Why are English, Italian and German strikers so shit?

Why are English, Italian and German strikers so shit?

Attached: Stats.png (729x618, 54K)

is that Messi on top?

they don't play in farmers leagues

I thought Messi was bad

Why would you think that dumbass?

Whoscored thought Otamendi was the best cb in europe last season

Yeah, and total goals scored is another subjective whoscored metric

Man City system makes CB stats look good
See Laporte

goals without weighting for minutes is useless

The minutes played are right there. Also, Tompkins, Mustafi, Vertonghen, Tarkowski, Azpi, Duffy were all rated higher than Otamendi

*scores*

Attached: zapata.jpg (1596x772, 141K)

Quagliarella is Italian and is 3rd what are you talking about?
Also where's Piatek? He's at 19 too with less minutes and penalties than CR7

>see flag
>see op
what the fuck? is this some elaborate scheme to rip on messi?

Attached: Arino.png (382x346, 142K)

>Sampdoria striker is the 3rd
where's he playing next year?

Germans are absolute trash, only Gerd Müller was elite, Klose was good and that's it.

But English and Italians had and have lots of good strikers. Italy more false nine/trequartistas tbf but still some good true 9s like di Natale, Luca Toni, Inzaghi, Vieri, etc

>36
MLS

Italians have a defensive way of playing

he's like 100 years old

Probably not there because he switched teams

They play against better defenders

what a dumb site, and people take theyr ratings seriously

Attached: nothin personel.webm (800x450, 1.11M)