These 2 played so well. Where the fuck did it go wrong?

>PSG of england
Yea that makes sense

Doesnt matter because Tottenham was clinical with half the chances.

Attached: IMG_20190417_161814.jpg (2831x1886, 442K)

right here

Attached: son 6.jpg (718x781, 82K)

>feels like we’re the PSG of england
A smaller, sympathetic club turned into the oil-funded McDonalds of football?

Frankly, I was scared of Kevin.
Every time he got a ball, seemed to score a goal

Attached: 1540846391480.png (600x497, 8K)

The goals were down to individual errors plus refball. Hard to put that on Pep

yes a club everybody liked turn into a plastic shit club you are the PSG of England

Or they will collapse now

>Where the fuck did it go wrong?
when Aguero was born

Moron, you didn't get refballed
You got a penalty that you missed
You conceded to Son twice
Your offside goal was ruled offside

Sterling, B.Silva and KDB were the best yesterday.

Aguero missed a penalty, Laporte had a nightmare 5 minutes, Spurs scored a scrappy goal from a corner out of nowhere

The first 2 goals they conceded were literally Laporte's fault, nothing to do with the attacking setup.

the hilarious arrogance of thinking you can priorities the league cup over the away tie and just win by whatever score needed at home
also rumblings that time is up on city's cheating FFP and they're going to get hit hard, maybe thats why pep felt he needed to try and win the quadruple now

this
Reminder that he rested essential players in their away leg

>hey guise

Attached: city_laporte-750x410.jpg (750x410, 43K)

Racists living in his head rent-free. It distracts him from actually playing football.

And the ref missed the handball even with VAR. Totally not refball

Aguero's goal should have stood but the way offside works is retarded as it privileges shitty defenders/
.

spuds defence throughout that night was particularly bad even compared to city who conceded as much

Aguero was offside at the end but without VAR ref's used to have a good system in place to 'give the benefit of the doubt' to the attacker. it encouraged creative play and didn't let off bad defending for no reason whatsoever.

That defence was not tracking aguero. they weren't playing him offside. they got entirely lucky by the width of a big toe

Also VAR perspectives are shit. proven by the amount of squabbling that continues over the 'hand ball '. VAR should never have been introduced without being a foolproof neutral birds eye design like tennis

fuck city

>That defence was not tracking aguero. they weren't playing him offside. they got entirely lucky by the width of a big toe
Spurs had the ball you dumbell, eriksen made a bad pass that bounced off a city player

>feels like we’re the PSG of england
kek
you almost had me

shutup retards. that's like blaming manchester city's goals all on rose

To be fair, yeah. Danny Rose was at fault for literally all of them.

Laporte literally passed to Son in the two first goals.

This guy is a fucking hack and even if he's Messi's best friend he can't get a starting spot on the national team, really makes u think

>missed penalty
>offside

manchester city's second goal should've definitely been handled better by rose. tottenham had basically no more midfield after sissoko was injured

only the first goal. and it was a forced error because lucas was running towards his direction and laporte couldn't reach far enough to kick the ball away properly so all he could've done was kick it away from the net and hope for the best

they have no defense. Guardiola is a fraud

It went wrong when the VAR cunts allowed Llorente's handball goal to stand.
City were robbed.
Not even a City fan and it pissed me off.

a handball is handball if its intentional, his arm was stuck to his body, his arm didn't move toward the ball. the funny thing is that Laporte TOUCHED the ball bouncing off llorente's hip with his fingers.

>a handball is handball if its intentional
bullshit

wrong, in the future with the new rule any handball will be handball tho

Ederson is pretty poor too. People think he's good because muh clean sheets, but is the reason he concedes so little. His actual save percentage is really underwhelming.

If they played so well, why did they lost?

I think that's only in the case of a direct goal off the hand.

kys yourself

City is a plastic team

>why did a team that scored 4 goals lost
hmmm.....

It was all on Laporte, he single handedly cost City 3 goals.

That's in the future, in the present or rather in the past, that goal was valid, otherwise might as well invalidate all previous winners because there was no var

Remember when Pep first arrived and he made all the players wear identical clothes in their private lives? He's a proper fucking control freak and you just know that he's at home cutting himself right now over this COLOSSAL failure.

Attached: citeh.jpg (718x449, 69K)

oh, so they play Ajax next?

They met their first real opponent in the CL this season and bottled it

>Lyon
>Hoffenheim
>Shahktar
>Schalke
>Tottenham

Conceding 3 at home after losing the first leg it really isn't some kind of mystery why they didn't progress

so why is he currently having his best year ever for club and country?

the only reason sterling played well was because tottenham had no midfield which gave de bruyne free reign to basically control the midfield and pass the ball everywhere. if sissoko wasn't injured, he would've shut de bruyne out and manchester city would've only had 3 goals by the end of the match

god that kit is awful. looks like fucking pyjamas

thank god I'm not the only one