/hoc/

>tonight
OTT @ NYI, 7 pm
CAR (HFD) @ BOS
CBJ @ NJ
FLA @ PIT
WPG @ TBL, 7:30
MIN @ NSH, 8 pm (7 pm Central)
NYR @ DAL, 8:30 (7:30 Central)
DET @ COL, 9 pm (7 pm Mountain)
ANA @ ARZ
MTL @ LAK, 10:30 (7:30 Pacific)

Attached: wooooooooo.jpg (2048x1365, 401K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TJtiepwpKFw
youtube.com/watch?v=Hm_oSgUlQ3A
hookedonphonics.com/
youtube.com/watch?v=fAE6aZRzTIc&
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

go knights

*rapes you*
Enjoy your aids you sunbelt pussies hope you learn about hockey before you die of aids

Attached: IMG_0944.jpg (400x400, 38K)

ice

So is Bulju generational?

this man crushes your star player at the club
wyd???

Attached: Tie_Domi.jpg (272x345, 12K)

BUF @ PHI, 7 pm
SJS @ BOS
CGY @ NYI
OTT @ WSH
PIT @ CBJ
LAK @ CAR
MTL @ DET, 7:30
MIN @ WPG, 8 pm (7 pm Central)
NSH @ STL
FLA @ ARZ, 9 pm (7 pm Mountain)
DAL @ VGK, 10 pm (7 pm Pacific)

This schedule is incorrect.

Give him aids and call him a sunbelt pussy that doesn't know anything about hockey while raping him

Attached: IMG_1035.png (450x300, 56K)

where’s the /hoc/ discord

Attached: 1542000581812.jpg (464x618, 40K)

check your inbox ;)

THG discord is basically /hoc/ discord, you should check it :P

Attached: shannon(1).jpg (500x500, 75K)

>the central is good

Attached: 859F111C-2FC1-4EDE-BB18-83A60448E813.png (550x789, 114K)

what do you mean?
looks legit legitimate to me.

this shows that the central is the most competitive division

yeah, i have no idea what he's talking about. i've been looking forward to knights/stars for days

Actually it shows the metro division is the most competitive 6 teams with 90+ points

>teds
You see, they will make the playoffs and will go to scf

Attached: 1509648835197.png (407x681, 385K)

Why do you keep trying to push this increasingly-unlikely narrative, Latvia? Explain it to me.

Actually that means the metro is the faggit division

Based

he's a retarded sharks fan, what do you expect

That's what happened in my dream, so it must be true

Very rude

Attached: 1476331114390.png (226x213, 58K)

if that is true then why does the metro have a bottom feeder in it forecasted to hit below 75 points?
not to mention the atlantic division that has two free win teams

seems more like the metro is obscuring the fact they create 3 points every game

oh fug my hip

Attached: 1506940390731.jpg (826x548, 50K)

can we get a Cliff Pu development update

More teams in the playoff race
That makes it more competitive

but the central has 7 teams in the race
so by your own logic its more competitive

fug ye ima not trade

Attached: 1545721221812.webm (660x524, 785K)

Rent fucking free

>even acknowledging them

Hope the sunburn doesn't aggravate the aids you got from being raped you sunbelt pussies that don't know shit about hockey


ole!

Attached: borat.jpg (2048x1536, 246K)

This post is extremely low quality.

you don't know anything about hockey. Stick to aids and not being able to avoid rape.

How to spot sunbelt hockey fans
>don't know hockey
>aids
>short
>never played hockey
>opinions on hockey based on rollerblading
>can't rollerblade away from rapists
>think everything is a penalty

also they have poor judgement on ice quality

least coasters fucking worked this morning

You don't need ice to rollerblade

Focus on trying to learn about hockey and your doctor visits for your aids

truth, but this is an ice hockey discussion thread

Which is why sunbelt hockey fans have so much trouble

focus on hockey discussion instead of fawning over my cock

you don't know anything about hockey tho

the maple leafs are canadas team

quit projecting ted

all >your teams are aids and raped and >my team is healthy and chad

oh and you're definitely aids and raped if you're
>laffs

>blots

the maple leafs will have 14 cups after this season. how many does your team have?

>kippers going to get xir copy of NHL 19

Attached: 1527721966117.webm (1280x720, 1.92M)

Sharks

Attached: 1524979180362.gif (540x304, 2.72M)

That's cool and all, but how many regular season banners will they have?

is that an ogre

>"would you mind explaining this 52 year gap in stanley cup final history?"

Attached: 2019030510174.jpg (1079x719, 436K)

kek

>implying we're not already tanned

Attached: 36705268_1_x.jpg (375x400, 83K)

Mornin /hoc/ what are we mad at today?

Attached: sketch-1551799902455.png (720x720, 174K)

the league expanded and the talent was spread out more. now each team has a few good players and the rest are garbage. also you can barely touch someone. in the old days all of the teams were stacked and it was much more physical. it was truly a mans sport and championships meant something. now its a joke. id argue that the cups back then are worth 3+ cups these days.

Tripfags

So just a normal day then

what are the little numbers next to the teams

penis size in mm

still hungover from saturday

go leafs go

*siiiiiiiips*
Ahhh, damn good cup of coffee

all you need now is a joint

Your brackets are fucking retarded

got my pen lad but i do agree

trying to pull a 28-32 hour day to fix my sleep schedule lads

Don't do drugs

Need to bring kitty to the vet lads don’t post til I get back

get bent

good luck to you and the kitty

/hoc/ is not for weed-using degenerates.

Standing points so basically

Thanks she’s going to be 15 this summer every vet trip makes me nervous

alcohol and coffee are drugs

Attached: sonicshutup.jpg (714x241, 63K)

I agree, don't do those either.

post your tears on facebook

GL to kitty

Attached: 1477369709437.jpg (473x720, 45K)

>15
You should still have another 3 to 5 years with her, at least.

Don't do illegal drugs

>Year of Our Risen Lord MMXIX
>kikebook
She good girl never did nuffin

Um, sweaty, weed is legal most places now

facebook is the place for blogposting not /hoc/

Isn’t weed like legal as fuck in daneland

>weed

Attached: 1539552393021.jpg (371x396, 34K)

Nope, it's illegal
People just open sell and buy it in Christiania (that 'hippie' community in Copenhagen), the Police raid that place fairly often these days though

based and redpilled

what's for breakfast lads
just had 4 eggs, kefir and coffee

>xkcd
cringe and autismpilled

Cricket in 4 hours. Are you pulling for England or Windies?

i'm pulling for you to shut the fuck up

Windies because they have fewer Muslims.

>avoiding experiences because you believe your vanilla life is fulfilling

flapjacks, coffee and a fat joint. in that order.

>not willingly smoking weed or have a spiritual trip with psilocybin or lsd
The only reason these drugs are illegal is because the government can’t make money off of psychedelics (weed is becoming legal)

Dropped 3 tabs today and I’m in class
Holy shit

what is preventing the government from allowing taxable distribution systems for psychedelics

the government prefers opioids, weed is for fags anyways

What would prevent the government from profiting from drugs like lsd?
If they control the market, they essentially control the profits? like some places are starting to do with weed?

Nothing, they just won’t make money because psychedelics aren’t very commonly used among an average person

>dude man live life moke wed

Attached: am-then-told-that-cuc-make-america-great-again-but-20961234.png (500x899, 233K)

no you didn't

and alcohol companies are terrified because weed is easy as fuck to cultivate. an average person growing 4 plants consistently will never run out of weed and likely have to give alot of it away.

>psychedelics aren’t very commonly used among an average person
likely due to the massive restrictions on access

I can to some degree understand why people smoke weed
But I do strongly believe that there's a reason why heroin, crack, lsd, etc is illegal, besides the "government hates us!1!" or whatever nonsense gets spewn

It’s just as accessible as weed in illegal states

you can brew beer and wine at home easily enough, but liquor and beer sales continue to grow
the average consumer doesnt care that they can create these products for themselves

dont be afraid of new experiences user. life is about experiences.

Lsd and psilocybin do not cause physical harm directly to the user, not like heroin crack or meth

Don't treat LSD like weed, they're miles apart when it comes to their effects

every habitual dude weed I've met has been ugly, pudgy, dumb, shitty habits and perpetually broke

i invite you then to come and hang out with me, its time we smashed though prejudices of yours

>addicts trying to justify their addiction and push it on to others

Lol fucking loser

dont compare them to alcohol either. alcohol kills people daily while lsd/weed has never killed anyone.

blaaaazed, haha

Of course not, but as long as you know what you’re getting yourself into you will be fine

>prejudices
I've lived in a house with 3 of them junior year in college and lived with one in a dorm for a year. I think I have a pretty good sample size. I've also tried it several times and if you can consider weed a "life experience" then you're small souled.

I’m not dumb broke or have bad habits

This seems to be the arguement every stoner goes for, lol
Excessive and extreme usage of alcohol over a long time is indeed deadly, noone has denied that
People addicted to LSD/Weed has died due to their addictions, directly and indirectly, it's just a false statement made by addicts for addicts
You do you, but there's no reason to lie to yourself either

nice hockey discussion you fucking faggots

thats the typical individual who lets weed define them. the same way alcoholics let booze define them. if you live in extremes then of course you'll be off put by the behavior of those.

I could unironically see micro-dosing with psychedelics getting legalized and becoming a thing (similar to how dxm is in cough medicine, that shit will make you trip balls if you have enough). You don't hallucinate and it just increases attentiveness, alertness and creativity.

For what its worth I've taken lots of mushrooms and acid at various points in my past, and although it was generally awesome, I dont have much of a desire to do either again. But if it was legalized and readily available, I would probably microdose semi-regularly (at super low levels its basically just like coffee on steroids). The only problem is that LSD is so strong it would need to be prepared in an extremely controlled environment, the difference between heightened senses and tripping megaballs is like a grain of sand's worth, and there's no way I could reliably do it on my own (I've dabbled with LSD in liquid form, the difference between 5 licks-worth and 50 is like fucking nothing)

drugs are bad, okay?

Lsd and weed are non addictive substances, they are responsible for no deaths directly

>4 people is a good sample size when the human population is in the billions
yeah prejudiced is correct term

pass da dutchie pon de lef han side

This is why weed is a gateway drug. Hurry up and OD you waste of oxygen

Your favorite hockers most likely smoke weed. Don't be such a bitch.

Whoever told you that weed isn't addictive; slap him, cause he lied to you

he said, sipping his 7th cup of black psychoactive stimulant liquid

I never seen someone almost die and have their stomach pumped from smoking too much pot

>mY dArE iNsTrUcToR tOlD mE iTs A gAtEwAy DrUg
and that evening he went home and downed a six pack while watching football

>non addictive

Attached: 1542501789730.jpg (600x600, 72K)

yeah but one is gay the other is not

You understand that for something to be truly addictive it must have a chemical that causes the addiction
Marijuana isn’t addictive and the only addicts are people who have addictive personalities
A real chemical addiction is something that can cause withdrawl

No wonder they stopped inviting you to toke up

what kind of weak willed human being do you have to be to get addicted to marijuana?

what? I dont even do drugs anymore, and haven't for like 6 or 7 years. I guess I smoke weed occasionally, but definitely less than I did before it was legalized here.

Did you even read my post? Also are you really so ignorant/uninformed that you actually think someone can realistically overdose and die on weed, mushrooms or LSD?

Are smokers not addicted to smoking?

>The Markham Thunder will be battling les Canadiennes de Montréal in a best of three playoff series for a berth in the Clarkson Cup Final. This will be the third season in a row that the two teams will be meeting in the playoffs.

>The teams met six times during the regular season, with Montréal winning four contests to Markhams two. It was another gruelling year between these two teams who have cultivated quite the rivalry over the past few seasons. After two big losses when the teams met in the second weekend of this season, the Thunder bounced back with three of the four remaining games being one goal games – winning two of them in regulation.

>no rebuttal
>projection

Oof

Attached: catapillers for eyebrows.png (334x458, 204K)

cigarettes have chemicals in them that cause addiction

watch an alcoholic or heroic user go through detox. the physical dependence can kill them. weed does not do that. you can argue theres a mental dependence but if you took it away from a heavy user they'd be grumpy, not laying in a pile of their own vomit in tremendous physical pain.

Tobacco releases an addictive substance known as nicotine you fucking retard

Do you just light the dried up plant and smoke it? not mix anything in there?

Attached: n o.png (347x407, 303K)

>if you do it it's an addiction
Love this meme
I guess you're addicted to
Food
Walking
Breathing
Talking
Sitting
Standing
Water
Driving
Blinking
Etc etc

just like people aren't addicted to porn, video games, coffee, tv, alcohol, anything else that gives people pleasure
It doesn't have to have a specifically addictive chemical for someone to become reliant on it

I haven't smoked anything in a decade but still get the occasional craving for a cigarette. Nothing for weed tho.

Hilary Knight is on Montreal and Bozek on Markham

you can smoke dried tobacco, it will still contain nicotine which is addictive
cigarettes typically have a massive amount of additives

It’s not the weed that gets you addicted it’s what ever else you mix with the weed whether it be heroin crack or tobacco

>going to this extent to justify his addiction

Lol if you aren't dependent on weed then you wouldn't be going this far to defend it. Step one is amitting you have a problem

Canes will play in Whalers jerseys tonight?

>only SHIT teams playing tonight

Attached: 1525665302589.jpg (480x401, 77K)

There's best girl, and there's all the other bitches.

Attached: BESTGIRL.png (537x758, 349K)

>girl

Attached: 1516165880770.jpg (900x545, 67K)

see

how is this related to hockey? btw the leafs are canadas team.

You bet!
>youtube.com/watch?v=TJtiepwpKFw

Attached: been saving this hit for 21 years.webm (1280x720, 2.98M)

leafs are Canada's headache

anime is a gateway drug

Good games tonight. None tomorrow tho.

great point

can someone explain to me what capitalizing radom letters in a sentence is supposed to mean? I keep seeing it in youtube comments and twitter

tHiS iS aN eXaMpLe oF wHaT I mEaN

why do I keep seeing this? does it mean anything?

leafs dont play tonight so everyone may as well spend tonight with their families

Not really

Go ask Yea Forums.

Its an old mocking Spongebob meme format that he got from reddit.

Love the playoff push in the last 20 games

Rooting on CBJ and AZ tonight

Cool champ

Thanks chief

>Rooting on
>on
Gosh, English prepositions are hard.

it was a twitter meme dum dum

>reading comprehension skills too low to understand the point of my original post

I was saying that psylocibin or LSD In extremely small microdoses could have position health benefits that I could see being eventually legalized and implemented. I wasn't even talking about weed you fucking moron. You just did what a typical (actual) boomer would do, saw something about drugs and immediately went "hurr drugs are bad weed is a gateway drug you're going to OD" without even bothering to try and comprehend the point being presented.

Im sure you think alcohol is just fine though, even though the body count of that drug is orders of magnitude higher than every psychedelic combined (honestly probably every single illicit drug combined). And as I said in the first post, microdosing LSD is essentially no different than microdosing DXM when you have a cold. People just see "LSD" and immediately think of a manson hippie commune or something, when really in extremely small doses its not that different than a cup of coffee, and much safer than other drugs people take for similar reasons (ie, adderall, concerta, etc which are basically just legal meth)

hope both those teams lose desu

No, you don't understand. He doesn't like it. Therefore, it must be from reddit.

>Spongebob meme format
so when a sentence is written like that is it supposed to mean it's sarcastic?

youtube.com/watch?v=Hm_oSgUlQ3A

When I think of lsd I think of spiritual journeys and I think of Crosby stills and Nash

FUCK off you addict no one cares

I don't get it

I care. He's right you know.

>still can't comprehend the point of my post
hookedonphonics.com/

But I bet you think drugs (that are stronger and more addictive with a higher chance of overdosing) are ok as long as someone has a prescription, right?

Attached: 1542922577954.jpg (682x900, 68K)

yeah neither do i, must be a zoomer thing

TaLkInG LiKe ThIs HaS bEeN around since i was a kid on AIM and shit, and i'm 32. stupid fucking zoomers.

we should have the equilavant of a secret handshake over the internet so we can tell who is a /hoc/kiepede out wild

any ideas, bros?

zoomers dont realize that their entire culture is just stuff we've gotten tired of and thrown away

me for its l337 5p34k

Duuuuuuuudeeeeeeee weeeeeeeedddddddddd

Attached: 1525540683090.png (467x411, 191K)

is this a self portrait?

ftw!

we all carry a rag in our back pocket, because >rags

>weed totally isn't addictive and I'm totally not an addict you should smoke it too

Attached: the magazine for gamers.jpg (500x702, 72K)

yeah get back in line. the rat race needs you to be good worker bees.if you started to think for yourself the whole pyramid might collapse and those at the top would no longer be in control.

>this thread
youtube.com/watch?v=fAE6aZRzTIc&

It's funny because back in college it was kids who looked like this that didn't smoke, drink, or talk to girls. I guess times have changed.

no they haven't, that's still the case

Im not even talking about weed at all, and don't really care if anyone does or doesn't smoke it. Im talking about the potential health benefits of various psychedelic drugs in extremely small doses (so small you dont hallucinate) that we're depriving ourselves of because of our hypocritical laws. Do you think its just a coincidence that microdosing with LSD is becoming increasingly more common in silicon valley as an alternative to taking drugs like adderall or concerta?

Also for what its worth LSD has been shown to way more effective at treating alcoholism than AA or any other methods. In around 50% of test subjects the desire to drink was more or less eliminated after one dose, although I guess the science behind that is kind of debatable (sample size, variables, etc) and isn't really the point of what I'm saying.

Bright light city gonna set my soul
Gonna set my soul on fire
Got a whole lot of money that's ready to burn,
So get those stakes up higher

There's a thousand pretty women waitin' out there
And they're all livin' devil may care
And I'm just the devil with love to spare
Viva Las Vegas, viva Las Vegas

How I wish that there were more
Than the twenty-four hours in the day
'cause even if there were forty more
I wouldn't sleep a minute away

Oh, there's black jack and poker and the roulette wheel
A fortune won and lost on ev'ry deal
All you need's a strong heart and a nerve of steel
Viva Las Vegas, viva Las Vegas

Attached: FLEURYWOO.jpg (800x446, 276K)

but what does it mean dammit

>literally hippy level npc post

Lol

Attached: 1545684551828.jpg (479x604, 18K)

mocking

>mad
>at dudeweedlmao
It's current year 20xD6, talking shit about weed just makes you look like a boomer

I admit I got a little too flustered during that drug discussion, and I apoligize for that, some fair points were made desu
Back to hockey

>unironically underageb&

Attached: so.png (814x678, 330K)

nobody cares you fuckwit

Disagree. I imagine people who were never invited to parties growing up and are still resentful about it.

yes, it's usually something repeated in mocking tone, or in a retarded voice.

drugs are bad and stoners are losers. hockey is the only drug I need

Attached: hochug.jpg (558x907, 101K)

>most if not all nhl players drink or smoke
imagine watching degenerates play a sport in your free time

Time for the beta loser stoners to fuck off because big daddy is home

Attached: mariya has a hostile take over of hoc.jpg (700x385, 42K)

There were fewer teams, so it was easier to win. After expansion, the >laffs collapsed. They're still collapsed.

GFD win a game Blue Jackets. Fuck.

>drop out of middle school to focus on hockey full time
>isn’t even good at hockey
>bad hips at age 20
fucking lole

Attached: IMG_3812.gif (500x281, 1.79M)

don’t forget plays for the oilers JOJ

No one cares if you smoke weed and no one wants to hear about it you do.

>There were fewer teams, so it was easier to win.
if you have less teams that are more equal in talent is that truly easier than a league with more teams but less talent?

the finals are always going to be 1 vs 1 regardless of the number of teams

Fake news.

Nah he's right

>more equal in talent
toronto, detroit and montreal won almost all cups during the O6 era. so really, it was a three-team league. isn't that so exciting?

he will always have a job at the steel factory with his dad

Back from the vet lads

yet they infinitely contribute more to society than you bitching on a sudanese crochet archive about muh “degeneracy”

Attached: 1439834943389.jpg (4500x4334, 544K)

Go Caps

Was the vet tech cute?

How's the kitty?

Attached: cats blue (2011).png (270x270, 12K)

compared kittys health to a teams playoff chances

yes it is easier to win when you are competing with less people. get over it.

pittsburgh chicago and la have won nearly all the cups in the post 2012 CBA era
it despite the league having 31 teams its really just been a 3 team league
isn't that so exciting?

i don't care about drinking

Kinda, bit thicc
She’s lost some weight so I’ve got to get her bulking food
Solid lock like Tampa

this doesnt address anything i said

Yes it is

Yes, if there are fewer teams the probability that any one of them can win rises.

Expansion decreases the probability of any one winning.

Talent differential is whatever it is year to year. You still wind up with some talent tipping one way or another, and in fact with regional drafting you can make a case that the there was more talent differentials then than now, as in Montreal had control of French speaking areas and could dominate accordingly, and Ontario may have also provided some talent advantages as well.

Not like that today, it's a pure numbers game, no regional effects.

And in that more mathematically distributed talent environment, with less probability of any one team winning, the >laffs are helpless apparently

No its not.

>Yes, if there are fewer teams the probability that any one of them can win rises.
except in reality this has not occured
the teams that hold the most talent are the ones winning
>Expansion decreases the probability of any one winning.
mathematically perhaps, life isnt an equation though
>Talent differential is whatever it is year to year.
false, as seen by the last 10 years of cup winners
>And in that more mathematically distributed talent environment, with less probability of any one team winning, the >laffs are helpless apparently
so are the other 28 teams in the league

lmao what a sad excuse of a retaliation, that obviously isn't gonna last forever. kings are already deep fucked, chicago is pretty fucked and pittsburgh is fighting for a playoff spot.

Gotta finish 7th grade for that yob.

The American health care system folks.

Those teams major pieces were built before that CBA, with minor holes filled along the way. They had a comparative advantage apparently, and the others struggled same as they probably were with the salary cap, but without the talent stockpile they'd built.

Notice two of them have run through that previous build now and are down with the plebs. Pittsburgh may join them soon.

BUt the post expansion era is what's really under discussion here. And in that era one team has fallen off the map .

>lmao what a sad excuse of a retaliation
you meaning fighting back with facts is sad?
guess you never wanted to have a discussion in the first place
>that obviously isn't gonna last forever
if its so obvious why hasnt it occurred yet?

>BUt the post expansion era is what's really under discussion here. And in that era one team has fallen off the map .
one team?
you give the rangers a free pass cause they won a single cup in fifty years?
not very objective

still won't get southern ontario a cup :)

ok, im fine with that
the idea that the league is harder to win with more teams is moot considering the facts at hand

You're conflating things. Yes, the most talented team often wins. But the probability that one team can win falls with the number of teams added. This is a mathematical certainty.

Your post is rather confused, but to help clear things up, one team is struggling since expansion, despite mathematics, drafting rules, CBA's, salary caps, Gary and whatever else comes along. They still can't win.

They should, because although the probability that any one team can win may have dropped, it still exists, but it hasn't occurred for that team, which is
>laffs

It's very objective, lad. One team is pretty much a mess during that past half century .

>You're conflating things.
because they are both considered when winning
you cant just ignore talent pool due to probability
>This is a mathematical certainty.
if it certain why does the real world model not reflect this?

ok i get it, you want to make fun of the laffs
my posts have nothing to do with a specific team

Oh look the addict fags are back

Reminder that /hoc/ is a Christian General and degeneracy is unwelcome

>still mad at weed
wew

Well yeah, the >laffs talent pool has sucked for much of the past half century, along with coaching and management and moronic fanbase through much of it.

The mathematics and "real world model" indicates that >laffs should have won when it was easier to win, but still should have won when it became harder, yet they haven't.

Not making fun of any team, just pointing out the obvious .

Reminder jesus smoked weed

>The mathematics and "real world model" indicates that >laffs should have won when it was easier to win, but still should have won when it became harder, yet they haven't.
this also indicates that chicago should have won back then and not now
except the opposite is true
>Not making fun of any team, just pointing out the obvious
why do you not include the rangers then when "pointing out the obvious" could it be your anti-leaf bias?

And dated a hooker

imagine not having an anti-leaf bias

Chicago won back then and now, lad.

The >rags won, and have been close to winning, while the >rags really haven't been close at all.

as a leaf having bias against myself seems contradictory

>laffs

Now just how in the h*ck did you come to this conclusion

>Chicago won back then and now, lad.
they won 3 cups over a 83 year period
the probability indicates this should not occur
>The >rags won, and have been close to winning, while the >rags really haven't been close at all.
ah so we ignore the probability yet again

Seeing people debating that the current playoff format isn't great (I personally like it), and tried showing how the playoffs would look in the different formats, thought it was interesting to see:

Current format:
Bolts v Habs Flames v Wild
Bruins v Leafs Sharks v Knights
Caps v Pens Jets v Stars
Islanders v Canes Preds v Blues

1-8 format:
Bolts v Habs Flames v Wild
Bruins v Pens Sharks v Stars
Leafs v Canes Jets v Blues
Caps v Islanders Preds v Knights

1-16 format: (conferences combined..)
Bolts v Flyers Leafs v Habs
Flames v Blues Caps v Pens
Bruins v Jackets Jets v Canes
Sharks v Knights Islanders v Preds

Leave Columbus to me.

Attached: greene.jpg (960x540, 68K)

Looked much better when I typed it out... fucks sake

Current format:
Bolts v Habs
Flames v Wild
Bruins v Leafs
Sharks v Knights
Caps v Pens
Jets v Stars
Islanders v Canes
Preds v Blues

1-8 format:
Bolts v Habs
Flames v Wild
Bruins v Pens
Sharks v Stars
Leafs v Canes
Jets v Blues
Caps v Islanders
Preds v Knights

1-16 format: (conferences combined..)
Bolts v Flyers
Leafs v Habs
Flames v Blues
Caps v Pens
Bruins v Jackets
Jets v Canes
Sharks v Knights
Islanders v Preds

No, probability indicates Chicago should have won, and they did.

Nobody's ignoring probability, but I suspect you don't understand the concept, lad. Are you a >laffs fan?

Smoke weed and take a small dose of LSD and rework it.

I tried

HATE
>anime
>moralfags
>bullying
>evening /hoc/

LOVE
>hockey
>/an/
>cameroon
>morning /hoc/

GM meeting today:
>One item that gained significant traction in GM Meetings today is if a skater loses his helmet, he must come off the ice immediately. Similar to what AHL and other leagues have already instituted.

No, that's fucking gay. We need to pressure shitholes like the IIHF to drop that rule, not adopt it ourselves.

would vote nay

Dude hung put with 12 guys in basements and shit and had really good messages. He was obviously 420 blazed 24/7.

>No, probability indicates Chicago should have won, and they did.
they should have won more though according to your assessment
less teams = easier right?
>Nobody's ignoring probability
you are though, probability states that its harder to win with more teams, yet the opposite is occurring
somehow you ignore this entirely

not a leafs fan and i understand probability fine

>Another rule recommention from the GMs: teams going on the power play will choose which side they want the faceoff to be. Only on first faceoff to begin the power play. Obvious advantage for power play team. The AHL already does this.

Jesus

would also vote nay on

yuck
didn't know the ahl had so many gay rules

did they vote on whether having your skate on the ice while crossing the blueline matters for offside consideration?

If your point is that a mathematical model flawlessly predicts the future and is capable of doing so, you should publish your thesis as the gamblers will make you wealthy for it

I don't believe you understand probability and its valid use in analysis, lad.

What is your age and education, lad, since you're proclaiming yourself as understanding. You really don't appear to be even a little.

This would be in line with D center having to get his stick on the ice first. More scoring chances, which is Gary's drive.

clearing up what is offside and what is goaltender interference seems like the highest priority to me

>If your point is that a mathematical model flawlessly predicts the future and is capable of doing so, you should publish your thesis as the gamblers will make you wealthy for it
no my point all along is that there are other factors than probability at stake when determining the ease of winning

idk how youve missed this
>I don't believe you understand probability and its valid use in analysis, lad.
thats fine, i dont believe you have a competent level of reading comprehension, but im not accusing you of anything
>What is your age and education, lad, since you're proclaiming yourself as understanding.
you asked, i told. im not giving out any more details about myself as they are not relevant to the discussion at hand
>You really don't appear to be even a little.
appearances like probability can be deceiving when you rely on them entirely

This site is for 18 and older, lad.

ez game tonight boys

Attached: pouce en haut domi.jpg (478x598, 45K)

ok, what is your point? are you accusing me of not meeting those requirements?

...it's also not for whiny twinks.

ill be sure to alert them

what you said is retarded. In a 6 team league it's easier to win a championship. It's very simple

if that is the case why did chicago have a much easier time winning in a 30 team league than a 6 team one
its only simple when you ignore reality

da leafs

duh, leafs

They seem to purposely avoid the actual issues; namely what you just wrote, and I do still believe that goalie interference could do with some work too

Because there wasn't many hockey players in Illinois to pick from. Back in the o6 era teams were made primarily by scouting local talent. that's why the leafs and habs dominated.

>GMs also endorsed the idea of having clocks in the corner boards in all 31 rinks. Which we saw in the outdoor games. Will require Board of Governors approval

so talent availability has always had a large role to play when determining "ease" of winning

vindication

the leafs had first dibs on all Ontario prospects, and the habs had first dibs on all Quebec prospects, and they only played against 4 other teams it's no wonder they both have so many cups. I dont know why you say that vindicates your argument. It was easy for the leafs to win a bunch of cups because their only real competition was the habs

Just got the Gary letter
Jackets are going on a 17 game win streak and win the cup
Don’t kill the messenger

>I dont know why you say that vindicates your argument.
what does anything you said have to do with probability?

Would take the face off in the defensive zone desu

Taking my gf to her first NHL game tonight

Don't worry user, the Caps play tomorrow

>how to spot a /hoc/ poster
friendly
knows a lot about hockey
handsome
makes 6 figures
several life experiences
cute smile
excellent puck handling skills
knows several hockey players wives

I wasnt the user arguing with you about probability, but his point is true as well. the leafs cups dont really count because there was only 6 teams in the league at the time and no universal draft so they could stack their team.

Kaapo Kakko desu

>replying your old post that got ignored
grim

When’s a good time to cash in my overseas (You)s? Before, during or after ploffs?
t. First time (You) Broker

>/puk/
Is the new name for /hoc/

I need to speak with Danmark

puck off

the morple queefs dont have any cups and autism trashews is a beaner

Quick unsubtle reminder that niggers are not welcome here

overseas (You)'s are down at the moment due to the recent rash of foreign flags. I'd sit and hold onto them for a bit

Mark from Maryland is not fitting in

>the leafs cups dont really count because there was only 6 teams in the league at the time and no universal draft so they could stack their team.
yet when we reflect on the 30/31 team league with a universal draft, we see that certain teams still manage to stack themselves with talent
his point make have truth to it, but it is far from being the sole factor

How’s the domestic (You) market at present?

this is now a narcissa wright thread

Attached: 1521038891691.png (505x626, 713K)

"No."

those are stronger than the foreign ones atm, cash them out if you have enough

I’ve got dozens of sunbelt (You)s I’m not going to miss at all

i've got a great opportunity for you lads.

if anyone is in dire need of (You)s, but they're currently stuck overseas, you can sign them over to me, and for every three you sign over, i'll instantly cash out one domestic (You) for you now.

Lads I'm dying

Sorry pal that’s illegal (you) intake
I’m calling the IRS

The Leafs are Canada’s team

Stay scared m8

91274750
Sounds like a jewish trick

take me with you brother

Just don't let anyone know they're from the sunbelt, and you should be ok m8

Dont mind me. Just crashing the (You) market

This is the time of day /hoc/ starts turning shit desu. See ya tomorrow morning.

Attached: 1539366709495.png (600x338, 235K)

note how as /hoc/ approaches the 3pm EST threshold that hockey discussion plummets and off-topic garbage skyrockets
as you can see here, im not alone in my reflection

wana heem shannon today lads

Don’t worry user MY team plays tonight

Imagine thinking /hoc/ is for the discussion of hockey 100% of the time. Sounds like you should go back to r/hockey

if you dont want to discuss hockey 4channel offers many other boards tailored to those discussion needs
and if all else fails Yea Forums offers Yea Forums as a catch all

>hockey discussion plummets and off-topic garbage skyrockets
I've been up since 7 am and it's been as bad as this, if not worse, all fucking day.

Shoo shoo not 4 u

>not enjoying anons kitty updates from the vet

I’m starting to suspect you are all just a bunch of shitposters.

He’s on to us lads

Attached: A426D8DA-CD81-4599-ADF3-F624B396945C.jpg (1280x640, 131K)

for me> it's a healthy mix of shitposting, serious hockey discussion, larping, shannon posting, and /croc/

Literally the only highlight over the past 7 hours.

I know you are, but what are we?

this thread belongs in tbqh

well probability says that during morning /hoc/, afternoon /hoc/, read Pacificshit /hoc/, gametime /hoc/, mightnight hours /hoc/ and all the rest of /hoc/ that somebody will remind us that
>laffs

ha ha oh fugg

Attached: finnbeav.png (496x360, 29K)

What do we think of malcom subban?

/hoc/ is for straight white males over 6' who can coexist with shitposters

do you want a meme answer or non meme answer?

He's in the middle

Attached: 4wbc6g16hlz11.jpg (720x567, 37K)

To be fair only SHIT teams play tonight

elite in the shootout. 4-0 in his nhl career, and is 16-16 in shots against.

You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.

both please

That’s a man baby

He's black

Based Marchand. Dubas is a fucking retard.

Attached: cbCn1cB[1].png (500x634, 256K)

too afraid to expose him and be called a raciss

decent
comparison: grant fuhr

as someone who didn't watch hockey for awhile after growing up with it, how painful was it sitting through back to back chicago/l.a. cup exchanges?
i can't think of two cities i would want to see win less

what is brad implying here

that he's actually a fan of hockey too, i'm not buying it personally

if brad recognizes that marner could ask for 12mil why did he only take 6.1mil?
is brad admitting he is worse than marner?

that compared to matthews who got ridiculous overpayment marner is better and deserves even more money

he's just stirring the pot of a rival. idk why that other user is acting like he's based

Redpill me on the upcoming draft class.

>laffs in charge of salary cap management
>laffs in charge of stanley cup winning

Attached: 1A12B1BF-59B6-47B1-96FD-0318FC2B2886.jpg (293x236, 30K)

Bunch of busts

Brad's contract pays him until he's 37.

>1st overall pick is a hot twink.

Attached: jack-hughes-2018-6563[1].jpg (435x600, 31K)

so brad duped himself out of millions by signing a good hometown boy contract in 2012

>this seething leaf

maple leafs r canada team

obsessed

But marner was supposed to be the hot Twink of the league

Somebody post something

leafs have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, toronto is the stinky shithole of canada, and torontonians are stinky turds

Based.

Attached: 1549764554197.jpg (1080x1141, 142K)

jets have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, winnipeg is the stinky shithole of canada, and winnipeggers are stinky turds

flames have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, calgary is the stinky shithole of canada, and calgarians are stinky turds

nice hooters

oilers have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, edmonton is the stinky shithole of canada, and edmongolians are stinky turds

Canada has never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not anybody's team, they never will be anybody's team, Canada is the stinky shithole of the world, and Canadians are stinky turds

senators have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, ottawa is the stinky shithole of canada, and ottawans are stinky turds

not a flames fan, im an user thats annoyed with laffs fans proclaiming the laffs are "canadas team"
get fucked

canucks have never won a cup, they never will win a cup, they are not canadas team, they never will be canadas team, vancouver is the stinky shithole of canada, and vancouverites are stinky turds

the canadiens have won a cup, they will win another cup, they are canadas team, they never will not be canadas team, montreal is the bastion of purity in of canada, and montréalais are angels among us

You should need a minimum cup size of C to be any kind of "showgirl" desu

montreal is even gayer than toronto. take your stupid sounding language and shove it up your ass you frog

based and frogpilled

the only good hockey team in canada are the mooseheads

are french canadiens jerks

i want to round up every leafs fan and chop their hands off saudi style so they cant post on hoc anymore. and just for good measure cut their tongues out too in case they get text to speech. they dont deserve to express their opinions

>montreal is the bastion of purity in of canada, and montréalais are angels among us
so based

How did the rest of you leaf faggots manage to coopt the word "Canadiens" away from the frogs, by the way?

thats not how you spell jets

Did someone say "jerks?"

Attached: hello.png (1267x785, 206K)

based and Dahmerpilled

sounds like a witch hunt

this goes double for the french

I'm the best poster

imagine thinking the leafs will make it out of the first round

Attached: 1B0AEEFF-0FF2-4B75-9113-42FB565B3B1C.png (345x431, 162K)

I can agree the >laffs should get the standard /hoc/ rape and aids treatment, but isn't hand chops and tongue slices a bit extreme, even for >laffs?

just shitposting guys i dont really wish violence on leafs fans or french ppl. dont get me wrong tho id gladly heem them if they put me in a self defense situation

imagine thinking canadas team isnt going to take the cup this year with their improved roster. maple leafs winning the cup this year will be the beginning of a DYNASTY

Fucking overpriced gym memberships for shitty boomers gyms that don't even have barbells

Now there is a good thing to be mad about. But just like dont go to that gym bro.

the 20's will be the decade of the leaf. sorry amerifriends. canadas team is taking over.

>text to speech
Isn’t it speech to text

work out at home

get used stuff, you should be in business for less than $1k

thats like 2 years worth of gym memberships and how do you put a price on staring at the girl's ass doing squats?

how many laffers do you think you could take in a fist fight
think i could get three easily

calm down boris

But I'm moving in the summer I'm not going to build a home gym for a couple months

I did this several years ago, though spent about $2k to get what I needed. Ended up saving money in the long run and work out all the time. I'm no doubt stronger than everyone here and could easily kick all your asses.

go to home depot and buy bags of sand and salt. lift those in your front yard while listening to 80's glam rock.

I'm a snowbelter my front yard is an Arctic wasteland

I bought all brand new stuff from fitnessavenue for like $900 cad
1500lb capacity barbell with 255lb Olympic plates for $300 usd
Curl bar, dumbells, incline/decline bench, squat rack, chin up bar, grip strengthener, foam mat
I think that’s it

then do it in your underwear. the cold will make you tougher.

fuck i need to do this
i'm too socially awkward for the gym and this would solve everything

FINLAND I SUMMON THEE

FINLAND I BANISH THEE

we traded finland and grease to /cric/ last night

>not taking the faceoff in your defensive zone so the other team doesn't try so hard to win it

That's how you will be able to tell the low iq coaches.

best to worst goalies
canada > sweden > usa > denmark > germany > finland

FINLAND I WELCOME THEE

Name one swedish goalie that's good

Did we get any big pieces for them?
Finland was really close to being a franchise player.

>bjs going to win tonight

Attached: sad-ice-hockey-player-stock-photography__x75590510.jpg (299x470, 19K)

>sweden

>canada
>good at goal-tending
maybe back in the 70s

Attached: jarmo.png (1280x1440, 1.78M)

Robin Lehner

probably 5 or 6

They hate us because they ain't us.

finnish goalies are elite

Would you like to build me a sauna in exchange for currency and (You)s?

For me it's having a gym at work that's empty most of the times, pretty nice tbf

lel
poor jackets fans

hes not even a full starter. hes in a platoon role with greiss.

1. French
2. American
3. Russian
4. English Canada
5. Finland
6. Denmark
7. Sweden

suck my platoon role Lehner is elite

good enough for 37 GP and 3rd highest SV% in the league

>1. French
>3. Russia
how dare you

Platoon leader ama

>sleeping on based Russian and Czech goaltending

Attached: 1545855291147.jpg (683x670, 42K)

chocolate or vanilla soft serve ice cream?

He's also on a short leash, it's only a matter of time before he goes off his meds.

generally speaking an elite tendie makes more than 60% of he teams starts in a year.

Name one Czech goalie

Vanilla then dipped in cherry shell

How do we get the devils to play good in only a few hours? Asking for a friend.

>russian goaltending
>based
and lehner is sitting at 57% of the starts
that 3% aint worth getting autistic over

When do vegas and dallas play?

>being friends with grease

Attached: 26B3C476-2A64-46F5-B3EB-0F4C55B2EAFF.jpg (377x465, 86K)

Urzelf

on the 15th

Medal count?

Roman Czechmanek

Thize Dùbz

so? hes still not there. most "elite" tendies start closer to 70% of the teams games. hes made 4 more starts than greiss. hes not even close to being the true starter.

Mrazek
Rittich

A robust 31 medals

Pavel Francouz

the qualifier was "good" goaltender
if you want to move the goalposts and get hyper autistic about a couple of starts knock yourself out

Going to make the next thread lads everyone breathe easy

Nice, for me it's only 4

canadas team thread is already in the oven pal

ahh so when you were defending that sweden has the 2nd best tendies in the league, you thought that a >good robin lehner would make you case?

permashant incoming

if im ever cornered by a leafs or habs fan and i have to defend myself im first going to try non lethal measures

but if the leafs/habs fan persists and im not able to defend myself non lethally, for the sake of argument, if they come at me in public and put me in a self defense situation, im not going to be happy about the devastation, but i will be happy that i defended my own life

i will protect my own life if thats what it takes to protect myself

>ahh so when you were defending that sweden has the 2nd best tendies in the league
got me confused with someone else lad

stay tuned because I might have a good post cooked up for the next thread

if i have to shoot through a crowd of people to defend myself than so be it

it has to be related to canadas team because the next thread is canadas team thread go leafs go

I should let you know the next thread will be elite and it will be /beav/

FYI, I don't have a good post waiting for the next thread

then dont involve yourself next time

...

I’m making vegetarian chili for dinner tonight.

I’ve made /hoc/ threads in Yea Forums and also Yea Forums for the royal rumble

you cant force or rush creativity, lad

someone asked a question, i gave an answer
you drew your own conclusions from there

you carried on his argument as if you were making a point. dont get involved if you dont want to carry on.

i did make a point, robin lehner is a good goaltender

Having a 4:00 keurig lads

N

A

G

G

N

Maple Leafs!

Depends entirely on the quality of the second goalie
Islanders have 2 elite goalies so they start a somewhat even number of games

end of thread reminder that bulju IS generational

E

>r

generational bust?

How to spot a sunbelt hockey fan
>no hockey knowledge
>no general knowledge
>aids
>constantly getting raped

New