Barca splashed 255M on Coutinho+Dumbelel

1 tap in + 1 own goal

>1 own goal
Imagine actually thinking you can deny reality this blatantly. Even if we accept your version of events, that still wouldn't make it an own goal

>Messi's shot is clearly deflected
>We have to listen to reality
>Linesman clearly say Ronaldo's goals are onside
>Well no my feelings say they're offside so they're offside

>all deflected goals are own goals
Retard

For me it's pulisic

Attached: 1556094963015.webm (480x600, 1.09M)

This one was

Actually depending on whether or not Bilbao insisted on them actually activating the release clause, which they usually do it would be even more than the reported fee

>the only one worth the fee after 2010 was van dijk
The absolute state of the current generation of players

>neymar - €220
>mbappe - €180
>coutinho - €135
>pogba - €105
>dembele - €120
>van dyke - €84
>laporte - €80
Literally the best thing for football right now is to kill every single businessman involved. These are clearly money laundering frauds.

Attached: BBC25664-813E-4C89-973D-E9EC1ACF3124.gif (498x205, 872K)

Ah yes 100 Million for geriatric Ronaldo who can't outscore a 36 year old.

Attached: Untitled.webm (1280x720, 2.42M)

If you support any of the teams in that picture, you're plastic.

>supporting Lazio back in the early 2000's was "being plastic".

> Using an unrealistic and patently absurd line-up so that you can pretend to field an XI
How would that midfield work IRL?

>90m for ronaldo
>got 4 champions league, 400 goals and his entire prime
>sell him for even more than what they paid
Chad team

it's amazing how every single big transfer before 2010 except mendieta was worth and how ever single one after 2010 wasn't

corruption

Crespo and Kaka weren't.
m'Bappé, Van Dijk and Laporte were.

Attached: 1547076999015.jpg (267x168, 7K)

>Feel scammed from buying nerman
>PSG pays even more
waiting for them to buy Coutinho

>Crespo
wrong
>Kaka
true 2bh but at least spending the money they spent for him was absolutely justifiable
>m'Bappé
the liquidator of ligue 1
>Van Dijk
the crucifier of callum wilson
the denier of danny ings
the annihilator of ayoze perez
>Laporte
not worth the money they payed for him at all
plus his mistakes pretty much knocked them out from the cl

> Crespo
Lazio have won literally nothing since buying him and sold him at a loss after just two years. How is that not a massive flop?
> Kaka justifiable
Maybe if your medical staff is on drugs
> m'Bappe
He's a local lad, the hottest talent in the world and competing for the golden boot in his second season. There really is no upper limit in price for a player like that.
> van Dijk
Compare Liverpool's defense before he joined to after.
> Laporte
See above.

>competing for the golden boot in his second season
Only because the sheik paid to give ligue1 goals a *2 multiplier they don't deserve
Otherwise he wouldnt be top ten

But they got 200m for nerman so it's not as bad as it seems

220

Ligue 2 has a *2 multiplier because it's a top five UEFA coefficient league, those have been the rules for like 20 years.
Fucking zoomers, I swear.

A multiplier they don't deserve, they are not a top 5 league

Deserve has nothing to do with it, the criteria for coefficients are objective and there for everyone to see.
Besides, terrible as Ligue 1 may be, it's still better than the Portuguese or Russian leagues.

>Messi got pocketed by van Dijk
le see Messi and run away instead of challenging him man

Been watching ligue1 since nerman joined and many times it feels they picked random fans from the stands to fill in the teams playing
Maybe they need intermediate multipliers for these cases, they are nowhere close to the english, spanish and italian leagues

Not disagreeing