*is refballed*
not a city customer but let's be honest here, llorente's goalis invalid, the ball clearly bounces off llorente's arm then lands on llorente's hip. when the referee checked on VAR he had only on angle available to make his judgement
*is refballed*
Jayden Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Matthew Gomez
He checked three different angles
Noah Robinson
whats he supposed to do, stop his arm from existing?
Elijah Brown
Then he’s even more of a fraud. The ball clearly changes directions twice on his body.
Alexander Hernandez
Never touched his arm Pierre
Julian Campbell
Quite simply put, you are wrong.
William Sanders
It clearly clipped his wrist, but it didn't change the direction of the ball or creat an unfair advantage because it hit his hip 0.001 seconds later and no City player was ever going to get in the way to stop it if his arm were not there
Eli Cook
Under the new rules that goal wouldn‘t have stood. But these rules aren‘t implemented yet
Connor Jenkins
I saw him check for a long time an irrelevant angle for too long, while the side angle clearly shows the ball hits the arm first
no, that still makes it an invalid goal
Jonathan Morris
oh it totally did, i'm too lazy to find a webm of it but it's sure as fuck the arm changed the trajectory of the ball
Eli Anderson
twitter.com
It's less about his wrist than his elbow. It influences the direction of the ball toward the goal. We saw that the ref didn't even see this angle
Austin Cooper
Fair enough. But he is actively moving his arm away from the ball in that clip. That's ball to hand and a valid goal
Andrew Cook
Anyway it's simple! if the referee is told to check VAR it's because the guys in charge of VAR think the referee missed something and his given the chance to change his opinion to "make it right"
Jackson Roberts
i think the austrian user is right, there is handball but the intention isn't here, but in the future it will be a disallowed goal intentional handball or not
Eli Collins
To be fair he tries to keep his arm near his body and it didn't really change trajectory, besides he didn't even saw the ball, that 100% valid goal
Julian James
He was pushed from behind. His arm was directly against his body. If it hit his stomach instead of his arm it would have been the exact same outcome.
Wyatt Reed
>people still mad despite VAR clearly showing it hits his hip
This is becoming very pathetic now lads.
Brayden Sanchez
>the ball clearly bounces off llorente's arm
You are an idiot, which I suppose is expected from a frog.
Could it have hit Llorente's arm? Possibly. Was it clear cut? No. I don't expect a moron like yourself to ever understand.
Jeremiah Scott
>Was it clear cut? No
So what's that then >You are an idiot, which I suppose is expected from a frog.
How ironic
Jordan James
Again, not clear cut. Idiots like you are so braindead you can't even comprehend the meaning of "clear cut".
Keep voting Macron, it's what idiots like yourself are programmed to do.
Austin Johnson
OH NONONONO
Caleb Phillips
It could have been called as a handball but it's really borderline, Imagine if he did it in his own box, would it be a penalty?
Jaxon Thompson
Your moms ass bounced off my arm and then landed on my hips several times last night
Ian Hernandez
why are aussies so mentally weak? they always act like hysterical women
Leo Davis
>waaaah the aussie was mean to meeeeee
Jace Thomas
>VAR keeps making great decisions
>faggots still mad about it
Adrian Perez
if you think that's intentional handling you're a brainlet, simple as. what's the new rule going to be?
Noah Price
why are anglos so hysterical when you see us? that's some profound mental ownage
Ryan Cooper
City have earned the right to be refeballed as they've been gaming the system for years. Just karam innit
Colton Bennett
any handball will be handball, so this goal would have been cancelled. for penalties now, automatic pen if there is handball if the shot was on target or if the hand moves toward the ball if the shot is not on target
Isaac Moore
new rule says he needs to use his arm to make his body bigger, which he wasn't doing since it was tucked in
it definitely clipped the arm but it was not deliberate and didn't really affect the ball's movement. i mean the spirit of the rule is just to stop people using their arm to gain an advantage - he a) wasn't trying to handball it and b) didn't gain any direct advantage from the fact it clipped the arm. it wouldn't be at all fair to disallow it
Brandon Long
>didn't really affect the ball's movement.
Isaiah Evans
Lmao imagine having unlimited amounts of money and going out to spurs
Charles Cruz
Spurs that spent 0 this season.
Joshua Reed
doesn't matter. you can even score with your arm as long as it's not judged to be intentional
Jonathan Sullivan
Aaron Lewis
kek what are the french like when we call ligue 1 a farmers league. You all go apeshit
Bentley Young
No player can jump for the ball with their arm away from their body, just asking to get called for hand ball.
With this in mind he jumps with his arm tucked into his body. About 2 yards in front of him the ball is deflected off the head of walker and clips his arm, still tucked into his body.
Llorente did everything possible to minimise his arm and made no attempt to play the ball with his arm. Currently having arms is still legal in football (although next year any contact at all even without intent will be handball) so under the letter of the law this is a goal.