I, for one, am really enjoying it

I, for one, am really enjoying it.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 97K)

Don't worry, that's everyone at 13. You'll grow out of it in due time.

At 13 i listened to Samael and Bathory and the decades between my 30th and 40th birthday were mostly filled with Josquin Desprez and J.S. Bach but I'm gonna go ahead and trust your judgment there.

Yeah, you sound like the insufferable shitbrain that would like Tool.

But in all seriousness why do people care about these guys so much? I’m only 21 so I’m too young to actually remember these guys but since they were put on Spotify I’ve been listening and I seriously don’t get it at all. It just sounds like grunge mixed with corny prog rock.

You lack self-awareness. Like most people who listen to Tool.

Yeah I get that a lot. Josquin Desprez is not really inaccessible. The foreign-sounding name, together with the fact that you never heard of him is what grinds your gears. I can follow that. Josquin is actually really enjoyable and accessible. Also try Orlande de Lassus while you are at it. It's food for the soul.
Source: I semi-frequently have sex.
I'm willing to entertain that thought. Please elaborate what exactly constitutes my lack of self awareness.

He's shit, your taste is shit.
Also
>Listening to Bach after graduating
Embarrassing.
Source: I frequently have sex.

>Source: I semi-frequently have sex.

molesting stray animals doesn't count

Attached: 1563122418051.jpg (960x960, 224K)

(you)

>tfw op took your shitposting bait
>tfw another user continued it for you

Attached: 0120012322.png (374x307, 194K)

Well, to me it seems that Bach has a rather large œuvre to dismiss him altogether after graduating.
Duly noted and not having bearing on my initial statement.

Seriously this. Does anyone actually unironically listen to Tool and Bach and pretend to have sex? Because I don't listen to either and I have sex frequently as well.

They were basically the trend setters for that particular type of rock that everyone at the time tried to copy. They brought something relatively new to the table and they're respected for that.

Think Nirvana for comparison. Their music wasn't "ground breaking" but yet they got a lot of publicity and created a movement that stormed the mainstream which was followed by a lot of bands trying to emulate them. Now they're celebrated as icons and innovators.

Tool are pretty much the same but Tool actually applied Maths and Science equations into their music or something like that, which hadn't really done before and they get a lot of admiration for that.
Either way, if you're someone new listening to them you probably won't get the same impact as someone who listened to it at the time of release when that sort of material was new.
They're still great though.

What's so bad about Bach, e.g. his cantatas? I mean so horribly bad that you have to rely on twitter word constructs such as "unironically listening to sth.".

look at all these faggots. if you have to proudly proclaim on Yea Forums that you have sex then you dont actually have sex. I know I have sex.

Who said anything about "proudly", though? And please be honest in the future.

Obligatory fear binoculars.

I can't wait to have it in my hands, and use it to watch forrest gump on a 4 inch led psycho pseudo eye-monitor.
It's radical yo.

Attached: un23nn0.gif (350x266, 1.69M)

>Tool actually applied Maths and Science equations into their music or something like that, which hadn't really done before and they get a lot of admiration for that.
Jesus no, wtf. The fibonacci thing in Lateralus is an isolated thing and Tool is definitely not the first metal band to employ polyrhythms. That goes without even mentioning how simplistic Adam and Justin's playing is, the fact that so much of it isn't in 4/4 is really nothing impressive

Oh it was done plenty before fucking idiot.
There were entire 20 minute pieces composed purely by computer algorithms in the 70s.

>Maths and Science equations or something like that.

Yeass, liiike

Tool CD + CD player = music leaks out from speaker.

It blows (my mind) so mutch like science and stuff like it's a bunch of mad scientists from another dimension bro, it's like fire bro.

Why don't you understeeend like, bro!

go back to kpop general fagg0t

Quote the other post, retard

You don't have the power to tell who to quote what bro.
I was asking you why don't you like undestand like the science n stuff.
Like this board it's like quick to throw retards around but I understeeend the science bro, unlike you.
Listen to tool, and open your science mind inoculus.

For me, it's gay.

I see, I guess I didn't grasp what you were doing. Maybe I should listen to more Tool and open my third eye

Now you're like.... What's the word...
Like now you're talking!
Open your third eye with maths and stuff user ;)

Jesus you autist

pretty shit just like you faggot

do you lift your pinkie while you drink your cappuccino?

Okay my bad chill the fuck out. I just meant they applied it to their music which the mainstream audience at the time may not have been exposed to yet so they get a lot of props for that. It's not hard to understand what I meant.

You mean babysham?

>It's not hard to understand what I meant.
Well it kind of is because your Nirvana reference was awful too. There's nothing original about Tool other than their song lengths and time signatures, and long metal songs and talented metal drummers are a dime a dozen.

How was it awful? I'm not saying Tool have the level of fame Nirvana has I'm just saying they're both respected as pioneers and bringing something new in their respective genres by casual listeners, regardless of whether they were the first to do it or not. They were the first to bring it to the mainstream.

i'll be satisfied so long as it's better than 10,000 days

which, from the sounds of invincible, it will be