He wants >his team to lose a match

United cannot win the title. They can, however, pretend City from winning it. However, City are easily dismissed as an 'oil club' and therefore 'don't count'. Liverpool, however, are only slightly behind United in terms of trophies and prestige (if you include meme pre-PL titles and stuff as 'relevant'). Therefore, United would much prefer City to win than Liverpool. However, it doesn't matter. City will slip one way or another, Liverpool won't.

Out of date but you can see.

Attached: Liverpool are best.jpg (978x590, 203K)

It started when they built the canal

>tf
>tp
Why would a person in another country care about a team in another league? Go back to Shamrock Rovers, laddy.

How about you go fuck yourself.

he is kinda right though... i guess?

But the season is not over for them, they still can take a champions league qualifying spot
And to do that they must win
Why the fuck would you want to lose
>we skipped out on the champions league for next season but at least we influnced the league so our minor rivals won and our major rivals lost
cuck mentality

The Irish is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a Paddy, Potatofucker, Criminal, Unionist, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Plastic and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

european cup should be worth 15 points tbqh

also, maybe you should put extra points to teams that have had continuous success. Villa for example have only won a league title since 1910 yet they're 4th.

ahahahah i'm lving so much what is happening to united. no fergie, no party.
watch them miss out on champions league and woodward signing bale and bruno fernandes or joao felix ahahahahahah

notice how united "fans" are real quiet with their disapproval of this thread because they know how cucked they are having this mentality

imagine wanting to lose out on top 4 just so a rival doesn't win the league so another rival can lmao

no, it's because they're both large, industrial cities very close to each other.
football rivalries aren't always between two parts of the same city. rivalries between neighboring towns are very common too.
See Benfica x Porto, Schalke x Dortmund, for example.

Tbh this kinda sounds like Edward Said's theory on orientalism, humans tend to define themselves first and foremost by excluding themselves from others.

It literally started when they built the Manchester Shipping Canal. It meant they didn't have to send their stuff to Liverpool docks. Manchester started this rivalry by being greedy industrialist cunts, the football stuff follows on and also Manchester is jealous af and cannot cope with Liverpool superiority in culture and the arts. Also, Liverpool is an Irish city.

>Liverpool is an Irish city.

Attached: cringey pepe.png (399x322, 42K)

Hope we get smashed tomorrow. Finishing top 4 now would make our team look half decent and then the necessary changes won't happen in summer (see finishing 2nd despite being dog shit last season).

the beatles suck though

irrelevant, they had more influcne on music than any manc act ever did. that gets to the manc

>Liverpool is an Irish city.

Attached: lv.png (482x500, 383K)

based false flag making both paddies and britbongs seethe

yeah because finishing 6th the season before last & 5th before that one really galvanised the club into fixing all it's problems, huh?

worst post of all time

seething scousers desperate for other teams to stop city because they couldn't

Attached: 1542577411146.png (251x398, 111K)

Can't think of one culturally significant band/person/invention to come out of liverpool that isn't The Beatles, who are shit.

All I ever hear is Liverpool capital of culture blah blah but that's just a spastics badge they give to shit tip towns to try and polish a turd, if you consider Dundee and Hull have also won this, it's clearly not worth a shilling.

>City will slip one way or another, Liverpool won't.

Attached: 21241424142.png (633x758, 16K)

they don't, but they were Everton fans

implying winning the league in the 70s/80s is the same as 90s/00s

if Liverpool is an Irish city then so is Manchester. Dirty old town and all that. The truth is the Irish made up a fair portion of the work force in Manc, Brum, L'pool back in the day.

>superiority in culture and the arts
oh no no no

>She didn't love him
>She didn't want to hold his hand

Lots of coping Liverpool fans ITT :^)

nah. irrelevant boomer music

>united lose
>"w-we we're j-just pretending to be shit!!!11 get cucked liverpoo!!!!111"
>finish 6th
>"HAHAHAHAHAHA LIVERPOOL HAD A SHIT SEASON"
yeah sorry, i just dont get this logic
t. championship team fan

>Liverpool superiority in culture and the arts
It requires some serious mental gymnastics to call alcoholism, inbreeding, and unemployment "culture and arts".

I dont think it should be based on continuous success. I think adding a weight back then would work. I think football has progressed and got more difficult over time that it should be weighed less the further back you go.

Although you can make the argument that it was equally difficult but not at the same level it is today. Either way continuing success is a bad metric to add to this because it's taking into account consistency rather than results