Let’s be honest, they are by far the most dominant team in modern history

Let’s be honest, they are by far the most dominant team in modern history.

Much better than Peps Barca or MSN Barca, and Mous Real or Mous Chelsea when you factor in relative competition level

Setting the league points record alone is incredible, but doing it an era when Chelsea, United, Tottenham, and Arsenal are all also powerhouses is almost inconceivable

Not to mention mid table teams like West Ham and Everton are spending more than top 4 teams in Italy or Spain.

> inb4 no champions league

It’s called variance retards. One bad game in the CL doesn’t negate 76 games of complete dominance in the best league in the world

Attached: 40AF84A0-BED7-4761-AA12-82C0897990CD.jpg (768x432, 113K)

Pep is a fucking coward and experiment way too much when he can just smash and grab the match

Has a billion dollar squad. Barely wins the league and losses to memes in the CL. Poch Klopp and Simeone better

why bother typing all that bs if people will just look at your flag and ignore it
also
>losing to spuds
lmao

Jesus christ, shut the fuck up mutt. You dont know shit about REAL football

>Poch Klopp and Simeone better
None of them are better. Only mou is truly better.

how many CLs have they won

>Better than Peps Barca
Retard

Pep has annihilated Mou multiple times

What was Dominant about getting smoked by content in year one. Get off his dick

City had an easy as fuck CL draw this year too

>Waxtap
>Lyon(they actually didn't beat Lyon and lost to them once)
>Hoffenheim
>Schalke
>Spuds

why do you think he was handed the keys to a billion dollar team?

*Conte

It works both ways desu.

Jupp is better then both

I disagree, peps these days is terrified by poch, klopp, and Barca, back at his Barca there was no big side that seemed to have the beating of him, even when he left it was because of the constant pressure and mind games from jose while maintaining near perfection. You say the champions league is a small sample but he still was more successful in the small sample with Barcelona. City are probably the best side I've seen at beating smaller sides, and that's what wins you the league, but nearly every time, poch klopp or Barca at Bayern and city is peps weakness

The real kino here is the fact that he and citeh managed to make the slip happen again. That's the only thing you fags should care about.

>it an era when Chelsea, United [...] and Arsenal are all also powerhouses

Of course this was said by an Amerimutt.

All those teams have been in a european final In the last 3 years you stupid fucking nigger

Attached: D6Y8hcxUUAA4_r4.jpg large.jpg (960x518, 48K)

Got to win Champo next year.

Seething scousers itt

>Let’s be honest, they are by far the most dominant team in modern history.
And still has fewer European trophies than a Romanian team, nice dominant team you got.

>much better than Peps Barca
opinion immediately discarded

Pep ALWAYS had the stronger team.

you all
have sex
please

>United
>Powerhouse
They are nothing on 20 years ago and neither are City.

>knockout trophies
lmao

they are going to dominate the European Superleague and the Champions League will become tinpot tier

yawn
they've already won the premiership with their 1000 billion dollar investment
any season doesn't end in a champion's league win for them is a failure
same with PSG

>has infinite money
>scousers and spuds in the meme league finals
Can't make this up

>much better than Pep's Barca

Fucking clueless Yanks

A coward wouldn't be experimenting you retarded pedophile

the PL is more prestigious than the CL

lol I'm so glad Yankees got into football wouldn't wanna miss threads like this one

Bit of a daft argument you have there fella.

I don't think that is true at all. The PL may be more difficult to win, but it certainly isn't more prestigious.

Just won a treble, reached CL quarters, and finished second to city last year idiot

I know more about you’re league than you do. 99% of teams would kill for that.

have sex

At their level, the expectations become different, man city HAS to win the cl they could hire anyone to win them the league more or less.

It's not more prestigious but you can't compare the two because on is a league and the other a knock out tournament.

Attached: Archivo_Shinzō_Abe_Official.jpg (1176x1600, 847K)

I think prime Bayern, prime Barca and prime Chelsea edges them. They all had that winning mentality and drive which I think City lacks. City could very well overtake them all in a year or two though.

City won 12 straight to win the league how is that not winning mentality

They do have it but they underperform in Europe. All the teams I mentioned also did badly at Europe sometimes but they won it eventually. As long as City lacks that CL I dont think they can be called the "most dominant".

>inconceivable
>in a time of shit premier league teams and unlimited arab money hacks

Excuse me. But MSN Barca is 10 times stronger than Shitty.
Also,
08-09 Barca , yeah, that one team where the THREE FINALISTS FOR GOLDEN BALL were from the same team IS the best team ever, and the most dominant one.

Attached: 15245858449601.jpg (990x557, 158K)

>Setting the league points record alone is incredible, but doing it an era when Chelsea, United, Tottenham, and Arsenal are all also powerhouses is almost inconceivable
chelsea, arsenal and united are absolute dogshit
tottenham has a decent starting XI and that's it

>Chelsea, United, Tottenham, and Arsenal
Which era is that exactly? 2004?

>most dominant team of all time
>win the league by 1 point
???

>no champions league

The best United and Chelsea squads would physically dominate and comfortably beat this team of twinks. The golden era of the premier league was 03-10, that period had the highest level of competitiveness

Spent all Christmas in a drunken stupor and still won the league with 98 pts

I miss this era of football bros