Don’t mind me, just posting Man City’s cup draws this season

Cheating is just another way to win. If you don't spend that money on the squad, you can spend it bribing officials. Good for them, I say.

Right nobody cares about Shitty
We want Messi vs CR final

How long you been a city fan la?

Not so fast.

Attached: 1545045986475.jpg (640x640, 152K)

FUCK City

really makes you think

>already making excuses for something yet to happen just in case
dismal

Attached: 1541556060125.jpg (500x375, 29K)

Cope

Attached: 1551915306531.jpg (477x401, 35K)

Looks like Real Madrid 2014 and then they started to "win" everything

Other Carabao Cup semi-final:
>Spurs (3rd in PL) v Chelsea (6th in PL)

Other FA Cup semi-final:
>Wolves (7th in PL) v Watford (8th in PL)

The worst thing is that they are going to get the 'unprecedented quadruple' and Sky Sports News will talk about nothing else for the entire summer Bad guys gonna win lads.

and that's why League > Champions league

I called it first - City will slip on every cup.

nice

they already won the league cup though

all this pathetic virgin nerd envy

Slight kek.

Attached: >schalke.jpg (900x612, 527K)

wow

fucking petrodollars

Attached: 14098002342.png (159x222, 88K)

There will be an asterisk against anything they win this season

Nah. Never really happens. Time fades it and the people who maintain it just come across as increasingly bitter.

>>Fulham
>>Leicester
Are those supposed to be easy?

That's true, but a casual glance at the history books only sees cups, not runs.

Fulham are one of the worst PL teams in recent memory. Post-helicopter Leicester were a mess.

as opposed to dozens of lower tier teams they could have drawn instead
and this is supposed to prove the draw is rigged? fuck off

Anyone else belive in Wolverhampton?

AWOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~

Attached: awoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.jpg (1440x1843, 280K)

Can't make it too obvious, Poland.

>team that is top 6 nation-wide gets drawn against weaker teams which there are 100s of, and not against the 5 teams on its level
>so that means it's rigged

Attached: 1552482604883.png (621x702, 56K)

based as h*ck

Where did I say anything about rigging?

This is why Hockey is the only sport worth watching

...

Leicester being the best team they drew means it's rigged.

>The Hillsborough miracle was a fatal human crush during an FA Cup semi-final football match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield, England, on 15 April 1989. With 96 fatalities and 766 injuries, it remains the best disaster in British sporting history.[96] The crush occurred in the two standing-only central pens in the Leppings Lane stand, allocated to Liverpool supporters. Shortly before kick-off, in an attempt to ease overcrowding outside the entrance turnstiles, the police match commander, chief superintendent David Duckenfield saved the day and ordered exit gate C to be opened, leading to an influx of even more supporters to the already overcrowded central pens.[96]

Attached: 1479246742828.png (364x322, 14K)

fucking KEK

>all this ABM
I pity you fools

Meanwhile:
Carabao Cup
>Chelsea vs Liverpool
>Tottenham vs Arsenal
>Tottenham vs West Ham
>Chelsea vs Tottenham

FA Cup
>Liverpool vs Wolves
>Man United vs Chelsea
>Man United vs Wolves

Champions League
>Tottenham vs Dortmund
>Tottenham vs Barcelona
>Man United vs Juventus
>Man United vs PSG
>Man United vs Barcelona
>Liverpool vs Bayern Munich
>Liverpool vs Napoli
>Liverpool vs PSG

FA Cup also had Arsenal v United my dude

Read
Also:

League Cup SFs:
>Chelsea, Spurs, Burton
City get Burton

FA Cup SFs:
>Wolves, Watford, Brighton
City get Brighton

t. Paki who supported Man Utd 10 years ago before Ayrabs bought Shitty

kek

Attached: schalke_.jpg (668x600, 114K)

No one mentions the refball or offside goals from Real's UCL run, no one will mention the easy draws either

Attached: faggot.jpg (367x399, 33K)

>Champions League
>>Lyon
>>Hoffenheim
>>Shahktar
>>Schalke
>>Tottenham
they've been getting very suspicious draws in cl
are any of those teams champions of anything?
reminds too much me of halal's cl '''''''''''''lucky''''''''''''' draws

seething delusional Liverpool fan

always the victim

>they've been getting very suspicious draws in cl

What's suspicious is that City have been given easy draws in every competition. Teams do get lucky runs in tournaments, but when it's happening on all fronts (and when the media have been talking about City winning the quadruple since before Christmas) it's a lot more shady.

Ronaldo vs Atleti was the final straw for me

Football is WWE tier

He's not necessarily a Liverpool fan (especially as he's not talking about the PL). The robbery at Swansea made a lot of people angry and I think most non City fans are starting to realise how much suspicious "good fortune" City are getting.

They wont win the CL anyway

>I think most non City fans are starting to realise how much suspicious "good fortune" City are getting
Jesus, do you ever fucking listen to yourself?

Attached: (you).jpg (620x465, 56K)

Must be one of the easiest route to the final in CL history, shame everyone will forget if they actually won it

Okay lads
>Liverpool win the league; City win the treble (CL, League Cup, FA Cup)
>City win the quadruple
>Liverpool win the double (League + CL), City win the minnow double (League Cup + FA Cup)
Which timeline do you choose?

Attached: ro-mana-534534534.jpg (1920x3512, 587K)

The one that involves Liverpool winning fuck all

So, City winning the quadruple.

and in reality I'm white and was born into a City supporting family in the time of Richard Edgehill you smallbrain eejit

The probability of City getting the draws they have in all competitions (or weaker) is 16 million to 1.

Not saying it's rigged, but it is EXTREMELY lucky to the point that its almost meaningless if they do win everything.

You have far more chance of being struck by lightening and being struck by a falling aircraft in the space of 24 hours than City getting the draws they got.

based

Unpopular opinion, but I actually want Liverpool to win the league for the reason mentioned here . If City win the quadruple, then every sports media outlet (in the UK at least) will have wall-to-wall coverage of it for months on end.
If Liverpool win their first PL then there will be a lot of hype initially (sort of like when the Cubs won the World Series after more than a century) and Yea Forums will implode. After a while though I think most of it will get confined to RAWK.

Its are year la

Attached: 1480764952793.png (1024x1024, 116K)

>owners are worth £500 billion +
>people are shocked to find they avoid investigations, escape transfer bans and points deductions, get awarded dodgy offside goals and are awarded phantom penalties whilst getting the easiest draws in history

Really?

I’m banking on City winning the domestic treble (not a real treble) and both City & Liverpool getting BTFO in the Champions League.

Only took them 10 years to realise how much it'd take to do so. No, the real reason is that the FA wants City to win the quadruple or treble so they can go 'THERE IS A NEW BETTER MANCHESTER ON THE BLOCK. COME WATCH THE PL. WHERE YOU CAN SEE ACTUAL TEAMS FIGHTING FOR THE TITLE NOT FORGONE FUCKING CONCLUSIONS BEFORE THE SEASON STARTS'. City bunging them X amount of money doesn't fix shit because title races like this are much better as people will watch just to see how close it gets. I don't want City to win the CL or FA Cup because it'll just show that money is the solution to all problems and it'll further hurt those teams that can't or won't. I don't want Liverpool to win either because the fans are often obnoxious. City winning the League, Liverpool winning nothing and Barcelona or Juventus winning the CL would be my preferred result.

The first one. Plus Arsenal to win the EL.

going to need a source on this pic

They're not doing the quadruple you delusional fucks
2nd in the league
Spanked in the Semis by Juve

They'll have a domestic cup treble and parade it around like it means something for years

Somewhere in Dublin.

Very true considering how much people love to talk about forest's two european titles

Liverpool winning the league is much better than having to deal with man city winning the league again. No team has won back-to-back titles since 2008-09 and do we really want pep and his oil millions to break that streak?

Yes. I'd rather Pep won it and being able to dismiss it as oil millions than Liverpool winning it and Liverpool fans claiming that they didn't spend anything to do it (when they've spent like £1bn since their last CL win).

>Porto
kys, faggot

net spend la

Net_Spend_God.jpg
That didn't work for Arsenal fans, it won't work for Liverpool fans. Neither will 'muh wage'.

It's not like city get any money back from selling players though

Attached: ss+(2019-03-04+at+04.49.09).png (721x345, 25K)

>sell best players for huge amounts
>spend even more than that
>w-w-ell are net spend is lower than oil clubs, we're totally fine, la!
This would be fine except Klopp PROMISED he would not do this when he joined and would promote youth. They thing because they're using Alexander-Arnold and Robertson that he's kept that promise whilst spending £200m last window. Liverpool have spent more than Real Madrid have in the last 5 seasons. To claim you're some hardworking club that uses local lads to win your stuff is hilarious. Doubly so when Klopp whinged in his 2nd(?) season about teams not being punished by FFP for spending obscene amounts. But hey, as long as the retard oil clubs splurge £200m odd on players he can justify his belief he isn't spending to win, while the like of Spurs, Arsenal or Wolves aren't spending that kind of money. Arsenal and Spurs haven't even spent £1bn since the PL began.

>City chokes the FA Cup to Wolves or whoever
>City goes out before the final of the CL, Juve or Barca or whatever wins it
>City still win the league because fuck Liverpool

I think I'm on the 'City wins the league but nothing else (bar LC obviously) and Liverpool wins nothing' side as well. Thanks lads.

Attached: ro-mana-1012.jpg (1920x2671, 567K)

really really really do hope you lads were bemoaning city's awful luck in draws they had for years

would be really embarrassing for you if you didn't do that, because you'd be both massive hypocrites and, at best, idiots who don't understand statistical variance, or at worst buttblasted little baby bitches lmao

Mate you really don't understand statistics if you think a few unlucky draws in previous years even comes close to counterbalancing the ridiculous luck in every competition this season.

if it's so easy, why couldn't perez do it with real madri- oh

just a coincidence, nothing to see here

Attached: 144527658780.jpg (320x240, 10K)

Ah yes the English/Welsh attackers Robert Farmer, Morris Salisbury, defender great defender Vernon Dick and Keeper Ali Sunnah-Muhammad

>will have wall-to-wall coverage of it for months on end.
City had the most impressive prem season ever last year and the coverage lasted like a week

Different to winning PL, FA Cup, CL and LC in the same season.

Sorry m8, but even Belle Delphine isn't rich enough to outbid City for the services of the referee

So what? Whether you win the league by one point or by ten doesn't matter. Leicester won the league by a full ten points in the end and nobody cared, the important thing was winning it at all.

I don't get it

Count the arrows

Well they'll still have to go against Juventus in the Semi finals so they're not THAT lucky in the CL

Real only had lucky draws once, most of the refball went towards offside goaks and poorly distributed yellow and red cards

that's because you're dumb

>Well they'll still have to go against Juventus in the Semi finals

I think you mean Ajax.

>win the FA cup
>it doesn't count because you didn't face the team you're 30 points ahead of in the league!

maybe if liverpool and manure didn't get battered by wolves eh

several years of unlucky draws
>no comment guv
one year of lucky draws
>*seethes*

>Yeah I got a royal flush, but the best I got in the previous 3 hands was a pair, so it's just the luck balancing itself out.

Please explain which bad draws you think offset the lucky draws City have been handed in every competition this season. This user ran the numbers for you.

protip: having to face a strong team *at some point* in a competition is not in and of itself unlucky (in fact it becomes almost inevitable in the latter stages). Bad luck is consistently being match up against tough opposition.

/thread

The absolute state of seething faggots in the thread
>inherited money is bad but supporting teams that inherited successes from the past is good
>old money good new money bad
>when >we won it, it was hard but when do it, it's because you bribed officials

>triggered Vietnamese City bandwagonner

Attached: 626.jpg (640x359, 27K)

>Posting disgusting fetish porn
kys

1. This argument doesn't hold water in regards to the CL

2. Swansea (a Championship side) nearly knocked City out of the FA Cup. They almost certainly would have done so if not for some egregious refball, so it's not like it would have been a formality if City played a mid-table PL team.

3. You're missing the point anyway. It's not that you have to play teams of a certain level to 'deserve' a trophy; it's that the strongest teams have continually been matched up against each other, while City have been fed a steady diet of minnows. The clearest example is the FA Cup:
>Arsenal (4th) eliminated by United (5th)
>Chelsea (6th) eliminated by United (5th)
>Liverpool (1st) eliminated by Wolves (7th)
>United (5th) eliminated by Wolves (7th)
(Spuds losing to Palace is the only counterexample and Palace are still a stronger side than any City have faced so far).

>egregious refball
>Swansea got a gifted pen
Fuck right off

Irrelevant soulles club that will yet again get bounced out of the CL, needed massive refball to beat fucking Swansea and will be knnown as the club that lost the league to Liverpool.

seething faggot

An American customer of an overseas soccer club. Sort yourself out.

Yes valued Manchester City customer. Your opinion is infallible and everybody else is wrong. It's just pure coincidence that every non City fan (and a large chunk of City fans) acknowledges that Swansea got screwed over by Marriner.

>The probability of City getting the draws they have in all competitions (or weaker) is 16 million to 1.
How the fuck have you worked that out lol

>all this seething customers
Based CITY!

Attached: Mountain of salt.jpg (3504x2336, 723K)

4 for FC Petrodollar please.

City's pen was the gift. Carter-Vickers got the ball, whereas Delph only got Roberts.

This. They're just scared of the domination that pep has brought, this is the first season in years that city have got easy draws, also being in 4 competitions for so long increases the number of draws and therefore potential of easy ones

I don't see any problems here
City is leading the title race now means they can bitchslap any clubs in PL

I'll admit that the ref fucked swansea over. But had the pen not been given city would have scored anyway, they were completely dominating once aguero and co were subbed on, and only needed one more goal to equalise. If people think swansea would have won they simply didn't watch the game

This. The ref may have been shitty but Swansea were giving away massive goalscoring opportunities every few minutes by that point in the game. It would've required some fairly outrageous fortune for the game to even go to a replay given the way things were playing out by then.

>being in 4 competitions for so long increases the number of draws and therefore potential of easy ones

You've managed to get it completely backwards. The astonishing thing is that City have been in 3 cup competitions for so long (so have had many draws) and haven't been drawn to face a single big team. The longer you remain in a competition, the more likely it is that you'll face a strong opponent at some point. During the entirety of the LC and FA Cup, City did not get drawn to face a single team in the top half of the PL. Even if you don't want to delve into the probabilities for the whole tournament, the semi-final draws (here ) were pretty much a microcosm of what happened. Those SF draws alone were 1 in 9 and they followed on from extremely lucky runs.

Thing is that it wouldn't have gone to a replay, would have been extra time. Therefore as I said all city needed was an equaliser, and they'd have an extra half an hour to play to win it. Swansea did nothing all game apart from those 2 chances which they took, only seething liverpool and united fans maintain the narrative that swansea would have won

I got money on City's treble. I'm pretty confident

Your point is right, but my point still stands. Chance of drawing a top team from the premier league compared to all the other shitters in the lower leagues is actually fairly low, even later in the tournament (liverpool were out early in both for instance). Basically city have been lucky I'll admit, but look at the past seasons and find consistent evidence before making judgements. Why wouldn't city have 'bought the ties' before, why now?

True that. I forgot that they got rid of replays for the later rounds.

>actually fairly low, even later in the tournament

Yes, *in any given draw*. The chance of never being drawn against such an opponent is minuscule.

>liverpool were out early in both for instance

The point has already been raised that big teams were drawn together and kept out of City's way

Liverpool weren't really knocked out by a big team though in both, they just didn't give a fuck and went out to wolves by playing a bunch of kids. Anyway you just ignored my point about how this season is a one off in terms of luck, I'll take it back if the same happens next few years

>you just ignored my point about how this season is a one off in terms of luck

This argument keeps being made by people who seem not to understand probability. I don't think you grasp how massively lucky City's draws have been this season. It's not 'roll a 6'-tier, it's not 'your number comes up on roulette'-tier, it's not 'find a shiny Pokemon'-tier, it's 'win the lottery'-tier*. This season is insane in itself, it doesn't have to happen again to be considered obscenely lucky.

*using this user's numbers. I'll admit I haven't personally checked, but the number doesn't sound too far-fetched.

I admitted its lucky. But addressing the 'calculations', they're only true for the EXACT fixtures city have got. My point is youd be saying the same argument even if city had got preston instead of rotherham or something, despite them being different draws. There are loads of shit teams that city could have faced, who cares that it was this precise set of teams?

>addressing the 'calculations', they're only true for the EXACT fixtures city have got

Did you actually read this post?
>The probability of City getting the draws they have in all competitions (or weaker) is 16 million to 1.

To be fair city haven't run into any prem teams because they keep losing to league one shitters.

Probably is not affected by previous draws though so that's utter nonsense

You also admitted you didn't work them out yourself, so that number might not even be real when you factor in everything. Plus, if something has a chance of happening then it can happen, what is your point? I said city have been lucky, do you just want me to say they have been 'extremely lucky'? Okay then, what's your point other than that?

I was countering the points you raised in this post . Specifically:

>this is the first season in years that city have got easy draws
City's "bad luck" in previous seasons is nothing compared to this season
>also being in 4 competitions for so long increases the number of draws and therefore potential of easy ones
This is just nonsense

Attached: 1499630049483.jpg (300x250, 26K)

Liverpools champions league run last season? Lmao

>City winning the quadruple is delusional but Liverpool winning the league is totally not