Based

Why is one of those different? Did he draw it on himself?

olympic games before 1930. they were considered as world cups back then. however, by that same logic Gaet FC should be considered a world cup winner

By that logic England should have 10+ stars for the international matches against Scotland in the 1870s

One is legitimate.

I honestly see this shit on par with real madrid's mickey mouse european cups

I'd imagine most English fans would turn that down just to prevent Scotland from having any stars.

The US team should have 7 stars on their crest then if this is allowed.

And 100 World Series stars

1 star wanted level for biting?

it´s not that they are "considered" as world cups, those two tournments were organized by FIFA in the frame of the olympic games

That's FIFA's fault for allowing it, not Uruguay's

1950, uma delicia

DECIME QUE SIENTE

they were considered world championships, not world cups, the stars are for the fifa world cup winners

Attached: 1464266757659.jpg (657x527, 40K)

There are no rules regulating the design of association logos. You can add a star for every Euro championship if you want.

Attached: logos according to uruguay.png (725x866, 524K)

>they were considered world championships

FIFA considers 1924 and 1928 the same as any other Olympic championship

Source: their official website

Attached: n-not organized by fifa btfo.png (1024x866, 81K)

and redpilled

Attached: 1491517381513.jpg (578x1401, 869K)

>England
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Based 4 times world champions country dude

You imagined correctly

>it´s not that they are "considered" as world cups
Spot on. They are not considered world cups

I like it. But we need to see those 4 stars in the next WC Panini album in order to officialize Uruguay as a four-time champion.

except they are that's why we have 4 stars in our crest and you only have 1 :^)

They have the papers. Apologize.
>englel still has one
my fucking sides

Attached: recognized by FIFA™.jpg (1074x1068, 215K)

They should count but Uruguay are retards for boycotting all those years when they could've won more, having the best team

I believe in 4 stars

Um. Sweety. There is the GB Football team there with three.

We have four, technically. GB team got three and England got one. So if England can claim the GB ones...

Wtf i love uruguay now

>France too busy going to the world cup instead of preparing their military for Germany
No wonder they got rekt.

sorry sweeties, only count the ones organized by FIFA while there was no WC

Uruguay: 4 Stars
your countries: starlets seething

Rude

That PDF doesn't exist in the FIFA website as of 2019

they deleted it? lmao

>they'll never know how it feels to have 4 stars

lmaoing at ur lives hahaha

OH NONONONONO, LITERALLY FANFICTION

Attached: deleted forever.png (1144x541, 63K)

>b-but we have the papers!!!
literally superiority complex from a nation that has got nothing

papers 404'd

>this saltmine of a thread
Starlets, when will they learn

I'd turn it down because it would be bullshit. I think any world cup before 1990 is bullshit

Behold!

Attached: puma-egypt.jpg (1600x900, 171K)

Okay, what are the stars for?
Garbage tier opinion t b h

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa_Cup_of_Nations#Results

The Soviet logo is based as fuck. The Canadian one is disgusting.

If any Scottish or Welsh players were on the team, England can't claim it.

One star for everytime we BTFO'd them

cringe and bluepilled

TEN STARS ON THE SHIRT
JEWELS REMAIN STILL GLEAMING
ALL THEM YEARS OF WINNING
NEVER STOPPED ME GRINNING

Attached: fotonoticia_20140717173055_420.jpg (420x484, 55K)

wouldn't spain have 3 stars?

>english
>blood on the shirt

recurring theme

Don't know what you're trying to get at paddy but kindly accept this greentext.
>Irish potato famine

Attached: 1393830153173.gif (245x118, 403K)

>There are no rules regulating the design of association logos.

Yes there are, you can't use stars that you don't have or FIFA will punish you, there's a simple fact and it's that FIFA doesn't disagree with us using it in every world cup or any other tournament for that matter.

Attached: uruguay-2018-world-cup-puma-home-kit-a3.jpg (232x311, 37K)

>2 stars

Man no wonder they're seething all the time, poor guys

Attached: -05fF71Y_400x400.jpg (400x400, 31K)

Then we'd have 19 stars because of our 15 Copa Americas? soon to be 20.

Who dislikes Uruguay?
>Brazil loves them because they're not Argentina
>Argentina loves them because they're not Brazil
>England loves them because they're not Argentina and they play 4 4 fookin 2
>Griezzmann slurps their semen
>Godin is a proper defender, does his job quietly, top 5 CB
>Jimenez possibly the best young CB in the world
>Suarez - ugly as fuck, scores goals
>Cavani - handsome as fuck, scores goals
>Always work hard and overachieve
They're basically the anime team of international football

jej

based and EXTREMELY redpilled post

Starlets.

Absolutely based.

Yeah if you put it like that it sounds even more pathetic, there are no two ways about it.

they were hated for decades for being the dirtiest bunch of cunts in world football

Exactly, they are based

SEETHING starlets unable to COPE

FINALLY HEXA!