Why does reddit refuse to see it?

Why does reddit refuse to see it?

Attached: 1556746694770.webm (1280x720, 1.02M)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/alcorcon4madri0/status/1123931955970674694
youtube.com/watch?v=L7w6XyS9gmg
youtube.com/watch?v=CSbQLj_sDus
youtube.com/watch?v=m6a2Qtu3728
twitter.com/GeorgieStuart23/status/1123691876702404619
i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556743528845.webm
i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556743755650.webm
i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556744596566.webm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because it doesn't matter.

Can’t watch webums on a phone m8

Who fucking cares? The ball went in the net. Only faggots give a shit if its deflected.

It's a great free kick.

stay mad

To see what? That he's the eternal GOAT and the best footballer ever?

download webm player mate than copy the link into it

(inb4 mobile user hurr durr)

Firefox for android plays webms

>its a great free kick
>ball touched a player on the way
>thus the ball could have easily went in another direction from hitting the player

>its a great free kick

t. iphone subhumans

Balotelli says messi is greater than ronaldo because of this goal. Cant let subhumans have opinions like this when theyre wrong. History will see who was right in the end

Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself with that history shit

HUGE deflection. Thank god we have technology now and this fraud can be exposed.

>empty net goal
>deflected free kick
Nice GOAT you have there, reddit

top vid angle is frauding it because you can hardly see the wall, im sure the further away the deflection is very small, but in the webm you see the change in the spin of the ball and its slow mo.

C O P E

I guarantee virtually everybody 10, 20, 50, 100 years from now will agree Messi was the GOAT.

He's going for the reddit angle today
Yesterday it was the mentally ill angle
>O TWAIN

Attached: 1556759542700.png (644x800, 37K)

youre getting rused i think son

WE DID IT REDDIT

>scores bicycle kick with 50k upvotes
>scores fraud freekick when already 2-0 up

messi will have no legacy, scoring against Huesca and Girona every day does not make a GOAT

ironic shitposting is still shitposting

>messi will have no legacy
Are you stupid or just a Romanian fag?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH BUT ONE OF THE ATOMS ON THE BALL GAVE AN ELECTRON TO ONE OF THE ATOMS ON GOMEZ'S SHIRT! OWN GOAL! OWN GOAL! MESSOY BTFO!

Attached: gypsoy.png (814x806, 76K)

Im using chrome (botnet) on android , i can play webm

ball clearly changes spin and height when it passes the shoulder of gomez. stop downplaying it manlet

>ball clearly changes spin and height when it passes the shoulder of gomez
no it did not

Get a better phone

Romania, this is just pathetic, just stop buddy.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH BUT IT BRUSHED HIS SHIRT NOOOOOO GOOOOOOAL

Attached: aaaaa.png (814x806, 142K)

whats up with penaldo fellaters calling messichads manlets? Is it some sort of projection?

this post deserves more upvotes

>Not using clover
Plebeian

if it didnt brush the shirt Alisson would have saved it

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH BUT THE SHIRT TOOOOOOUCHED IIIIIIIIT

Attached: aaaaa.png (814x806, 118K)

Penaldo fans have seen all his Instagram photos but none of his matches.

if my mom had wheels she would be a car

we'll never know

The gypo pretends to be tall and white for some reason

If my mom had a dick she would be a dad.

>sy humour

is this what Ray Hudson does to your brain? Makes you think your stupid little sayings are clever.

"LiKe ThE BeE StIng oF A LiGhNinG BuLt, AbSolutLEy MageSTErIaL"

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA STOP SAYING RAY HUDSON ONE LINEEEEEEEERS

Attached: aaaaa.png (1600x1000, 882K)

this

>gets bullied so hard he jumps onto his portugal proxy

Attached: 1531790188204.png (600x580, 360K)

mate dont you have a mosque to shoot up or something?

Why are messoy dick riders so insecure that their aguments are >muh proxies

No, the world doesnt revolve around messoy. No he's not the GOAT. No, he didnt play well yesterday. Yes, he got super lucky

Talk to me when messoy stop being a system baby

didn't Canada have a mosque attack 2 years ago?

what do people like you get out of this obsession with other posters and their gimmicks?

is it relief from something in your day to day life? it obviously makes you feel better but why?

We can safely say the goalie put his hand in the spot the ball would have crossed the goal line had it's height not been raised by the shoulder deflection. Clear own goal.

Attached: D5gpLunX4Acuhuw.jpg (2048x1365, 678K)

>the amount of people with their phones out
this is very depressing

Post within 30 seconds of each other if you're not Twain on a proxy

Attached: 1515291099283.jpg (563x542, 32K)

this. Everyone hating on alisson but he new the trajectory had it not been for the deflection

at lease there is one based aussie here

did you start watching football literally yesterday?

>What is clover

Attached: article-2013577-0CF828F500000578-928_634x898.jpg (634x898, 65K)

>that unit next to the greying asian behind the crossbar

Yeah pretty much.

BUUUUUUT IT DEFLEEEEECTED OFF HIS SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRT

Obviously to anyone except messoy dick riders.

That goal would have never happen without that deflection.

Own goal and an empty net tap in. There's your GOAT

BUUUUUUUUUUUUUT THE MICROSCOPIC DEFLECTIOOOOOOOOOOOOOON!!!

wow the e-drama on this board has been taken to new levels

reddit must be leaking again

>implying it wasn't calculated

Have you ever played football? If you did you'd know that any reflection, no matter how small, heavily changes the trajectory of the ball

At least they're not blocking anyone's view. It's way worse in music concerts

>have an open goal
>kick it wide on purpose so autists on a vietnamese stamp collecting imageboard don't call me out as a tap-in merchant
I don't understand why not more players do this

you have issues, mate. why do you have enough time in your day to make something like this?

get a job, you useless cunt.

Attached: yikes.jpg (1728x1296, 508K)

It's like a fast ball bouncing off the seam, or the ball hitting a crack in the pitch. The batsmen positions his bat stroke on the calculated trajectory of the ball as it leaves the bowlers hand, but he can not account for deflections off the raised seam or a deviation from an irregularity in the pitch surface it bounces from, as they happen without sufficient reaction time. The goalie makes the correct assesment of the balls trajectory off the boot, but can not account for, or react to, the deflection off the shoulder that raises the height and slows the shot slightly. And so it crosses into the net, the batsman misses the ball and edges it caught behind.

Attached: Hawkeye-in-Cricket.jpg (416x233, 15K)

holy fuck nice get

but horrendous post get a life

No deflection! Ball spin never change

>this whole thread
Did we break him? He seems more unhinged than usual.

Checked and lmao

Never underestimate the stupidity of a leaf

no it's absolutely not like anything you said because wall deflection is something to take in consideration when defending against set-pieces and not a fault in the design. Besides, the deflection is about 2 degrees of elevation at most and it would have been a goal regardless

>stupidity of a leaf
>german roach

youtube.com/watch?v=L7w6XyS9gmg

youtube.com/watch?v=CSbQLj_sDus

>nobody got this post
you really are redditors

Messi uses the shoulder to gain extra spin on the ball, akin to using the gravitational well of a planet to slingshot a satellite. Messi the true GOAT literally doing rocket science on the pitch.

Attached: slingshot.jpg (960x720, 59K)

It's the desperate damage control form the demented wogs. It's not about the fact they claimed Messi would go missing and Liverpool would win, it's now about trying to belittle Messi and Barca after they proven these shitskins wrong. Again.

>300 IQ analysis

Confirmation bias. You need to trust an outsider who can assess this with clean hands free of preconceptions and prejudices.

honestly cannot believe people are unironically defending a free kick that hit a player in the wall before going in as one of the best free kicks they have seen

shows the casual nature of the freshies on this board i suppose

Attached: 1556569126379.jpg (962x683, 71K)

Its embarrassing that someone is using cricket as an example because if you knew cricket then youd know an image like this is no way sufficient to tell a deflection and from various angles the trajectory or spin may seem different and your eyes can play tricks.

Cricket is a great example where batsmen are given out or not out by alleged edges(deflections)/or near misses that look convincing but are then overturned because its so hard to tell. Only things like examining audio and heat signatures can distinguish true deflections and they use that in cricket's "VAR" system.

Im not convinced at all that this free kick was a deflection and this image will not give you enough evidence.
For me, no deflection.

>implying redditors only use the reddit app and arent basement dwelling pc fags

>off of
fuck off yank, 'bank a shot off another player', off of is a reundant yank expression.

Twain uses a Canadian proxy.

good amount of bollocks, good spacing, nailed the landing
8/10

ITODDLERS BTFO

O TWAIN

Attached: romanian shitposting.webm (800x450, 2.7M)

*bullies other posters on Yea Forums to feel better about myself because if i did this sort of thing on reddit i would be banned*

I'm talking about deviations from a irregular bounces off the pitch (caused by a crack or the ball landing on the raised seam) that lead to legitimate wickets because the ball ends up in a different place than it should have coming out of the hand.

wow you are fucking dumb. stop watching cricket and stop thinking you know anything about football and most importantly stop posting here.

can someone explain the twain meme? is it a romanian ronaldo fan? How did you find out his name

desu I never thought it touched his shoulder until people started shilling that it did. I literally think it's one of those things you can control with your brain.

Attached: 8a4.jpg (316x202, 30K)

Twain is the name of the manager of the Yea Forums PES team from days past. He was Romanian.

Even without that goal messi would still be the eternal goat and god of football so go suck a cock you faggot

It's okay to score deflected goals. An own goal counts just as much as a real one. It's a team sport, individuals don't matter it's about getting results for the team.

>will never acknowledged
>will acknowledged

lmoa you're not Canadian

why do you have to think about something you can see? are you retarded?

green needle

comparing a deflected goal to a wicket from a crack in the pitch is beyond retarded. go away, chink.

LOL WHO CARES AHAHAHAHAH

It's kind of an optical illusion. The way your brain interprets perceived information.

youtube.com/watch?v=m6a2Qtu3728

yeah if you look at it one way its like the ball is sucked out of the net into messis boot
you are retarded

You're explaining this to proxytwain you tard

Im just saying its ironic that you use cricket to elucidate that point rather than the point about hoe completely ambiguous the whole deflection is in the first place.
For me its an illusion caused by that defender moving his shoulder to attempt to deflect it. But i saw in another video slowed down see his shoulder moves after the ball has already past him.

I feel like if people looked at some optical illusions they would see how easily their mind can be tricked and see my point.

So when I didn't have any preconceived bias about the ball touching his shoulder, it never seemed like it hit his shoulder. But then once someone said "watch it again, it hit his shoulder!1!!" it seemed like it did. The was an obvious difference in what I perceived and the only variable that was changed was someone suggesting another outcome.
Stop being a brainlet.

Obsessed.

I know. It also helps other people out when they read the post. I am reminding him how pathetic he is.

It's exactly the same, a deviation and deflection both change the trajectory of the ball from the original one in a period of time that is too fast for the batsman/goalie to react to. Both are legitimate forms of gamesmanship that produce legitimate goals/wickets. An own goal counts just as much for the team as a real goal.

wait you actually think the video is being reversed whenever it changes direction? HAHAHA holy shit you're actually retarded

a cricket pitch is static, cracks or no cracks. players move all over the place in a football game. your analogy is primary school level.

You can clearly see the same deflection from behind the net:
twitter.com/GeorgieStuart23/status/1123691876702404619

I saw it first time. Gaming the wall is part of the art of scoring from free kicks. Own goals count for the team.

Bowlers and batsmen move too. Each delivery moves to a different spot. The field moves each over and can change each ball. The wicket and goal stay in place.

you are talking about cracks in the pitch though, not the bowlers and batsmen.

>this is not a significant deflection and more than enough to take it away from Alisson's hand

State of Yea Forums

Attached: 1556744877265.webm (1280x720, 1.71M)

Are you an idiot? This video is the worst out of all ive seen? Not convincing at all. Poor form on your part lad. Im convinced you only think its a deflectionbecause the guys shoulder moving.

O TWAIN
You need to make your bait better, that's not how an own goal happens, look it up.

the plot thickens

You’re blind

>b-But look at this angle from a mile away where you can see messi actually bent the ball like that

the state of russian posters

I'm not arguing that using opposition players bodies to cause deflections is illegitimate. Messi had no other option but to kick close to the wall and if it deflected and made life difficult for the keeper because of that then all the better.

A free kick does not come from free play. The wall is in place and does a little jump, the keeper assesses the trajectory of the ball off the boot and commits to a move to block where it will end up. The wall tries to block the shot away from the goal or get a sufficient deflection to send it off goal.

An own goal from an inadequate deflection counts for the team just as much as a real goal.

It wasn't significant because it didn't deflect the ball outside the net.

Watch it on a pc. The deflection is clear and obvious.

tldr
i dont have the autism levels that you possess to keep up this stupid shit

>the keeper assesses the trajectory of the ball off the boot
99 times out of 100 the keeper can't see the ball until it's over the wall. You haven't watched one football match in your life, let alone played.

>that logic

So by what you're saying if a striker's shot is going in the bottom right corner, it hits a defender's leg and goes into the bottom left corner, that wasn't a signficant deflection because the ball wasn't deflected outside the net?

Soccer is a team sport. Put the egos down. An own goal counts for the team and that's all that matters.

Are you saying Messi tried to get the ball deflected on purpose? Are you austitic?

the only difference is you opened your fucking eyes lad
this thread makes me realise how many of you clearly need glasses, i hope youre not squinty chinks

Don't project your amateur keeping skills onto professionals. Your park football may be slow enough for the vision impaired to wait until the ball passes the wall to have enough time to react, the mens game does not.

Mate, you don't know shit about football and it shows. Just save yourself the embarassement and close the thread.

Free kickers shoot hard partly so the ball can push through wall resistance and still be on goal despite taking a deflection. Messi had no choice but to kick close to the wall, a deflection is always a possibility and will often be to the advantage of the shooter because it means the goalie will be committed to the wrong spot, like what happened here.

This is where the thread should have ended

Its really not lad. You see what you want to see and then make pointless cricket analogies.

You are not on an elite level and have no conception of the speed of the game, the hard limits of reaction times, and the absolute necessity of vision. Your park football norms are not the standards of professionals.

You are wrong. The deflection is clear and obvious and easily sighted on first viewing.

I am talking about professional football, so read again:

>get btfo
>make a reddit joke after btfo
>call people redditors after no one gets the joke
>btfo again
Kill yourself.

i think the deflection is quite obvious, but it was a goal so it doesn't matter.

wouldnt have gone in without it tho

Just like its clear and obvious these roads are at different angles when in reality they are the exact same image?

If it was clear and obvious there wouldnt be this much debate about it lad.

Attached: 6FBCD4BA-F1B9-4B10-8B99275B8304A514_source.jpg (590x421, 68K)

that's impossible to determine.

>HUGE deflection
it doesn't even change the rotation of the ball

Alisson had his hand where the ball was gonna go naturally, messi took it much higher out of his reach.

Then why didnt the keeper save the shot?

there is one alien in the crowd, can you find it?

who fucking cares. The fk itself doesn't make him the goat. It's everything else

>Alisson had his hand where the ball was gonna go naturally,
please show me how you came to this conclusion

>knowing what's going on on reddit
Just outted yourself faggot. Go back and stay there bitch.

because he put a shit wall to begin with

You may have a neurological impairment that prevents you from seeing the obvious deflection that is clear and apparent at all angles and all perspectives filmed from multiple different lengths.

And because it deflects.

Sell your disgusting apple shite

With this logic every single free kick goalin history in the top corner should havebeen saved.

Yes it does

Because reddit is sucking Pissi''s limp dick and it loves it.

no the wall was too centered

So every free kick that goes in is a great freekick? Because without that deflection it was getting saved

iToddler BTFO

you can clearly see that the spin is the same

Are you sure its not you. You don't have to keep stubbornly digging yourself in because your deduction skills have been exposed by several different anons here.
>muh seaming off the pitch

From the angle directly behind messi the supposed change in ball rotation disappears.

>pissifag coping this much

you want to make a list of deflectnaldo's goals? you will cry

6th ballon d'or incoming

that's what happens when your players are choke artists

Attached: D5gq_C4WAAEH-Eq.png (541x363, 251K)

>without that deflection it was getting saved
I disagree. The change of the spin and trajectory is negligible if it even exists. This is the only camera angle you can even see a suggestion of a deflection. It looks like the ball brushes the shirt's fabric at most.

It changes and the ball goes upwards for a few frames.

scousers are in such hard denial right now lmao
you got dicked by the cheese pizza manlet, just accept it

>only camera angle
i can actually see it in two

MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI MESSI

the spin has the same speed and hat a fuckign shit thread lmao, if that was penaldo nobody would care

>this is still going on
beware of optical illusions, the perspective of an angled recording of a television can be quite deceiving

Attached: Photoshop_2019-05-02_17-53-52.png (1201x645, 1.91M)

If you say so, then that's 2 out of about 10. I feel it's too small for people to be saying it gets saved without it though. If you can calculate the change in position of the ball going into the goal caused by such a small deflection and be certain whether or not the keeper saves it then fuck me you've got better maths than me.

>I feel it's too small for people to be saying it gets saved without it though
i agree

No optical illusion makes a ball suddenly spin faster after passing a player as can be seen here

cringe

See what moron?

t.retard

Go back on your argie proxy and then head to reddit straight after

you would actually be surprised at how powerful some illusions are

THIS

Different guy you fucking monkey

>xG

>if he didnt score he wouldn't have scored
Some very profound insights on Yea Forums.com

Why do people arguing for it being deflected always post low quality webms recorded with a phone from a TV?

post some more high quality webms then.

It's actually a very clear bounce and you are retarded if you don't see it.
Doesn't make Messi any worse though, could have gone in even without the bounce.

what's this autism?

i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556743528845.webm
i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556743755650.webm

the thing that gets me is -- if Messi had scored this free kick and there wasn't this tiny deflection on it, if there was a yard if space between the ball and the wall, it wouldn't matter

Twain, the Portuguese posters and that retarded Uruguayan/Argentine (I can never remember which he is) would still be crying and freebleeding about something. Anything. They would claw at some vacuous bullshit and wrap it around themselves and try their hardest to use it to win some imaginary argument that they're having with the world.

Quite sad really. Messi might not be the actual GOAT, but he's clearly a better footballer than Cristiano Ronaldo (although obviously he is excellent) and these lads are just depriving themselves of the joy we get from watching him.

Its the proxy loser's way of coping with the fact that Messi has surpassed Penaldo at free kicks.

Let's assume the wall is positioned correctly, covering the straight line to goal. The kicker should aim for the hardest kick that gets the ball in the net, in order to prevent GK reaching it. Adding curve to the kick slows the ball down, but it's acceptable tradeoff when the alternative is hitting the wall. Overdoing it looks amateurish as the GK has time to easily catch it.

That means the ideal trajectory would just about *brush* the shoulder of the outermost defender, either changing the trajectory slightly without slowing the ball down significantly or ideally adding even more rotation to the ball causing the ball to continue changing trajectory right to the end.

Messi brushing the wall isn't "dumb luck". It's a consequence of aiming for the hardest (=straightest) kick past the wall.

If you complain about it, you should also think less of everyone who score via deflection from goal posts.

Messi punched a dude to get that freekick dumbass, everything about it is bs

Lmao imagine being an iPhone pleb

right on cue. Thanks for proving my point without a shred of irony.

It was obstruction, retard. Learn the rules. The punching is irrelevant because the obstruction happens first.

those show the situation from further away, plus not in slow motion. it would obviously be much more difficult to detect in these webms, not easier. the deflection is more easily seen from the two webms you quoted since they have the proper angle as well. also, look at the spin of the ball here

>manlets with no argument

>change in the spin of the ball
*ball has a left spin*
*after passing the wall it still has a left spin*
so the cope makes you imagine things now? you should propably go see a doctor

it doesnt just change spin direction after contact on the shoulder though. it actually moves to the side

>Canadian that never ever played football irl and doesn't know the rules

how does this shitty screenshot indicates the contact is an illusion

>those show the situation from further away
It's the same video. Except it's the raw footage. Instead of a phone filming on a TV.

honest question, how far was the wall? It looks like 10m at least. Any broadcast had the circle displayed?

whether it's the same video or not is irrelevant here, because it's totally different distances, and differ angles, where the deflection would be harder to spot.

show the raw footage of these two scenes then.

it indicates the recording is warped as fuck even the goalpost is curving inward

it's literally the same video just recorded off a TV by a phone at a skewed angle
what you think the magic twitter man who originally uploaded it had a better view of the goal

Attached: freekick.png (1281x2021, 2.88M)

It makes a difference. Filming on a TV adds all sort of distortions, including camera movement that isn't there, giving the illusion of a different ball trajectory.

Only way to tell is with static planes.

Same thing for the other .webm, it's skewed to hell and back, but it's the same recording.

Attached: freekick2.png (1281x2021, 2.85M)

But I had an argument - that retards would use anything at all to invalidate Messi and his achievements - and you proved it right in your post.

It's very easy to understand, for non Canadians. But I'll put it even simpler. The fact that you tried to gloss over the free kick by arguing about something facile, something irrelevant, something stupid (just like I said you would) actually proves the point I was making.

In conclusion, not only do/did I have an argument, but YOU were the one that turned that argument into less of a question and more of a statement. Thanks buddy.

>it's literally the same video
it literally isn't? different angles, distance, zoom, slow mo.
get the raw video for these two then, let's see what it shows.

cope

this is the strangest form liverpool fan delusion has ever taken?

Scousers whining on social media about this goal being a deflected shot is an example of why nobody likes Liverpool and we just want to see them fail in every competition

He is actually right and you know it.
You are just biased.
Besides, stop trying to teach football like you are an expert, your cunt hasnt been relevant at it for almost 30 years.
Hasta te la ganamos en tu casa, cebollita.

>tf
>tp

umm sweatie that's not how it works

BETTER ANGLE at meatspin.fr
The debate is now OVER.
You're welcome.

it literally is, just recorded by some idiot standing next to his TV
i.4pcdn.org/sp/1556744596566.webm

Attached: kick overlayed.webm (1280x720, 1.75M)

you can see it go wider after passing the shoulder here too

that's a different webm, but it doesn't matter since they both show a change in direction and change of spin of the ball, just like the tv recorded one.

curve looks perfectly fine on the view from behind, though, the one that isn't angled against the curve of the shot and doesn't move horizontally
ball doesn't look like it's spinning any faster or slower on the view from the right which has the ball in a good focus that doesn't make it a blur for most of the duration

1) Clubs. This is what matters the most. 90% of football is played by clubs. This takes most of the time, not just 2 weeks every 4 years. Argentine clubs are infinitely superior to Uruguayan ones. So, all year round, I am enjoying while you're seething.

2) Argentines abroad. This is also what happens 90% of the time. Uruguayan players can't even begin to compare to the Argentine ones winning tournaments every year. Now there are even Argentine managers making the rounds in Europe. So, all year round, I am enjoying while you're seething.

3) National team. Argentina has made it to several finals and they came down to the write. If you make it to a final and lose on penalties, eventually you'll win. I am young and I know I'll see Argentina winning several tournaments. Uruguay hasn't made it to a World Cup Final since... 1950... LOL

4) Youth. The Argentine team almost wins the U20 tournament and won the U17 tournament. New young players just keep coming up.

Di Stefano won 5 CL in a row scoring goals in 5 consecutive finals (7 in total, all-time top scorer in CL finals)

It must suck to be Uruguayan and seethe all year round about Argentine success in football.

>types an essay on a basket weaving forum
You are totally not seething

Attached: 1554411750069.jpg (643x820, 80K)

Has there ever been this much asshurt over a deflection before?

tl;dr Argentina is better than Uruguay at every facet of football (clubs, players, national team, youth teams) and you're seething all year round and clinging to medals from the 20s

HE PURPOSELY DID THIS TO TAKE ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE FACT HE PUNCHED FABINHO. HE SHOULD BE BANNED FROM THE 2ND LEG.

People in 50 years will watch CR on youtube and wonder how anyone rated him

Yes, the ball grazed his shoulder. The speed of the ball and curve of the ball changed ever so slightly. It's 'lucky' that it went right in the upper 90 but regardless it was still a well taken freekick by messi. Don't know why people on this website have to pick sides on such trivial things and argue over it for hours on end.

>a fantastic freekick that was going to go in anyway as Allisson would not have reached it
>D-D-D-EFLECTION!!! DOESN'T COUNT
Fucking hell.

based

Attached: not ok.jpg (882x308, 67K)

I hope you all voted today.

>as Alisson would not have reached it

Cope. He barely missed it here . The deflection here was more than big enough to take it away from his hand.

how do you know he would have stopped it?

kek

Mate, the deflection did not cause the ball to move 25cm away from his hand, it might have done a bit, but not that much. At best, AT BEST, Allison would have got his finger tips to it and it would have still gone in due to the power. Either way, it was 30m away or so, Allisson should have done better.

>1 goal by an easy tap in after the ball bounced back from the post
>1 own goal by a defender
>GOAT EVER BEST EVER HE WILL WIN THE WC THIS TIME I SWEAR

LMAO....

Attached: 1465236047585.jpg (718x1084, 245K)

>14CAs and 2WCs are better than 15CAs and 4WCs
>argentine intellectuals
No wonder your cunt is Venezuela tier right now.

Messi himself said he was lucky to find the corner

jajajajjajajajaja (laughing in mexican)

>4 WC's
Jajajajajajajajajajajajajajaajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja

get mimi

Attached: NoEraDefleccion.webm (488x684, 584K)

Any slight deflection going at that speed is going to make a huge impact on where the ball trajectory

This settles all the autistic hatred

no deflection at all

still changes trajectory

>no deflection
based messi

Because ot went top bins?

>not using clover

bump for exposing the haters

imagine being a faggot who doesn't use clover or omnichan

Imagine being a phoneposting zoomer faggot

that's way too slowed down. at faster speeds you can see the ball glancing off the shoulder.

that's when the ball hits.

Attached: derflection.png (442x624, 463K)

>thats way too slowed down
>here's a pic of the deflection, nevermind the super slow mo
brainlet retards

Theres really no way you can tell if thats touching him or not.

On what earth does slo mo mess up your perception of direction?

the ball's skipping around in the slow-mo. it's a lot easier to see the ball's direction suddenly change when the motion is fluid.

Webm related
If you're switching proxies you can post as frequently as you want you fucking retarded abo

Attached: madmax-thats-bait.webm (1912x792, 358K)

we need to go deeper

didnt deflect but grazed gomez , una rosada mane

messi is such a goat

Ask Joe Gomez on twitter if it touched him

woah we got a timetravler from 2011 here

nah just an idiot with an iphone

>can't watch webms on an iPhone
literally what is VLC

I dunno I just remember dumb iphoneposters complaining about webms for years now, take it up with them not me

I don't like Barcelona but this is sinking to the level of a messoy shitposter. The fucking minutiae of how "pure" goals are doesn't fucking matter. I don't understand where this retarded mentality comes from. The goal is worth exactly the same wether there's a deflection or not.

Attached: 1546882260688.jpg (200x342, 18K)

>dumb iphoneposters
some people care about not having their data sold for ads.

dumb iphoneposter

it doesn't matter cause liverpool are going to get embarrassed at home anyways.

Attached: this does not fucking slip.webm (854x480, 761K)

Basednaldo fags cannot fathom the greatest free kick in champions league history came off Messi's foot

Do you realize that whenever a murrifat makes a LARPy post about football every european and south american on Yea Forums cringes?

is this the new /cric/ thread?

UEFA needs to force a rematch NOW

The deflection was calculated
All according to Messi's keikaku

>2019
>Using Apple products

Attached: its-over-itoddler.webm (853x480, 1.17M)