Why are they still known as a 'football continent' despite having such abysmal performance against real teams (Europe)?

Why are they still known as a 'football continent' despite having such abysmal performance against real teams (Europe)?

Attached: shutterstock-495113257[1].jpg (728x425, 20K)

because they have nothing else going for them

there's at least 3 continents in that picture

South America starts at the Rio Grande and you dumb spics should stop pretending otherwise.

People breathe football over there, and some of the flashiest most iconic players have come from South America

>and some of the flashiest most iconic players have come from South America
Yeah my grandfather still talks about them

Messi, Suarez, Coutinho, Agüero, Godin, Firmino etc. etc.

Brazil: no world cups/copa americas since 2007
Argentina: no world cups/copa americas since 1993

Who is Messi
Also there's a million countries in europe and only a few are better than us. Germoney, spain, maybe italy and the africa france

All those big names and they never win anything. Not to mention only Messi is somewhat relevant.

Are you talking about national teams?

MESSI

Even England would batter Argentina nowadays lol

>Argentina: no world cups/copa americas since 1993
We have reached many finals since then, not really our fault that Higuain exists

Yes, though coming to think of it, what the fuck have any Sudaca clubs ever achieved, other than killing each other?

Nope

Yep Yep

Why is Netherlands considered a powerhouse

GET OUT

You know its true.
What club are you a fan of?

>Dutch education

Being better than Neverland in every way. Your country would have fared better under us

If they had the money to retain their best players then they'd be able to compete in club competitions