Why do People praise pep so much and give shit to Klopp??

you are fat lmao

He also decided to use a 20 year old ballon dor runner up and several players who just won the Euro with Spain
Very hard job he had

>macaco
what ever makes you sleep i guess

The same team (except for Deco and Ronaldinho) which hadn't won anything the previous season.

Because klopp is a communist and hates freedom.

But Pep is pro catalonia who is more communist than the rest of spain

Messi was injured

GOT EEM

21st century Catalan independence is a bourgeois movement

thanks

Pep agrees he need a Barca like squad to win CL
soccerladuma.co.za/news/articles/international/categories/uefa-champions-league/pep-guardiola-responds-to-he-needed-lionel-messi-xavi-andres-iniesta-to-win-uefa-champions-league-cl/650524

>Objectively the best season in English football history
>underachieving

based

I should've clarified, he's underperformed in europe

The beast season in english football history was Wongas undefeatables

Poop will never achieve that

Whats the difference between klopp abd big sam, or curbishley or tony pulis? I like klopp but he has won nothing. And the lung busting football he plays is tactically good in defence, but shit and retarded going forward and not sustainable over a season
>the wind

Klopp has a better single achievement than Pep (winning x2 underdog Bundesliga in a monopoly). Pep has never managed an underdog and won but history only remembers wins, not how you win.

Pep wins
Klopp doesn't
Simple as

>Whats the difference between klopp abd big sam
Based Allardyce won every game as England manager so you shouldn't mention that foreign fraud in the same sentence as him.

because Guardiola actually win trophies

Because pep wins things and Klopp's greatest achievement is running his entire squad into the ground by mid-february

>Because klopp is a communist and hates freedom.
source?

catalonia is liberal, progresive, intelligent and educated

they failed hard under Guardiolel in 2010 and 2012, thats when people realized he's just a bald fraud and since then he only got stacked teams and he continued to fail against the likes of Monaco in CL

so basically san francisco

People insult Klopp because he never admits any fault when his team fucks up. There is always some excuse, he is like an under 8s coach trying to find reason for the kids to not be performing to their parents expectations. So far this year there have been the following excuses for Liverpool losses or draws:
>grass too long
>grass too short
>pitch too wet
>pitch too dry
>too windy
>OPPOSING team had too many injuries
I wonder what the excuse for drawing with Everton will be.

that'as literally fergie when united fucked up

And? Most people rightfully criticised him for that. Difference is, Fergie took a broken club and spent a decade returning it to the top of English football. Klopp supposedly has the best squad in England but is failing to deliver. I also get the impression that you may be a bit of a Liverpool fan, if your first instinct to criticism is to take a dig at Ferguson. For the record, I'm a non league fan so I'm just laughing from the sidelines while my team faces consecutive relegations.
Right now Klopp's excuse making is second in English football only to Port Vale's management down in League 2.

when United were dominating the league Sir Alex can say anything he wanted to say. Klopp has been nothing but serial bottler.

>Klopp supposedly has the best squad in England but is failing to deliver
wut

Klopp disgusts me.
Fake hair, fake teeth, fake personality.
Media kiss his ass.
Won fuck all.

he won the german league with not buyern

Listen to Liverpool and its fans three months ago, they wouldn't shut up about how they had built the perfect team to take the league. Now Salah is exposed, hell, their whole attack is exposed, their defence is doing its best (I'll give them that), and Klopp refuses to change his program, he still is extremely hesitant to sub anyone for non injury related reasons before the 70th minute, he still hasn't changed his approach even though it seems increasingly like they have been solved.

Klopp couldn't beat United playing with five and a half of their starting eleven after the thirtieth minute, and they couldn't beat current year Everton. Klopp can't accept that maybe his tactics are solved, and is instead making excuses.

Klopp has stated in the press that he’s basically a socialist whilst passing it as “Of course I’m a socialist, if you’re not, you must be evil” and is also very pro-EU and mentions it at literally any moment possible.

you're overstating things to the point of absurdity desu.

>based Nigel

Things are only going to get worse for Liverpoop. With the Champions League and City on top of the table with 9 games left, they're not going to be able to rest their fatigued and out of form starters. Their roster is paper thin as it is and I won't be surprised if they get two major injuries between now and the end of the season. The same shit happened with Klopp and his Dortmund side. After punching above their weight, they lost form, became fatigued, and the injuries started piling up before everything went to shit.

Maybe I am, but I am only overstating things to the same point that Liverpool's alumni and fans have been overstating all year. Regarding Klopp's system, anybody who watches the games can attest that I am right about his substitution policy and about the fact that the attack has become increasingly anemic as more and more clubs realise that it isn't that challenging to shut down if you mark Salah and don't bring your keeper forward too proactively. Regarding Klopp himself, I am not overstating to say that he literally blamed his team failing to get a shot on target in 60 minutes of football on the fact that United had a ton of injuries and as such his preparation went out the window.
When first is playing fourth and fourth are missing five of their starting lineup, have no subs for the second half and one of their men on the pitch is hobbling around you expect first to MAYBE get a shot or two in. If they fail in that, you expect their manager to be somewhat disappointed with the performance of his team. You don't expect the manager to say "sure we couldn't win, they just had too many injuries for us to beat them" and expect everybody to nod sagely at his vast wisdom.

its a shame there are no teams in the prem now that just like to kick the shit out of their opponents otherwise liverpools squad would be dead by now.

the way they play kick and rush winds their opponents up beyond belief

City was far from the best team of the league before he came and bought the majority of their starters like de Brown, Sane, Gundogan, Laporte, B Silva, Ederson, Sterling, and more

Wimbledon FC rising from the grave with Crazy Gang members sharing management when?

Would make cup games entertaining at least.

He very clearly is a good manager based on his success relative to his teams.

San Francisco is literally a playground for bourgeois liberal techies. Nothing socialist about it in the slightest

lmao i love how people pretend that united were somehow crippled in that game. they had arguably the best midfielder in the world, the 19th highest goalscorer in PL history who is only 25 years old, one of the highest paid forwards in the world, a their entire first choice defense, and they just bunkered the whole game. obviously having to keep a gimpy rashford out there and running out of subs are major concerns, but you're retarded.

What else would you call a team that has 2 of the starting eleven dropped to injury a couple of days before the match, then getting four (4) injuries in the first half hour? A team that has to use all three subs in that first half hour, and one of those subs is a player who was brought on getting injured, meaning that only two of the starters get subbed off?

Beginning to get the feeling you lost relatives in the Sheffield Shoah.

i already told you what i'd call it. very clearly, in fact. they weren't at full strength. nonetheless, the side they had out there is still a top 6 team, easily.

Fair enough, but again, you would expect a top of the table team to beat a top 6 team when they have 60 minutes against ten and a half men. Note, it isn't like De Gea pulled off a spectacular performance saving ten howlers and getting man of the match, he could have had a nap for the second half because Liverpool didn't even show up.

Again, I'm not shitting on Liverpool per se, I'm shitting on Klopp for failing to admit any fault in him or his players after such an embarrassing performance. I don't know how you can accept the spin that "we couldn't win because they had a bunch of injuries and playing against 10 and a half men threw our preparations right off". Say what you will, but City or even one of the other top 6 teams (as off form as Tot and Chelsea are) would have picked United apart in that second half, and their managers would have ripped their team apart if they failed to do so.

04/05 Chelsea is the best team in English history. They conceded 15 goals all season and should have been unbeaten except for a bullshit penalty given at City.

Because klopp is managing a shit team with shit fans. Least city has no fans.