*ruins football*

Asking the important questions user.

Something clearly made for girls, not for grown men

They weren't. Chiellini dived

Based weeb VAR room

VAR is the best thing to happen to football since offside rule

>no VAR
>waaa stupid ref, refballing etc etc
>VAR
>waa stupid VAR, varballing etc etc

Attached: 1527192733188.png (553x278, 88K)

>he rates braindead VAR wankers
lmao

Morata didn't foul Chiellini and it was a great goal. VAR is bullshit

Idolmaster, don't know if that's the cinderella girls one or not.

but VAR was right today

Attached: BAR.jpg (750x524, 288K)

It worked as intended. The mission was to save Justventus and they did the best they could.

Because rules of football are subject to interpetation and context matters, in cricket (or tennis) the answer is binary (or at least can be given statistical significance which has been simplified extremely well)

"Football" as you call it was ruined as soon as it was created only women play SOCCER, HAHAHHAAHHAHA kys

so true

Lmao

Attached: 1550703135177.png (618x685, 733K)

My only gripe with it is that the decisions are still inconsistent as all fuck. One could think that having two extra refs in the monitor room would ease it up, but nooooooo, you still get bull like yesterday, when they disallow Morata's goal based on him pushing the defender, but somehow allow the second Atleti goal with the same defender being pushed again. Nigger referees can't even be consistent throughout a single fucking game.
Fuck off with that shit.

>MUH continuous flow
>with all the slow downs, time stealing, diving and complaining to the ref resulting in breaks in "the flow"
Ya blind or something?

only got one decision right yesterday, the Atleti penalty. The other decisions, the morata 'push', the otamendi 'handball', and the fernandinho penalty foul started outside of the box. Referee didn't even have access to the fucking replay on pitchside during the first half of the schalke game.

Attached: 1540269414631.jpg (854x960, 99K)

this is seriously the biggest problem with soccer, it seems like NOBODY knows the rules or how to interpret them
It feels like the same act can be called a foul or not or any given day, there's no point in VAR if there isn't a clear set of guidelines for calling fouls

The problem is with interpretation. You can't get perfect guidelines on some calls, that's just how the sport is. People have to admit it's sometimes 50/50 shit (handballs, active or inactive offside,...), but I get why you would get mad if it goes the wrong way.
Then there's people like who plainly don't know the rules (it can be a penalty as long as the foul ends into the box, for exemple). You can't win with those guys because they're just lazy and use their ignorance to complain.

>The problem is with interpretation.
It just seems to happen too often, I've watched too many matches where the commentators are split 50/50 on the call and they're supposed to be experts and have access to a million different camera angles and slow mo. Even when you know exactly what happened the """experts""" are unsure
Sure you can't write perfect guidelines but there needs to be a little more refinement to it, seems even with a handball there's uncertainties over whether being deliberate/ non-deliberate is important or if it leads to control of the ball and other rules that fly around.
Of course it happens in all football codes where there's uncertainties but I don't think to this extreme, and the consequences of a penalty kick are so much more extreme than any sport, they pretty much win matches

*doesn´t mind griezmann diving and Pogba being offside in a fucking WC final*

Argh, I want to kiss these bellies all at once.

*delays the game 5 mins for something that's up to the referee's interpretation and will still be argued about anyway*

Even if you write refinements, it will just make the rules more complex and people will still complain anyway.
I think that the rules in football are way more fair than in something like rugby, but since it's such a low-scoring sport those decisions feel more dramatic to fans.

"Experts"/pundits/commentators don't know jack shite. They're a bunch of retardos in studios literally talking shit. Not once and not twice have I heard the so called "experts" complain about ref following the rules and carding players for offences they don't feel are significant enough - especially heinous with tactical fouls, shirtpulling inside the penalty area and time-stealing bull.
Same bunch will always complain and talk in excess about ""controversies"" when a guy's big toe was on offside (as seen on this x250 zoom from our orbital satellite, footage not on VAR feed tho :^) ), but giving a pass to a player stomping another one, because apparently "there was no force behind this stomp other than his mass and he was looking different way the moment his heel made a contact with that man's knee lmao".

How can shirtpulling being called in (with a yellow) on the middle of the pitch and, at the same time, same shirtpulling inside the box not being called more fair than anything in rugby, mon ami? How do you justify that?

>players faking injuries every other minute is a 'constant flow'

Things like handball could be done just like the way they handle touching the ball with your foot in field hockey, intention or not it doesn't matter it's always a short corner on in the case of football a penalty. Downside is you can expect something like 3 penalties per game but at least the rule would be consistent.

Rugby is "unfair" because the rules are very opaque and subject to interpretation. So in some situations (mostly rucks and scrums), a lot of the calls look made up.
The lack of consistency in football referring is another problem. I think it has a lot to do with "unwritten rules", like how a defender is free to screen and obstruct a guy to "protect the ball". It should be a foul, but it's never called. Same for the shirt-pulling, it's an obvious pen but people call it "harsh" when it happens. Look athow mad fans can get when the ref give a second yellow "too easily' despite the foul being obvious. I agree that it's bullshit, but I don't think it's the refs' fault here. When they follow the rules to a t, they get slammed by everyone.

That would be a complete mess, players could aim for defenders and get free pens all day.
An interesting idea would be giving indirect free kicks instead when the intent is not clear. Why did they almost disappear?

I still don's see rugby as more (or even as) unfair as footy is. Granted, I only watch high-profile international tournaments.
Anyway, refs' fault is that they lack the balls to follow up on their own decisions/calls. There been too many a times when they awarded a yellow to a player and then let him foul again and again and again before carding him for the second time. All the ugly shit in footy rises from this lack of consistency. Hard rules my man: shirtpulling? freekick! shirtpulling in the box? penalty! talking shit to ref? yellow and ya better shut yer yap or else it's another one! And so on and so forth.
Sure there would be some (many) complaining about all the breaks in the ""flow"" but after a season or two the game would become much more fluid and uninterrupted.

And otherwise you'll get defenders deliberately handling the ball, with hands "in green zones".

Attached: neue handspiel-regel der fifa.gif (705x887, 31K)

not giving a penalty for a handball is what he is trying to say i think. after winning the world cup with cancer football and diving you could atleast speak out for a rule change. that doesn´t change that you brought it home. stand up for future justice