How much would he cost today?
How much would he cost today?
Is Beckham still popular in the UK?
The tabloids still cover his every move. You don’t hear regular people talk about him much.
150 mil
around 222m
The same as CR7 you pay for the hype outside of the field.
he's now like 10 percent of white players compared to about 70, so a lot more. i'd guess 1 billion
2003 Beckham would probably go for about 200m at least
£200 mil but talent wise £90 mil
If we are talking media booming, 150m, if we are talking real talent, 90p
Coutinho went for £150 and Beckham is twice the player he is.
He might be overrated but becks was a two times Balon'or runner up and lets be honest Becks should have won it over Rivaldo at 2000.
So £250
This
Mahrez cost 60m.
Safe to say D-Becks would be 100
>the english Coutinho
so whatever Barca paid for Coutinho
What did he mean by this?
120
Why was he so popular? He was just good footballer, far from the best ones of his time. Was it because of his looks? Seems odd that physical appearance can add so much to your market value. Ronaldo has been one of the best footballers for 10 years and you could argue that he also has a very good appearance, but I doubt that had much to with his value being so high.
>on field
Muh free kicks
>off field
Muh good looks and celeb relationships
>far from the best ones of his time
That’s where you’re wrong.
>Beckham wasn't elite
plebeian opinion
He was one of the best at Man U at the time but, internationally, he was never Eusebio / Pele / Cruyff / Ronaldo class.
hes a jew lad
Is that Luke Chadwick?
no
he is a solid midfielder but not more. no more than coutinho or vidal for sure.
0.7 Pogbas
Every man I know wants to get shagged by him.
talent-wise no more than 40 mil
marketing-wise, a solid 250 mil plus tip
He was a great footballer and marketable as fuck, if 34 YO Ronaldo is worth 110mil and Coutinho 120mil then prime becks is worth 150mil+
>Becks should have won it over Rivaldo at 2000
'no'
Rivaldo was overrated, only had a left foot too, Beckham was the better footballer, Rivaldo just had the Brazilian flair
>talent-wise no more than 40 mil
Brainlet
He was a great free kick taker, fast and had good composure for the most part. He is probably top 10 maybe top 5 of his generation.
He's still the most well known footballer here. Even after not playing for 6 years.
>Beckham was the better footballer
Le bendy free kick man is one of the most overrated footballers of all time.
The first true football celeb.
Overrated player
If you strop away Beckham's free-kicks, corners, crosses and corners he was comfortably worse than Phil Neville.
>Coutinho
Lmao.
Becks nowadays, where only paceniggers can be wingers, would basically be De Bruyne, but better.
First popstar footballer since George Best and he happened to play for the team that won literally everything including the treble. Bigger than US steel.
>le good crossing and good free kick man
he would never play in today's game, all right winger today are pacebabbies and becks was slow as molasses
>if you ignore the things he was good at, he wasn't very good
Brainlet.
>if you take away his best attributes he's shit
I hate these kind of arguments on Yea Forums.
based retard
It's always >muh corners, muh free kicks when in fact Becks was a great goal scorer, a genuinely good all round passer and an absolutely clutch model professional
Of course not but he was one of the best of his generation.
Seeing as João Felix is apparently worth 120M, Beckham would be like 200M
He's not wrong though.
he played as a CM for RM and was good
What's the modern equivalent to a Spice Girl for him to marry? A Kardashian?
One of the GoT actors like Maisie Williams
His marketing abilities alone would be 150mil, not including whatever ability he brings to the squad.
>Becks should have won it over Rivaldo at 2000.
>Let's be honest.