Euros act like if you don't play in their league you're nothing

>Euros act like if you don't play in their league you're nothing
>you play in their league
>They say it isn't enough
>someone come along and play from the beginning their whole career
>they start claiming that person as their own
>meanwhile after draining your league they say that your league is shit
>they act like the whole history of football was the current situation
>if good players decide to change that and play in their own league, they'll be forgotten and laughed at

Am I the only one who notices this trap?

Attached: messi.jpg (480x270, 19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling
youtube.com/watch?v=Jbhq4Q5cJNI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

the "trap" in getting paid more?

>listening to north middle easterners

shiggy

We have same mentality in leagues outside of SA and Europe, even in China and Arab countries they have good players, you know.

Riquelme, an player with an average career in Europe, is treated like a god in Argentina because he played in their league during his prime.

a horse that good doesnt jumping haver that it have to be

he was a genius tbf

I agree

>Europe is the only relevant footballing nation
Shocker.

>South Amerinferiors

Soccer? More like Shitter. Delete this thread and come back never.

>nation
retard

Europe got money from oil sheikhs and globalized the whole game by buying the best from everywhere. They now act like this was the situation from the beginning of football. They will argue with a straight face that English plumbers made a better league than Brazilian in the 60s because England is in Europe. Today more than 67% of the premier league is foreigners

Attached: a.jpg (1280x720, 43K)

Europe is tacticalmy leagues above SA. This is why we have the best trainers, this is why your players come there, this is why your NTs only perform with players from Europe, this is why we win.

Europe contributed to everything of relevance in your country. Why cant you accept it?

>Muh tactics
The reason our players there is because of the fucking giant money from Saudi sheikhs and you know it. Oil money

>your NTs only perform with players from Europe
Only recently. Pic related is our 1994 WC squad

Attached: a.jpg (1450x545, 310K)

it is now, it wasnt back than, btw you are not european, muhammad

Players should be banned from playing in leagues that aren't from their own country.

>implying things will get better with this backwards populist swine

Attached: 5416154541515.jpg (1200x675, 55K)

yes, let me play in my domestic league full of stunted career shitters who never made it just looking to fuck me up for making it
yes, let me earn less money
yes, let me stagnate by not playing with and against the best players in the world on a regular basis
yes, i will pretend all leagues are equal, both financially and the quality of the football

fucking jungle monkeys, i swear.

learn how the world works

>1994

>recently
that was 25 years ago
a quarter of a century

Which populist swine? I don't see a picture of Lula or any left-winger there.

to add to this:
yes, let me live in a country where i am less safe, my family is less safe, where my children will receive a poorer education (like yours)
yes, let me have a lower quality of life in every aspect

We're talking about history.

You know world cups only happen each 4 years, right?

so, six world cups have elapsed then? not including '94
a quarter centuries worth, damn
long time

Post the Brazil team from 2018 and their clubs

Actually, even the 2002 one had a lot of players from here

Attached: 2002.jpg (1444x696, 438K)

Mainland autists like to think it is.

God, learn to read what we're discussing about, you fucking NZ brainlet.

>Kaka
>Ceni
>Luizao
>Eilson
>Paulista
>Vampeta
>Kleberson
>Polga
>Belletti
>Dida
>Giberto Silva
>Ricardinho
>Marcos
How many of those were actually relevant? The best players on that team are Carlos, Ronaldino, Rivaldo and Ronaldo, none of whom played in Brazil

get good

>The reason our players there is because of the fucking giant money from Saudi sheikhs and you know it. Oil money
No, the reason is because we are rich.

>the biggest European clubs always buy the best of the best from South America
>South American clubs never get the best European prospects unless on some sort of loan deal
>Someone sudacas think that they're leagues can stand up to Europe

>Euros say
>Euros claim
>Euros act
Don't you see? You're the problem. You're placing all of the emphasis on the European perspective yourself. Do you think anyone in Europe cares what Brazilians think about their league or their players? As long as you place all this weight on what Europeans think and what Europeans say you'll always remain a footballing colony. You need to create value in your own league, in your own domestic game to rise up. Complaining about the big bad Euros does nothing but confirm your status as a colony, a victim.

>Europe
>Nation
Cuckold to big German cock

>we

Owner of man city:
Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan

Owner of liverpool:
Fenway Sports Group (american)

Owner of man u:
Glazer (american)

Owner of arsenal:
Alisher Usmanov (russian)

Owner of chelsea:
Abramovich (russian)

Owner of Wolves:
Fosun International (china)

We mostly watch our league not euro leagues. But the power of money extract the good players.

Cringepost. The Premier League is a 'global brand partnership', the Championship is the top tier of English football.

this is quite a lot more substantial an answer than i had expected to find
you are absolutely correct and it does not apply only to BRs

>The Campeonato Brasileiro is the most-watched football league in the Americas and one of the world's most exposed, broadcast in 155 nations. It is also one of the world's richest championships, ranked as the sixth most valuable with a worth of over US$1.43 billion, generating an annual turnover of over US$1.17 billion in 2012.

your mothers cunt turned over that measly an mount last week alone, next.

tip: when they list the billions to 2 decimal places, they reeeeeeeeeally want to emphasize the amount

So what? A lot of those guys weren't in at the beginning, a lot of those guys don't pump money in to their clubs and a lot of those came because PL was so lucrative in the first place.

I'm talking about the world stage. Conversations about the best and stuff like that

The money (not only euro money) is in Europe and so the rest of the world is looking there.

If the money goes to the US then you guys become irrelevant and we start to look for Americans

Well done. Now work out how to retain your best talent rather than acting as a feeder league for all of Europe.

>retain your best talent
Impossible. The money is in Europe. Money from China, Russia, even the US, middle east is there. You can't be serious to suggest something like that..
Look at the Neymar purchase
Who owns PSG?
>Qatar Sports Investments

Allow unlimited imports of foreign players and allow foreign capital access to your clubs?

European leagues were the best far before any Middle Eastern money started coming in. Why do you think they all invested in European clubs?

>Why do you think they all invested in European clubs?
Because Europe has a good economy

GDP
>$19.1 trillion (nominal; 2019) $23.0 trillion (PPP; 2019)

Exactly so Europe would be better than SA even without foreign investment

No, back in the day the game wasn't globalized like today.

This was liverpool in the 80s. Almost all brits

Attached: liverpool.jpg (1224x699, 299K)

>Allow unlimited imports of foreign players
kills local talent, you should know something about it

That's due to changes in labour laws more than anything

This is liverpool today.

Attached: liverpool.jpg (857x430, 261K)

If you are aiming for Pele, nobody is saying that he is shit because he didn't play in Europe, he is shit(as in not goat), because he played against farmers, and he played against farmers not because he didn't play in europe but because football back then wasn't what it is today.

The last four World Cups have been won by European teams, why wasn't their local talent killed?

Their league aren't as extreme as yours though
Your league: 67% foreigners

but wait, those guys aren't "local talent" most of the guys in the french squad are in non-french leagues taking the place of the "local talent" of that country

Countries like germany, spain, italy have less foreigners than England in their leagues.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling

Their leagues are a lot more extreme than yours though. France and Spain have over 40% foreigners, you're at less than 10%.

Even in 94, 8-9 starters were playing in europe, you just filled out the bench with brazilian league players. Scolari did something similar in 02, because it's politically beneficial. Arab money is irrelevant, european clubs were the richest before it came in and would be if they left. It just woudnt be man city and psg

Basado

>listening to north Mexicans
shiggy dig

>average career
youtube.com/watch?v=Jbhq4Q5cJNI

He was unironically great

>listening to western swedes
ISHYGDDT

Kaka, the winner of a balon d'Or wasn't relevant?

Am I the only one who notices that soccermutts flooding a generalized board with one topic is much like how a subreddit operates?