Wait so let me understand this correctly

Alex Ferguson in his decades long career never got as high as 97 points ? despite being one of the few big spenders, Mostly facing ineffective British coaches and very often bribing refs. Interesting. The man is a legend but thank God he wasn'tt facing fully backed great coaches like Klopp and Poch.

Attached: images (9).jpg (715x429, 33K)

Attached: 1557334604635.png (1440x1080, 2.65M)

Wait so let me understand this correctly:
Despite having 1.3 billion people India never produced a single worldclass athlete in any relevant sport?

>retarded opinion
>flag

>1.4 BILLION people
>Average time spent in education 5 and a half years
>1 silver medal in women's badminton and 1 bronze in women's wrestling at Rio 2016

This is why no one takes Indians seriously.

At least we have the excuse of being poor. What excuse does Ferguson have? Not have enough bribes for all the refs?

I mean I still recognize he is a legend but let's be honest he was just a mediocre fish in a small dirty puddle.

>At least we have the excuse of being poor.
ah yes brazil the american wakanda

Still a lot richer than us. They have been for the past century or so.

Their biggest issue is gang violence and corruption. Other than that they have an ideal population size, trillions of dollars worth of natural resources more so than most nations on earth. They're destined for success as a nation. You would have to incredibly incompetent to fuck that up.

Thanks :)

Ferguson was a better football player than India has ever produced, forget managers

So Ferguson can only be compared to a country with no notable footballing achievements?

I mean you seem to have less respect for him than I do. That's a very small team mentality bro. I think he is a product of his time and wouldn't cut it these days but he was certainly EPL tier at least :)

>At least we have the excuse of being poor
>African countries that are even more impoverished than India have produced dozens of world class footballers
Don't you have a latrine to be cleaning, my genetically inferior friend?

Africans are more athletic. They dominate sports over whites as well as dominating white women in bed.

Nothing to be ashamed of when they're literally cuckolding whites in their own countries.

poverty is not an excuse. most top athletes come from poverty. in fact it's the reason rich countries are declining at sport. spoiled kids who don't know how to work hard.

>India provides insightful opinions of SAF's mediocrity
>Yea Forums can only reply with ad hominens

OH NONONONONO

>You would have to incredibly incompetent to fuck that up

And that's our specialty bby ;)

Yeah but at least he got his trophies.

Nonsense user. Maybe it's because you only hear the success stories but mass poverty doesn't just affect the individuals, it creates a distinct lack of quality institutions as well.

A minor success in the early days of the nation can spur enough interest to create those institutions but in India that has been focused on sports like cricket, badminton, Field hockey, etc...

He'd rather give some youth players game time than statpad points

Poor? Your country has a fucking space program. And still takes financial aid off mine.

It make sense honestly. Back then, teams were closer to the average budget of the league. This means that teams were closer in terms of quality of players and training. Nowadays, you have a select few who receive millions from outside sources, while the others are left to dust. This is why Leicester's win was such a big deal too.