Its safe to say, previous UCL titles don't count now

>5-1
>w-we were better, t-that goal would have been the turning point even tho liverpool raped us home and away

>aguero is offside
>>>wrongly ruled offside
>bottling it to spuds

Attached: images (5).jpg (479x640, 29K)

Someone care to explain to me how Erkisen's pass, mildly deflected by a city player, can be called an offside on aguero receiving it? Anyone got the rule book?

actually its shit

that wouldn't have changed anything for either goal?
llorente's could never have been overturned if the ref couldn't even watch it, and for the goal at the end the ref was just told over the mic it was offside

The arm was glued to the body at that moment so even if there was contact at that moment it's still a valid goal.

>mildly deflected by a city player
aguero was offside when that happened so it's offside

>mildly deflected

Attached: ohno.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

this. it wasn't deliberate, he didn't gain any advantage from the contact with the arm, and it was tucked so it wasn't in an "unnatural" position

it wasn't mildly deflected

You are right, I mis-remembered the offside goal going to VAR
I guess the correct thing to do would be to take over the VAR room forcefully

>didn’t gain any advantage
The ball went into the goal you mong lol

>Everyone stops celebrating and waits
>Closes on refs stupid face
>It's not even guaranteed he's got it right
It killed the most important moment of the game

>bottling a guaranteed quadruple against kaneless Spuds at home

Attached: bottled.jpg (1200x787, 369K)

They don't even show replays, just the ref's mong face as he's waiting for someone to tell him. Boring af

yeah but not because of the tiny flick it took off his arm, it went in because it smashed into his hip where it was heading anyway

It was though, Eriksen literally booted it back towards his own goal with someone getting a slight toe to it before it landed at aguerro's feet. Shouldn't it be like own goals, i.e. if the ball was basically heading in the same place, the touch is not counted?

>A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:• interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched bya team-mate or [...]

>touched by a team-mate
>touched
Offside.

Attached: var pep.webm (1280x720, 2.98M)

>Everyone stops celebrating and waits
No everybody keeps celebrating, if the goal is rightfully ruled out they stop celebrating if the goal is legal they celebrate even more.

the ball did not touch his arm

yes, it's still the start of VAR tho' it will be better and better overtime, the public will be informed of what's going on

JUST

>angular elbow vs flat side
>hard bone vs softer muscle
Ok

>actually quotes rule book

thanks lad.

It did, but it literally doesn’t matter, he had it tight to his body so there was no instance where this could have been a handball.

you can't score with your arm lol, doesn't matter where it is it's still "gaining an advantage"

got the video? from what i remember watching it live the ball was neatly under the arm/hand onto the hip, if it had touched the arm at all it wouldn't have bounced the way it did off his body.

what do you want him to do with his arm, fucking cut it?

>Handling the ball

>Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with the ball with the hand or arm.

>The following must be considered:

>• the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)
>• the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)
>• the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an offence

>The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other player outside the penalty area. Inside their penalty area, the goalkeeper cannot be guilty of a handling offence incurring a direct free kick or any related sanction but can be guilty of handling offences that incur an indirect free kick.

You're thinking of pic related, which is not enforced until June.

Attached: Screenshot_21.png (701x663, 85K)

>you can't score with your arm lol
You are right, but he didn't score with the arm. He scored with the hip (even if the ball touched his arm before that).

There's no discussion. It was a legal goal.

whatever it takes to win, back in my day we'd be prepared to do that no questions asked

Why does the last bit look like overly dramatic acting from the silent era?

>disses other 3 (You)'s for the thing he could have googled himself
Lazy nip

Why clean your own toilets when there are eastern europeans who will do it for (yous)?

nah he scored with his arm, they had another angle they didn't show at the time which made it clear go look it up on twitter or whatever

It doesn't matte, under the current rules it's not a handball offence. See Koscienly vs. Burnley for an even more blatant example.

The sheer amount of emotion and adrenaline he felt when he thought they scored doesn't go away immediately, thereby you are more prone to react in a manner that would otherwise be considered "overly dramatic".

Attached: 1540043295575.jpg (1024x683, 171K)

>kaneless
spuds play better without him

>Te concept of reviewing baffles and frightens the semen slurper

dont know why you make VAR such a big deal

one angle clearly shows it bounces off his arm to land on his hip

>Closes on refs stupid face

Attached: urkel.gif (320x213, 883K)

VAR makes the robbery have more legitimacy
>it was totally not rigged, he used VAR, bro

Only if no premier league titles count until next season

Correct

>suddenly
0 CL finals without messi

>Liverpool finally win PL
>it's immediately wiped from the history books

Attached: 1541628487679.jpg (1280x720, 132K)