Erik Satie fucking sucks
Erik Satie fucking sucks
French Impressionism as a whole sucks.
Overrated yeah, hes a composer for some simple music but people who try to call him a great up there with Chopin or even someone like Mozart is just laughable
i like his music
He (as well as Debussy.) inspired me to learn theory and delve deeper into Classical. He's a legend and he composed some really beautifully sad music. Not everything has to be super grandiose and dramatic to be good (although judging by how this board treats Russian composers poorly also) I'm well assessed that if it's not Baroque, it's not good by your logics.
Chopin and Mozart were the only composers positively name dropped in this thread, and neither of them are baroque. One is romantic, the other is classical.
That being said, as important as baroque was, it fucking sucks to listen to.
he said himself he was trying to make furniture music. its not thinking music. its supposed to be background music. analyzing it in the smae way you would people who were trying to make compositionaly complex music is besides the point.
>He (as well as Debussy.) inspired me to learn theory and delve deeper into Classical.
Very based.
Bach is shit.
Bach is the shit.
Post compositions you've made
Hearing Bach's orchestral suites on the Proms. Garbage. People have low standards.
Proms suck and his suites were not his forte
I think he's referring to the classical general threads where they suck Bach's Cach.
No. But Satie sucks.
youtube.com
The rest of Bach's music sucks too. Trash.
No, your country's zoomer festivals suck
It's just Bach that sucks cock.
Bach only resonates with people who work hard, don't endulge and are earnest and sincere.
I now know all about you that I ever need to know.
And the greatest thing is, you don't even see (and refuse to admit) how bad you just exposed yourself.
Based
Bach resonates with people who like shitty music.
He's definitely worthy of study if only for his influence, aesthetic judgement lies outside of any real objective jurisdictions, I'm afraid.
That's just straight up wrong.
French baroque is a think, they're just straight up krautfags most of the time.
Trying to imagine what kind of music you might like feels like staring into the abyss.
I just like good music and Bach fails to meet that category.
Reading what you just wrote was honestly more hilarious than infuriating to me
>baroque fucking sucks to listen to
Maybe if you're deaf
chopin fucking sucks
Entry level Chopin sucks, but his etudes, polonaises, and mazukras are good.
that is not true, only some of his music was composed with that intent. this misconception comes largely from john cage. there is a depth to the music of satie and a relation to medieval church music that Ravel and Debussy owe a heavy debt to. He did not possess their craftsmanship or their virtuosity, which is why pianists sneer ("It's too easy!") but generations of composers have recognized his impact.
Baroque music sucks ass.
That's because Bach is shit and you finally accepted it.
This dumb thread is now Erik Satie /general/
proto-jazz from the 19th century incoming
>tfw want to get into classical music but hard disk is full and too poor to buy another one
classical music sucks
only his Furniture Music was an attempt to make 'furniture music' and even that stuff is compositionally interesting and worthwhile for modern music makers to consider.
Lol please stop
60 IQ post
Bach sucks dick. Stay away from him and you might actually like classical.
Satie was not just a dour neogothic weirdo, but a prime fin-de-siecle French wit. Modern classical music listeners could use a dose or two of his humor.
>Implying simple is somehow inherently worse