Son VS Park

Attached: 20190415_153627705357744581.jpg (678x381, 49K)

Park.

Attached: 1520406557453.jpg (620x465, 50K)

son is the better player, but he doesn't have the silverware park does. give son a couple years and i think he'll definitely surpass him.

Cha

Ahn Jung Hwan. He was pretty handsome too.

Attached: 7b18488210ceac9902987f3180809e93.jpg (498x527, 38K)

>playing for the spurs
>obtaining silverware
Pick one

i'm under the impression that spurs are kind of a cheap club who lets players go for high bids. is it unrealistic to think that a big foreign club might try and buy him in the next couple of years?

Park is le work hard man. Son is actually a good player, should fuck off Tottenham soon.

Son

park

Son the son of sun

cheater scumbag wanker

Park in son

>Asian Bran

He has bullied af by Italian players like Materazzi because of his smell of Kimchi after the world cup 2002

PARK PARK WHERE EVER YOU MAY BE

Attached: file.png (800x800, 196K)

YOU EAT DOGS IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY

Cha bum-kun, of course.

park was actually a good player and won several leagues and the champions league. son can barely stay consistent for 3 games in a row and hasn't won jack shit with tottenham.

Son and it's not even close .
Why is this even a debate

Revisionism is a hell of drug . Park was just a body who kept chasing people. Just a Alex Ferguson masterclass to rein in the Asian market (this is just a theory)
Also attackers>>>>midfielders

why does the fact that hes won trophies make him a better player?

Are the Korean flags on Yea Forums all english teacher gaijin?

get back to shitting on the streets you clueless pajeet

opinions like this make you remember why there are literally 0 pajeet football players at serious level

Attached: 1554411750069.jpg (643x820, 80K)