The great debate

The great debate

Attached: Alonso Busquets.jpg (644x362, 35K)

biscuits more suited to a specialised role, alonso better overall

no debate, at all

Which one?

How is this a debate? The guy on the left is clearly more attractive.

The chad xabi Alonso vs the virgin Sergio Beusquets

Everyone will say Alonso but it's clearly Busquets, it doesn't matter how much you dislike him, it is what it is

>long diagonal ball babby vs the cold calculating complete midfielder that can actually play both on and off the ball, defend and dictate the play

Long pin point accurate diagonal balls are one of the most difficult skills in the game, you utter retard.

The only thing xabi did better was hollywood passes. Sergio covered more ground

>The only thing xabi did better was hollywood passes.
His tackle/interception numbers were always better, as were his average pass numbers, always as key passes and goal involvements

No one cares about stats

Despite being a barcafag I prefer Xabi Alonso. Busquets' biggest asset is his tactical fouling and game reading, both of which Xabi didn't lag too far behind on, and he could still play as CMF while Busquets is too slow to play box to box all the time. That other fag got it right, Busi is simply too specialized and would most likely be a benchwarmer in other teams since most coaches wouldn't understand how to best use him.

Alri' la Chabby m8, it's Stevie g here

Busquets is a meme

Busquets is the best 5 of all time, prove me wrong

more like the great and the debateable

I think this is accurate.

Xabi Alonso because Spiritualized

Alonso of course

Attached: JS44390018.jpg (615x409, 47K)

definitely biscuits because I can't see the game without him

Alonso

Underrated