
>Liverpool comes back from 3-0 agg and beats Barca
Wow that was a good comeback
>Spurs comeback from 2-0 against Ajax
THIS IS THE GREATEST COMEBACK OF ALL TIME
Cope harder
if you got 1.5 points for a draw, which is fairest, then liverpool would be on 100.5 and city would be on 99
>muslim DSL is now false flagging as a Liverpool supporter because no one cares that city won
what do you get out of this?
The Spurs upset was hyped mainly because two English teams did it back to back. In isolation the Spurs result wouldn't have been a big deal cause Ajax are Dutch shitters and Spurs should have beaten them comfortably
Reminded me of Slippy G, he used to run around the midfield like a headless chicken but then he'd occasionally score a glorious blooter.
Except it was 3-0
>It's because two English teams did it
Yet Spurs gets all the media praise despite only beating shitters
I need a source on this
How about:
5 points away win
4 points home win
2 points away draw
1 point home draw
0 points any loss
besoccer.com
Except it was 2-3
Losing 1-0 at home in the first leg means basically nothing to a good team
3-0 away on the other hand...
okay do that, but also make 0-0 draws award 0 points :)
how about CL semi-final against Barcelona? First would have been 4:0, I doubt they'd come back from that
first leg*
the guys that call in talksport take the absolute piss
>3x4 is 7
state of British education