They is so brave

>Gender is an oppressive social construct
correct
>Gender is meaningless
how the fuck would it be oppressive if it were meaningless?
No one has ever said this

apparently it is somewhat important to him, because he spends time on it

Gender is like sexuality (and plenty other things): it isn't strictly binary, it's a whole spectrum (eg. between heterosexuality and homosexuality, there's the whole spectrum of bisexuality). If you refuse to acknowledge that reality, it's obvious you won't understand that.
About "gender is a social construct": consider that a sexe isn't entirely related to a gender (eg. butch females, effeminate guys). etc. This is something that was actually existing for a loooong time but now it isn't taboo anymore (well it is, because it still shocks people).

thugger is the real intergender icon

Attached: file.png (818x1066, 990K)

the poopoo on our pp is a social construct by oppressive cis white males

(being nonbinary doesn't imply being homo)

Meaningless as in, "it's made up and we don't need it"

like i said, dick in the shitter

because he's a narcissist

dilate

being unnecessary is very different to being meaningless
segregation was "unnecessary" and still there were people who spent their lives talking about it for some reason

braver than you

>dick in the shitter

>takes a dick in the shitter
brave AF squeezing a penis through the sphincter thank you sam very cool

imagine being so outcast from civilised society that you're still homophobic in September 2019

sure, but I don't understand how coming out as non binary and asking for they/them helps him at all other than by indulging his feverishly self obsessed mind. It's the definition of first world 1% problems, all the time he was thinking this crap he could've learned to play an instrument. He might as well announce "I identify as the most handsome man to ever exist and encourage everyone to agree with me"

is a cis man who paints his nails a case of stolen valor? i'm just asking because everyone who's capable of taking a dick in the shitter is a hero

>dick in the shitter

fuck me where i poopy daddy
>national anthem plays in the background

>reality
It's not a reality. In fact it's all theory as far as the scientific research on this subject matter goes. We can't explain it yet, so hailing it as "reality" based on a bunch of loose anecdotal evidences is dangerous.

yeah and I don't get why rosa parks wanted to sit down when she was perfectly fit. fucking narcissist bitch imo

>takes dick in the shitter

no we're not doing this again

you're unemployed right?

i love going on Yea Forums.org to street-preach being a conformist loser to mentally ill people it's a really fun and productive hobby

Is dick in the shitter considered brave now, Yea Forums? I wasn’t aware of this development

no just got home from work, about to take a walk. taking dick in the shitter a fulltime job for you?

most of them aren't mentally ill they're just second-world

Seriously, he's the new Rosa Parks? Millionaire telling people to call him they because he's a dumbass is the same as penniless old lady fighting segregation to become a first class citizen in her own country. You heard it here first

DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER

>Thom Yorke?

It introduces a host of health risks, obviously yeast infection and HIV.

idk but I guess you can compare people without saying they're the same

you can, doesn't necessarily make it a good comparison tho

Gay dudes be buying $7 bars of soap from Whole Foods to wash the shit off their dicks.

>it's another "Yea Forums doesn't know what non-binary is" episode"

Attached: 8d429c2814d4b21d.png (684x657, 484K)

Enlighten us then, oh so wise xir.

non-binary = dick in the shitter

Most people – including most transgender people – are either male or female. But some people don't neatly fit into the categories of "man" or "woman," or “male” or “female.” For example, some people have a gender that blends elements of being a man or a woman, or a gender that is different than either male or female. Some people don't identify with any gender. Some people's gender changes over time.

People whose gender is not male or female use many different terms to describe themselves, with non-binary being one of the most common. Other terms include genderqueer, agender, bigender, and more. None of these terms mean exactly the same thing – but all speak to an experience of gender that is not simply male or female.

We get it, you take it where you poop.

>blah blah dick in the shitter

male/female is sex not gender

Okay but why not just be an effeminate guy or a masculine woman? What happened to tomboys and fairys?
Changing your label to me seems much more oppressive than just saying "I'm a gay man, but I like to wear a dress and makeup from time to time".

okay thanks dork

>it's another libtard thinks we care
A fag is a fag is a fag

Okay, and my preference is to disregard that for people I do not know.

read a book at some point in your lifetime

lmfao ok dweeb

Is it true non-binary means peepee in the pooper, Yea Forums?
Don’t get mad, that’s just what I’ve heard!

clearly not if you're here commenting on Sam Smith

No.

I suggest you educate yourself and take a dick in the shitter.

mac milar

See you soon!

PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
PEEPEE IN THE POOPER
>PEEPEE IN THE POOPER

Ok, the part I'm struggling with though is: who cares?

>he putted his dick into my shitter and i coom
hold up
swag

Try being coherent next time.

>t. too much shit in the dicker

GIRLS WHO ARE BOYS WHO LIKE BOYS TO BE GIRLS WHO DO BOYS LIKE THEY'RE GIRLS WHO DO GIRLS LIKE THEY'RE BOYS

I feel like you can’t be non-binary/trans if you have a beard

I’ve never had any type of sex in my life.

>t. closet homo samefag

what a good thread

Does dick in the shitter count as sex, Yea Forums?
Look, I’m just asking for a friend, okay?!

How the fuck is this a good thread?

I thought non-binary was like you're between male and female so isn't it theoretical you could have facial hair?

>t. dick + shitter

Yes.

DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER
DICK IN THE SHITTER
>DICK IN THE SHITTER

Ramping up publicity in order to start rolling out a new album, this is nothing new.

always fun to see the reactionaries seethe

Attached: catsanddogssmarter.png (500x339, 177K)

Yes, that is a form of sex.

I heard it was non-binary somewhere too. This shit so confusing, dawg

"it's epic" -me

Ya'll ever shit so big you bussanut and fuggin coom?

Whoever told you that was wrong.

Gay = Dick in the shitter
Non-binary = Dick in the shitter
Trans = Dick in the shitter
Faggot = Dick in the shitter

dick -> shitter

Dyke = Pisser on pisser

Sneed = Feed in seeder

>not celebrating sodomy in 2019 makes you an outcast
>it's 2019 and we lgbtlmnop are still marginalised and oppressed!

At least get your story straight, degenerates.

imagine being over the age of twelve and not taking a dick in your shitter. incels, grow up.

This. Faggots are unhinged and slowly destroying themselves (and thats a good thing)

yum

haha faggot

Non binary is a label that cis people use so they don't feel excluded from the lgbtbbq and can still talk shit about straight people

>i tell him to put the pp where i poopy
HOLY FUCKING BASED

he be sucking dicks that's been in another man's shitter

Ok ok, they can have a moustache. But that’s it!!!

Technically you can be non-binary and only want to fug women.

what about a little stubble?

Attached: 1566960356748.jpg (759x988, 149K)

It's 2019.

Autistic children lecture world leaders about climate policy. Men give birth. Little boys twerk in front of baying crowds in gay clubs.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a dick penetrating a human shitter - forever.

Define womanhood without using sexist stereotypes or biological essentialism.

(Protip: you can't.)

fuck's the matter with you, little bitch? too much of a pussy to take a dick in the shitter?

>wait, you hate transgender and non-binary people? user, didn't you know I was trans? too bad. I'm calling the date off

Attached: ariana.jpg (1032x1290, 135K)

I only fuck pussy. Men don't turn me on ahah.

what are you fucking gay?

*beats to death and uses the trans panic defense in court*

nothin personnel

Disgusting amount of makeup.

No haha. I'm a guy and I like women! You are being very silly, user.

only the retard hick states still have that

Looks like it could be peeled off with a knife like the skin of a potato

It takes a high IQ to take dick in the shitter.

>promulgating social determinism in 2019

Attached: 585aa9b84f6ae202fedf290e.png (445x482, 74K)

considering prostate orgasms feel 100 times better, only an idiot would prefer ejaculating over taking a dick in the ass

imagine choosing just one and not both

hello? based department?

>promulgating
You may as well have put in all caps "I'm a complete fucking retard and take dick in the shitter"

>no, sorry. i don't date ignorant transphobes

Attached: muller.jpg (720x900, 53K)

that's cool, i'm not interested in attractive women anyway

Why is GENDER, of all things, such a problem for some people? Why is this hard to understand? Literally just look down. Any over-complication beyond that is pure cope.

too bad. no feminine peepee for you

Attached: muller2.jpg (1080x608, 45K)

Are you referring to our genitals? That's sex not gender.

because it's the zippy new brocial media trend for white kids

it's a lot more complicated than that. there is such thing as a feminine penis.

I've jerked off plenty of them and it's really cute seeing beautiful trans girl cum.

Attached: muller1.jpg (1080x1350, 104K)

Gender divorced from sex is a vacuous concept. It has literally no meaning.

That's just a man who looks like a stereotypical woman from the year 2019 though. It's really simple.

this

>gender: dick in the shitter
>sex: dick in the shitter
name one (1) thing i got wrong, oh wait you can't. dubs and you die.

POO POO PEE PEE

she's so cute and adorable. i just want to cuddle with her, french-kiss her and jerk off her little feminine vienna sausage

Gender is stereotypes slapped on us from when we were pronounced male or female. It changes depending on time, place and culture. Therefore, you could argue it is vacuous.

No one can even agree on which stereotypes are legitimate and which are sexist/oppressive, so it's basically all bullshit. If English was like Japanese and didn't have gendered pronouns, there would literally be nothing to argue over.

Japanese society is still pretty sexist and patriarchal, so it would find a way. I'm also pretty sure there different way to mark gender in Japanese.

Absolutely not!!! 100%! NO!

Gender Abolitionism is the way.

Rude :(

Attached: 1557366257842.webm (480x544, 1.45M)

gibs me cute trans girlfriend

Attached: hunter_gag.webm (480x480, 761K)

Thinking about this a male/female person calling themselves 'non-binary', probably makes it a hell of a lot harder for Intersex individuals to articulate their shared experiences of someone biologically outside the binary since birth.

Men and women still sort themselves into social roles, yes, but if someone XY dresses and acts like a stereotypical XX, there is no fundamental identity change or official anything.

A raging narcissist

no

Non-binary is the new "i'm not like other girls/boys". I 100% guarantee Sam Smith will not be non-binary in 10 years time.

We need to be teaching kids that anything they do is an extension of their sex (as determined by XX/XY) and not gender. A boy that likes baking is manly because he is a man. A girl that likes playing rugby is girly because she is a girl. Rigid gender roles in USA have infected the world with trans ideology and genderfluid nonsense.

"Owned him" by not knowing who he is?

non-binary is the new dick in the shitter

Rev up those dicks and shitters boys we're taking this party to

>this comparison
holy shit lmfao

I do, it's a new mental illness.

woah dude you're so edgy

Money is not a social construct, it's a practical construct. Fair deals are a social construct.

Brave and genderpilled

what?

LOL

>he doesn't understand that there are different norms and expectations for men and men
that stuff is not genitalia, and it falls under gender

Faggot is a non-binary term

>look mommy. i called them faggots again

It's called gendersnake.

is it just me, or is Yea Forums obsessed with anal?

Attached: Screenshot (90).png (1920x1080, 456K)

>laptop user

Attached: Autism Dog.png (281x281, 152K)

feels good man

>that taskbar

Attached: shaggyshagster6969~2.jpg (246x246, 16K)

What about ftm?

Nah, I’m not non-binary

You told me that when you was sucking dick, faggot. You said to be calm and listen to the wisdom of liberals... then you was on this pretty boy D

gibs me cute trans girlfriend

Attached: hunter_really_cute_yellow.jpg (1080x1080, 269K)

>girlfriend
>dick in the shitter

no-op trans girls are the best. you know how to make them orgasm and it's such an awesome selfless feeling when you're fucking the shit out of a cute trans girl and you manage to time it right by giving her an incredible prostrate orgasm while you jerk her off and she ejaculates her legs get so wobbly you have to hold her to stop her from falling

Attached: hunter_schafer_cute_collar.jpg (900x750, 53K)

>dick in the shitter
Nah, the shitter stinky, lol

stinky in a sexy way

Attached: hunter_queer_love.webm (1920x1080, 2.15M)

Funny you think anyone gives a shit in here

I give a shit. I also pack a lot of shit in.

you stick the dick in the shitter

And cis girls' shitters aren't stinky?

Social politics are so boring and tiresome. Just like Sam Smith's music, really.

Unlike a particular artist's music, social politics are something we are obligated to participate in in order to rectify injustices. If you don't want to participate, have the decency to fuck off and just keep your opinion to yourself. Don't vote for the reactionary pieces of shit because otherwise we're gonna kill you.

of course not. cis girls shit out strawberry icecream

Fuck yourself.

>Don't vote for the reactionary pieces of shit

I don't vote for anyone.

Good.

How can you identify as an expectation?

Literally comes naturally to humans.

Don't feel too good about it nigga I don't even live in the states to vote against you. Have fun with another 4 years of Trump lmao.

Already a pessimist, don't think I'm unaware of what is going to happen. All the actual baby boomers have to die before we can get anything done here.

why are there so many trannys on this board?

Attached: 1505861658278.jpg (653x648, 73K)

They've always been here and I'm happy that they are opening up to everyone.

We'll have bigger fish to fry when that time comes. Bullshit identity politics will be taking a backseat.

Like what? Climate change? I hope you don't believe it has something to do with religion or some bullshit like that.

But it isn’t a social construct. There are men and women. And they are different for biological reasons, but not that fucking different, which is why everybody has some of the other in them too. It doesn’t mean you aren’t a man or a woman.

If the idea is to break free of categories, and it must be, then why the hell hurry to lodge yourself into a new category? And why force others to use your system? That’s where it reveals itself to be about power. Accept that man and woman just relates to your genitals, and just express yourself however you want, that’s something I can respect

Climate change is a bingo. Or maybe some sort of major conflict fuelled by climate and resource issues.

Man ≠ male
Woman ≠ female

here's another edgy comment: herpes is a disease

>Don't vote for the reactionary pieces of shit because otherwise we're gonna kill you.
Day of the rope is coming faggot.

We are already living in a post-scarcity world, friend. But because of boomers (they exist worldwide) and the rich people to whom they are mentally enslaved, we are unable to properly legislate ourselves out of this forced "scarcity", which is also known as the profit motive.

based and checked
you can be a man and do whatever the fuck you want

How old are you? How much money do you make? Your numbers are tiny and when all the old people who share your views are dead, we will effortlessly overwhelm you politically. Enjoy the illusion of power that you have for this very short moment.

jej

Won't be post-scarcity when we can't grow crops.

That would be more like neo-scarcity. Post-scarcity means no scarcity. There is no real shortage of anything at the moment, we just force people to pay for it or starve. That's what needs to go.

I accept what you're saying. Except...
>That's what needs to go.
You'll be waiting your whole life for this to change, but it never will.

Dumbest leftist myth of all dumb leftist myths.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198966/

theguardian.com/environment/2010/aug/01/insects-food-emissions

qz.com/africa/1426889/world-food-day-scientists-say-we-need-to-eat-more-insects/

theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/02/to-save-the-world-eat-bugs/283970/

Attached: YfOF7Kn.gif (684x784, 611K)

You think so, but I believe, as a pessimist, that humanity can meet this challenge. Lots of terrible people have to die though. We're talking people who openly admit that they believe in "race realism" and that poor people deserve to die. I think everyone (except those people) can agree that they are bad people and they deserve to die.

I am an advocate of lab-grown meat and food printing technology becoming a primary target of research.

“The poverty of our century is unlike that of any other. It is not, as poverty was before, the result of natural scarcity, but of a set of priorities imposed upon the rest of the world by the rich. Consequently, the modern poor are not pitied...but written off as trash. The twentieth-century consumer economy has produced the first culture for which the beggar is a reminder of nothing.”

John Berger.

Wrong. That is exactly how it is. And that’s not traumatizing. It’s just much easier for everyone. Not being allowed to express yourself is not good.

What we’re doing these days is decide by convention that it can’t be just a label, that it has to mean something, and that being mislabelled should indeed be traumatizing. It will lead to a fractalization of your version of gender, and it will amount to a second name in terms of specificity.

Why design our society to be fragile and uptight? Why design it to have more things to feel traumatized about? Why not design it to rise above it, and to not need those fucking labels?

Sure, those evil people that you speak of are shit and their deaths will not be mourned.

But I still don't think things will improve too much. Because I still believe by that time, there will some significant issue facing the whole of humanity. We will look back at this time and laugh at how lucky we were to have the luxury of worrying about trivial identity politics. So, Sam Smith can take his pronouns and his shitty boring music, and shove them up his ass.

But who knows? Predicting the future is a fool's errand and I am fully prepared to be wrong.

>it's another conservahicks get triggered by what other people do with their lives thread

No, there have been very directed investigations by various research organizations into understanding what gender really is. Talking about fragile and uptight, are you not the one who is obsessed with keeping things the way they were before our understanding broadened?

We only produce enough food to feed everyone an unbalanced and nutrition-poor diet. Furthermore, feeding Africans will explode their population growth even further. Populations will continue to grow until they hit a ceiling of death, whether it's from food scarcity or scarcity of some other resource. It's a mathematical law of natural selection -- populations will always converge toward the highest birthrate sustainable for a given environment. The concept of scarcity is baked into what it means to be a reproductive organism subject to natural selection. You will never get around scarcity.

If you want to feat on insects in order to facilitate Africans having a birthrate of 7.0, be my guest. I'll be over here building a big beautiful wall to protect my family from climate refugees and hoarding filet mignon.

Basically. They all need to fuck right off.

I'm well-off, educated at the doctoral level, and I'll continue to build a fascist movement in America. Keep seething.

You realize that as places modernize due to less poverty and improved infrastructure, birth control use increases as well? This is even happening in Africa. So it kind of disproves your racism, yes? Because you are of the view that Black people are dumb monkeys who just fuck all the time, correct? Not being aware of the fact that people in those places have more children because they need more bodies to actually provide physical help around their subsistence farms in their small villages? Basically you're an idiot.

Social constructs aren't meaningless. Race isn't a biological concept, it's a social construct but that doesn't mean race is meaningless since everyone uses it and our culture uses it.

Another example is money. Money is a social construct, doesn't mean money is meaningless.

Real working class hero’s are dead. Any “ordinary individual” will have been financed by some pressure group in the modern world. Enjoy clown world

Lol your numbers are dwindling. You will be overpowered by leftists quite easily when all the old people are dead.

Attached: united-states-population-pyramid-2016.gif (610x425, 61K)

guess whose grandkids are gonna be brown

Attached: pewds.jpg (225x224, 9K)

High birth rate populations will always dominate low birth rate populations, even if the net growth dips down for a bit while selection occurs. It may not happen in a way that's obvious -- for instance, the selected populations are most likely selected for high religiosity and fanaticism. Those who are fanatically religious will eschew birth control, and in turn they'll eventually dominate the population by numbers. It may sound like a meme to say that Muslims are going to dominate Europe, but it's just a mathematical inevitability. Any black populations that, for whatever reason, reject birth control -- will dominate. Mathematical fact.

Attached: 0CBF181C-FDFB-43B7-8AB9-726342395984.jpg (94x161, 9K)

>he thinks liberalism can be voted out

Attached: 385.jpg (317x267, 12K)

As infrastructure modernizes and scarcity drops, so does religious superstition. Come on man, this is basic social psychology.

The political revolution is very possible. Not taking your politics seriously is the reason you are the way you are.

>posts someone who's full 1488 and doing great work for the cause
cope
Religiosity is heritable.

newscientist.com/article/dn7147-genes-contribute-to-religious-inclination/

ioa126.medsch.wisc.edu/findings/pdfs/1268.pdf

blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2006/11/heritability-of-religiosity/

researchgate.net/publication/321955381_The_Mutant_Says_in_His_Heart_There_Is_No_God_the_Rejection_of_Collective_Religiosity_Centred_Around_the_Worship_of_Moral_Gods_Is_Associated_with_High_Mutational_Load

I also recall that most atheists from religious upbringings eventually return to their religion later in life, but I'd have to find the study.

Furthermore, the world is becoming more religious, as you would predict.

theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/27/religion-why-is-faith-growing-and-what-happens-next

That field is pseudoscience. I’m concerned with not making society fragile by convention, yes. If you can express yourself how you want, isn’t that the core need? That’s strong, and it’s something I believe you can actually have.

Adding complexity to feel sore about is a game without a ceiling, and it’s also much less likely to get compliance from others, since you’re upping what you need from others.

Biden's numbers are tumbling. A center-left candidate like Bernie has a chance if this momentum keeps up. The right wing (and the alt-right) media keep bringing up the topic of social services outta nowhere and attacking the idea so fiercely that it looks as if Bernie is the candidate they fear the most. That free publicity seems to be aiding him more than any left wing media outlet ever could.

LOL religious faith is declining in places with advanced infrastructure. You’re talking about places where people still pray to their gods for a good harvest.

>thing I don’t like is pseudoscience
It isn’t, but you are “free” to believe whatever shit you want.

Bernie has almost no chance. His polling has been stagnant throughout his campaign. In fact, he's been slightly declining from the numbers he had when he announced. Warren has a better chance than Bernie, which is why she recently passed him in the polls.
Any heritable behavior that boosts fertility will come to dominate a population. Why don't you understand natural selection? Being predisposed to fanatical religious belief is one of the fittest traits you can have in this day and age.

>they/them
for some reason so many of them are programmers and possibly autists

Attached: chrome_2019-09-14_10-34-51.png (600x460, 253K)

Natural selection he says. I bet you’re that guy who tells people to read Foucault.

Foucault was a pedophile.

>Children with ASD were over four times as likely to be diagnosed with a condition indicating GD (Gender Dysphoria) (OR 4.38 [95% CI 2.64–7.27], p

trannies are reactionaries
read deleuze

I just think there are so many possible ways to put that data together, and what has emerged is often arbitrary

Deleuze was also a pedophile.

Lol so basically you’re the other Yea Forums pseud, but you’re a cryptofascist so you can’t even justify claiming intellectual status.

I'm not crypto. Fascism has a much richer philosophical tradition than anarcho-communism. Kropotkin is dogshit.

Much gayer, more like. Bunch of racist dudes talking about penises.

I doubt you could even make sense of the Wikipedia page for Actual Idealism.

Sure I can. I can describe the whole thing in two words. Horse shit.

Wake me when trans people start spitting fire at these bicscum who vandalise and piss on the gender roles that trans people treasure.

Sam Smith is going to marry a genetic woman and have 2.5 children and send them to a good school. He's the male equivalent of a lipstick lesbian - LLs do it to get male attention, SS is doing it to get female attention.

This is so cry for attetion

Bisexual just means the attraction to people who lie more or less at either end of the gender spectrum, because people do exist that are mostly masculine or feminine. It also means one can be sexually excited by both male and female genitalia. Very simple. Bisexual people don’t have such feelings for nonbinary people.

it's perfectly consistent. It just takes one outcast to attack you in a public space

>I don't get it
>therefore it doesn't exist
jfc go back to school

Attached: 1560716259564.png (689x323, 116K)

this is common knowledge brainlet

aaaaaah the innocence and naiveté of being cis & heterosexual
lol

>>>r/erping

What do you mean by "they"? There is only one person in that photo

Bisexuality is fine. It means liking two specific things or paradigms.

Nonbinary is pure narcissism.

If it weren't, they'd be attracted to fat people.
The more fat you have, the more nonbinary you look. It's ugly because it obscures your sex. All beauty is sexually dimorphic, and I respect and sympathise with trans people for trying to achieve their ideal.

Because they have an ideal that isn't getting attention for being noncommittal, as if the entire world was waiting with bated breath for Sam Smith to go cock only - because his sex life is just so important and interesting, almost as interesting as his own reflection is to him.

nonbinary is not related to sexual attraction
how can you write so much without knowing anything?

You're right. It's not sexual, because that requires being either a male or a female.

A nonbinary person can do mitosis if they get self-absorbed enough. It's an orgasm of self-admiration that splits them into two half-sized clones.

HOW DO YOU SLEEP WHEN YOU LIE TO ME

No you’re not you just want to trigger cis boogeymen

>sexuality requires gender
more non-sequitur claims

Reminder that conservahicks get triggered by non-binaries because they themselves are too unattractive to ever pass.

Pass what?

Turing test

I could say something about biology, but that reminds me of a more interesting topic.

You're aging pretty fast.

Am I going anywhere with this? Yes, actually, the same direction as your life by the time you get too dried up to be attractive any more. I'm not sure if you're a twink or a girl, but the same rule applies: you're only pretty when you're young, and your noncommittal, non-reproductive slutting around is going to get less and less frequent, and not because of any decision on your part. You'll be left in a cul de sac you willingly went down: the shrivelled nonbinary senior who can't get a date, whose clothes were fashionable a decade or two ago, whose small-minded friends from school have all settled down.

>I'm not sure if you're a twink or a girl
epic put down post bro but I'm a straight cis white male
I'm just vaguely aware of current societal issues (unlike yourself)

by the way feel free to tell me "something about biology" that I don't know already and isn't completely fabricated lmao

>Gender is like sexuality (and plenty other things): it isn't strictly binary
Yes it is. Why do you think americanised English is the only language that has a gender-sex distinction that only came to prominence very recently? Go ahead. Name another language that indulges in this stupid shit. Gender, or what you refer to as "sex", is real. What you believe to be "gender" isn't.

You could've just said you're a cuck

yeah and at some point we didn't have a word for electricity either
great argument dumbass

And at some point Americans didn't exist either. That was a time when humanity still had hope to not go to shit. Look where we are now. You're scum of the earth. The embodiment of all evil and everything wrong with us as a species.

I agree with this 100%.

Men are male, women are female and intersex people exist but are rare. Other than that do whatever you like but don't force your new terms on everyone.

The non-binary thing relies on stupidly narrow views of what constitutes masculine and feminine.
Why say someone is feminine when you can be more precise and say they're caring or delicate or whatever traits you're actually trying to talk about.

not american either
the ad hominems all miss

Yes you are.
youtube.com/watch?v=Rr8ljRgcJNM

>using homophobic as an insult

No shit, he has plenty of it to spend

Not any more than any other rock star. Or indeed the hip kids out on a night out.

imagine taking pride in being a faggot...

>(((they/them))

I shall not shower for two years nor look at my reflection. You're gonna get the job interview aren't yah? [he said sarcastically]

You should see the lorry drivers, they have not moved in time.

>why yes son they're all raging faggot as is natural of all retarded Yea Forumstant

Just like autism. A spectrum

>They've always been here
nah, they've been ousted every time they mention their mentally ill bullshit here. Hell, trans artist are rare and their music are just like their shitter, its full of dicks and shit.

not an argument

ahhh dick in shitter

Imagine defining your entire existence on what your stick up your anus

itt: victims of viral marketing

These social structures gonna change so much in the next 20 years there's no reason to bother and figure them out.

literally who

As the result of a nuclear holocaust?

Hopefully.

>consider that a sexe isn't entirely related to a gender (eg. butch females, effeminate guys
How does being butch or effeminate make you less of a man or a woman?

You have to realize that a giant chunk of the population makes no distinction between sex and gender. If you have a Y chromosome you're male and a man. If you don't you're female and a woman. If you have a chromosome defect you're some variety of intersex.
If you're a man and don't conform to the standard masculine image that doesn't mean you aren't a man.