GOOOOOOOOOOLDEN SLUMBERS FILL YOUR EYYYYYYS
SMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILES AWAAAAKE YOU WHEEEEN YOY RISE
GOOOOOOOOOOLDEN SLUMBERS FILL YOUR EYYYYYYS
Adrian Walker
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Eli Hill
you all good user?
Jackson Scott
Not even the best song on the album, maybe 3rd
Joshua Reed
I don't think this is a pissing contest. But John is the third best Beatle
Luke Lopez
Can't handle all this edge. Ouch
Parker Roberts
>But John is the third best Beatle
What is this ranking about? Singing, songwriting?
Jonathan Ross
1 Ringo
2 Lennon
3 McChicken
4 Hairy balls
1 Octopus
2 Heeeeaavvy
3 GS/Carry/End
Noah Watson
MLC (major league cope)
It is just an objective truth... PM>GH>WB>RS
Ryder Russell
IID LIKE TO BE UNDER THE SEA
IN AN OCTOPUSSY GARDEN IN THE SHADE
Juan Miller
sam stop posting frogs and sois everywhere its not funny
Michael Cook
1. John
2. Paul
3. George
4. George Martin
5. Clapton
6. Ringo
7. Pete Best
Dylan Barnes
Paul was the best musician. Although, John was by far the best songwriter, so I'll give you that.
Joshua Brown
>John was by far the best songwriter
why is this always insisted? All of my favorite songs are mostly Paul. I would say they are equal but I find Paul better. John may have been a better musician but I don't think that true is either
Juan Nguyen
>why is this always insisted?
Because all of my favorite Beatles songs are mostly John's.
>John may have been a better musician
Definitely not.
Jace Diaz
Jose Thompson
CPR
Andrew Roberts
okay I see the dilemma here. People who like either John or Paul respectively regard their songs as "better" but can concede that the other was a better musician although there were all mostly equal considering no classical/technical training.
I mean we all know the story of the time that John Lennon made a french horn(sic?) player quit recording during "A day in the Life" because John was being a dickhead and couldn't grasp the concept that the he was asking the horn player to play outside of his register
Christian Murphy
>People who like either John or Paul respectively regard their songs as "better"
Not really. I like John's music, not John. >they were all mostly equal
Paul was clearly a superior musician, by many reasons.
>A Day In The Life
At least John gave the amazing idea of the orchestral crescendo, so he's cool.
Adam Ortiz
Ethan Brown
that was John's idea and not Martin's? Either way it is pretty chilling and awesome
Cooper Green
>To fill the empty 24-bar middle section, Lennon's request to George Martin was that the orchestra should provide "a tremendous build-up, from nothing up to something absolutely like the end of the world".[45]
Chase Sullivan
where is that from? Not saying I doubt it at all. I am just interested in Beatles' literature. I read Geoff Emerick's (EMI engineer) autobio with the Beatles for a class I took
Liam Walker
lmao I'm not OP, I only posted the Octopus's Garden one
Oliver Anderson
Walter Everett's The Beatles as Musicians: Revolver Through The Anthology
Jonathan Hughes
nice. It was cool because Geoff Emerick actually came to speak to the class. I can only describe this professor as a stalker fan who even had glasses and a scruffy hair top unironically
Cameron Adams
this is the only correct ranking
1. Ringo
2. George
3. Paul
4. John
Blake Smith
>hurr durr the ugliest and most replaceable is obviously best
go away please
Ayden Young
Frog reddit back
Ryan Bennett
ok understandable, have a great day