Why can't England produce players like them anymore?
Why can't England produce players like them anymore?
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
In all honesty i think it's because football isn't as popular as it used to be.
This is why teams are relying on more foreign players because the locals don't really care so much.
niggers can't play in midfield
soccer is gay lol
>foreign players because the locals don't really care so much.
Not true. More money means you can afford to expand your talent pool. You're always going to get better players the wider your pool to draw from is.
1 > 2 > 3
Ruben Loftus Cheek is already better than all of them
>meme chelsea youth players
"no"
Dele Alli is already better than all of them
Might I add, austerity.
A lot of schools are underfunded, so a lot of after school clubs are being cut, as a result, many kids just don't do sports anymore.
all you need is a patch of grass and a ball
>football isnt as popular and kids dont play it anymore
>england youth is having a spiel of success they didnt have for a long time if ever (inb4 muh 66)
error 404
Alli is the next Lampard
Loftus-Cheek is the next Gerrard
The closest i can get for the next Scholes is probably Hughes
You have to take into account administration costs.
Schools are absolutely right for budget. Some schools close early on Fridays because they can't afford to keep open for the whole time.
We've had 10 years of aggressive cuts, shits bad man
I know what you mean but that wasn't the point I was trying to make. At least for football, any poor kid around the world can play and does because all you need is a ball (Brazil favelas, Africa, etc.) but why isn't it the same in more developed countries? You mentioned austerity cuts in Britain. I know in America to play youth "soccer" at a higher level parents have to pay like crazy to be on better teams.
Point I'm making is, football doesn't need to be tied to money at all but it seems to be in more developed countries
I think these three playing at the same time is an anomaly. You'd be better off asking the question, how did England produce these three players?
>england youth is having a spiel of success they didnt have for a long time if ever (inb4 muh 66)
You're missing the point. Look at the "England" youth having tons of success. Raheem Sterling, Marcus Rashford, Dele Alli....they don't represent the majority of the English population in the slightest.
>eulogising players who failed for England
smells like boomer in here
Those two statements do not contradict each other, though.
this.
Any zoomer on England today would be even worse in their toles. Success can be as much down to circumstance as ability
They’ve already been exposed.
>Success can be as much down to circumstance as ability
The circumstances were that they brought petty club rivalries into the national team and didn't give a shit about playing for England. Didn't help that the manager was a fraud, either.
Also didn't help that they all played the exact same position. I thought England was at their best when they had Hargreaves at DM
Because Brits have been conditioned to believe that wanting to see homegrown players in their club is racist and xenophobic. There are clubs in the Premier that regularly only have 1 or 2 domestic players in their starting 11.
they too tierd playing video games all night.
White men are being systematically emasculated in Western countries.
Hargreaves was based. Too bad his knees were shit and he was actually Canadian
Different strokes. Kids in first worlds countries need to be motivated to play sports, because they could just as well go play Fortnite and watch Youtube videos, or whatever else. Poor kids in Brazil play futbol to escape their miserable lives. In South America, foundations who look to remove kids from the streets or free them from child labor do so by building football clubs, so kids have someplace to go, socialize, be supervised and have something to eat.
Yeah that's definitely what it is, Abramovich and Sheik Masour are notoriously SJW.
Go back to /pol/ you conspiracy theory faggot
Those are all senior players dumb ass. He means the U-21s and below
True. When I was in England, all the talk in the pubs was about darts. Saw a really heated debate about Jocky Wilson vs Eric Bristow.
"Only 53 players - less than a quarter of all starters beginning games for top-flight clubs in Premier League game week 14 - were eligible to represent England, down from 55 last weekend."
bbc.com
Stay woke bitch boy.
isn't playing football in England rather complicated because of the rain?
I don't think people can just improvise matches at any park at any time
and modern kids play less sports, sports have to compete with videogames and all internet based entertainment these days. perhaps a kid that would have been a football genius 20 years ago now is obsessed with some youtuber instead
Makes perfect sense why you might think the reason for that is a secret race-baiting agenda to include mostly Spanish, Brazilian, and Argentine players but the truth is that most English players are shit m9
Kante?
The truth is that brits are being etnhically replaced by pakis and africans just like the rest of Europe
based and breivikpilled
Different qualities to those 3.
World class at winning the ball back, fairly average ball player.
They are still producing exactly that: 2 out of 3 English players are average ones with the big media behind them because muh national team.
Imagine being surrounded by literally thousands of football clubs and an increasing amount of boys (and girls!) teams and saying this. The number of registered players across the country has never been higher and attendances have been steadily climbing across the leagues.
there are tons of other black players that fit "World class at winning the ball back, fairly average ball player" but kante is not one of them
Kante is a white man what are you talking about?
We've got Chilwell, Maddison, maguire and Barnes in the Leicester team. True there are a bunch of minority youngsters too, but it's not all 'n'gubus' out there.
Sterling and Kane are better than Scholes
>*wins nothing despite being a "golden generation"*
Because coaches aren't trying to make players better, they just need them to fit in their system
>Marcus Rashford
Literally has no other international eligibility, he can only play for England.
Sterling should be playing for Jamaica and Dele hates his nog dad.
School is a fucking waste of time. The sit there teaching you useless shit you’ll forget within a year and trying to condition you to accept fags and Muslims rather that teaching logic, critical reasoning, or developing marketable skills.
>Because Brits have been conditioned to believe that wanting to see homegrown players in their club is racist and xenophobic
Literally nobody thinks that, homegrown players are celebrated.
>Le 23 year old prospect man with a broken back
This
too much english workhorse in them. modern game is more expansive than that now
>trippier
youtube.com
Because of stuff like this. Kids don't want to play football anymore, they want to be inside playing Fortnite, Call of Duty and FIFA. A poster in this thread mentioned the weather being too shit to play sometimes. 10+ years ago, kids would still play football in the rain, but now they can't be arsed because they can stay inside and play Xbox until the odd few days when the weather is nice and their Mum's kick them out for the day.
The ones that really play football now are from poor london suburbs and have families that can't afford to have their kids in all day, sucking the the electricity and buying them the latest vidya every month. AKA, black kids with single Mums. I'm not pinpointing it down to race, but we aren't going to get players like Scholes or Gerrard as much anymore.
Good post.
you might not add
because austerity started after the lampards of today would have developed
*ahem*
because now all they can produce is brown players with hyphenated surnames.
That would explain the huge amount of Paki premier League stars then