Literal who vs literal who will face each other in the champion's league final

>literal who vs literal who will face each other in the champion's league final

this is the worst timeline possible in the history of all histories

Attached: apu.jpg (560x612, 42K)

Liverpool won it before, ya headless simp

>soccer
who cares

yuro soccer is dead. gonna swallow the /ligamx/ pill soon.

I'm as ABLiv as the next rational person, but they aren't a literal who.

> 5 times winner against 4 times winner
> Literal who

Pick one brainlet

Plastic barca faggot detected

>waaaah why isn't the team winning that won it the most often before

Why do you hate Livorno m8?

Liverpool is the 2nd biggest winner in the competitive era (1970-now) and none of their titles were refball so they're actually bigger than Real Madrid with 7 titles

UNDESERVED

Attached: liverlonastats.jpg (622x180, 14K)

Iv been following football for over 25 years and iv never seen this, liverpool? Was it, win a title. They are are literal who team.

based boomer. nottingham is a bigger club than looserpool.

Piss off, Poop

I'm not happy with this time line either. I want Ajax to win so hard for boomer feels but Liverpool are gonna walk it. They're probably going to win the title too....

>waaaah why can't we have barcelona or real madrid in the finals every year

At least it's not Porto x Monaco

Sorry, I meant ABLive

>"Competitive era (1970-now)"
Cheeky and wrong.

Why do you hate Liverpool F.C. (Montevideo) m8?

But Tottenham has never won champions

Apologies for the confusion again, I meant ABLiverpool FC (England)

That's plausible.

nobody likes them la

>two literal whos
That's as zoomer of an opinion as it gets, you fucking whimpbag, weak-ass DNA, You should definitely kill yourself.

Reminder that Mexicans are more obese than even Amerifats