Have the roles reversed?

>those sikhs were born in manchester
you've had pakis for a whole century there?

why are Indians so damn fat?
i went to a public swimming pool with my sikh friend in a heavily indian neighbourhood, and ALL of the brown people still had pot bellies despite many of them having big muscles.
Is it all of the rice and chickpeas?

Old Trafford is still full of plastics from the Ferguson era but to be fair, United's away support is matched by absolutely no one, not even Leeds. They bring a loud mob wherever they go.

If City are the new United, then United are like Leeds under O'Leary, a young team with a young manager aiming to finally win the league once again after years of mediocrity since they last did, having fun in Europe while their rivals are dominating English football.

ferry cross the.... irish sea

Every single club in the country thinks they have the best away fans. You have to be genuinely deluded if you think United's are the best.

This
Both supporter bases are very, very pathetic

I'm not a United fan.

Pretty much.

Well into his career, Gary Neville bragged about never even losing to City once. And it wasn't just #bantz: at the time, it was a realistic thing to think he could have a 20 year career without losing a Manchester Derby once.

youtube.com/watch?v=0ms_b_NH3P4

united are still sanctimonious lefty faggots with an army of bandwagoning mudpeople, while citeh are normal white mancs. i'm a neutral as an ameican but the refball that man u got under fergie is enough to make anyone's blood boil

Probs closer to 75 years since everyone came over after WWII but yeah, when you think about it.

Sikhs never bother anyone tbqh, why shouldn't they get to support ManU

You know they are probably from Manchester right?

love to be simultaneously plastic and mocked for not selling out an expanded stadium every game

Liverpool is more plastic than both.

>The first Sikh settler in Britain was Maharaja Duleep Singh (1838-1893), the last Sikh Emperor of the Imperial Sukerchakia Dynasty, from 1844-1849. He arrived in England in the year 1854, having been exiled from his Kingdom by the British. His mother, Empress Jind Kaur (1817-1863), arrived in 1860 at Kensington in Victorian London and settled permanently, after fighting the British for a long time until the fall of the Sikh Dynasty in 1849. She was given permission by the British Parliament to settle on English soil. A jewel on the UK queen's crown belonged to, and was stolen from Maharaja Ranjeet Singh.

>The First Sikh Settlers started migrating from the Punjab in 1911, when the first Sikh Gurdwara was opened in London. During the start of the First and Second World Wars respectively, there was already an established Sikh presence in many parts of England. In London itself the community was small but this grew very rapidly during the 1950s and 60s and faced much racism and discrimination, mainly owed to the appearance and skin colour.

We have had them since the 50’s really. Though most pakis actually came here in the early 2000’s.

Unlike the peasant Italian/Polish immigrants that currently live in Argentina, the Sikhs are not smug annoying cunts

>Have the roles reversed?

No. City have caught up with United.

Indian food is too tasty, but not always healthy. Mainly it's just the lifestyle

Actual indian food is healthy

I know but i don't want hipsters to get wind of that and raise up the prices of the ingredients

>While United are now the real Manchester club, with loyal fans who have stood by their team despite not having much to shout about

Yeah, must be so hard for them

Attached: phil.jpg (319x450, 31K)

...

>Unlike the peasant Italian/Polish immigrants that currently live in Argentina, the Sikhs are not smug annoying cunts
i attribute argentinians' shit personality to the spaniards
our italians and poles are very nice people

Utd arent young

ATLETICO GIRONA MASHA BABKO

youtu.be/FCOUx04bKmw

Attached: 001.jpg (1047x618, 208K)

to me, both are shit but City is way more based that cringe united. It's a team of past glories nowadays

English stadiums are cathedrals. Even Q$G fans put Manure and Liverpoop "legendary" "athmosphere" to shame.

>City are the real Manchester club

Said no one who has ever been to Manchester.

Although places like Rochdale, Salford and Bury etc. are full of United fans, the people who actually live in the actual city of Manchester are mostly City fans.

THAT'S WHY THEY'RE CALLED MANCHESTER CITY!

Walking round Manchester I see way more houses with Man City stuff than United

Nope. I'm from Manchester. 60/40 United, at the very least. That's just the City Of Manchester itself and not counting Salford and Trafford which are like 90% United. There are surveys that prove this.

In East Manchester and parts of South Manchester, that's probably the case as those areas are full of City fans. Everywhere else is United dominated.

Also if you're going to draw conclusions about a team's support based on what you personally see in house windows, then you must not support any team if you don't have similar stuff on display.

Plus local United fans make a big deal about not being shirters and think that kind of thing is "small time", go to a United away game and you rarely ever see a replica shirt or scarf among the away support, whereas City fans are the biggest shirters around.

that's just what the average person here looks like

speak for yourself razeesh
and fuck united citeh all day every day

Attached: 84F3EE3B-7CDB-4C49-BBBC-4DA0764DA661.jpg (2576x1932, 554K)

Yes all the fans city have now stuck with them for 2 relegations, that logic is flawless

This is the post

slowly walkin down the hall
fasta thannnnn a cannonball
Where were you while we were getting high?

Yes you are

In my experience it’s 50/50

Attached: india.jpg (800x623, 203K)

I always wonder who finds post like that funny

t. Leeds fan

Case in Point, OP.

Children and man-children mostly

The nigger reply and 14 yo comeback

Nope. Everton.

Half their fanbase weren't there when they were in the third tier (for one single season)

Also the "muh best fanbase because they were relegated 20 years ago!" argument doesn't wash, because they never sell their ground out when it's not derby day.

Those guys are at every game in the same seat. Probably been living in Manchester for ages now

No

>despite not having much to shout about.
They have still won trophies since Fergie left, played in the CL, finished second last season, etc. Hardly fucking FC United of Manchester tier are they.

Im confused by this post and afraid to click on the link.

>"b-but m-muh europa league!"

This desu

Still more than livershit

all private clubs owned by billionaires or corporations are plastic by definition