Music taste is subjective, no genre is better than other

>Music taste is subjective, no genre is better than other

Attached: 1516004397439.jpg (988x1059, 148K)

oy vey

A true statement.

cringe soibaiter

>god tier
prog
krautrock
industrial

>shit tier
(c)rap

>retard starts posting Wojaks

This is what people who listen to rap say. They know they can't defend the genre because of it's glaring flaws, so they claim it's all about "different tastes" and being "subjective".

I thought it just goes without saying that everyone has their own subjective taste in music. Is this something people (even sois) really have to point out?

They say it a lot because rap receives far more hate from rock fans than vice versa. Rappers often express their admiration for rock music and rock in general has influenced the new generation of artists very heavily. Meanwhile rock fans are actively hostile towards rap as a genre.

based
redpilled
cringe

This is true

how do you prove that these "glaring flaws" are objectively true? to what standard?

>n-n-niggers! its the nigger music!

holy based

Only classical is better but otherwise yeah that's true because no other genre matters

Attached: 1560810452757.jpg (739x712, 171K)

*Goes back to listening to metal*

youre really still doing the onions meme user. its just sad at this point

>t.pseud

I mean, intuitively I believe some genres are superior to others, but honestly what criteria could you come up to decide that? The only objective answer is to praise technicality or popularity, and those are both awful measures that will get you praising the most cringey music out there.

Attached: 1562639911998.jpg (621x525, 129K)

>god tier
classical

>good tier
jazz, traditional

>okay tier
electronic dance, rhythm & blues

>bad tier
rock, hip hop

cringe

You're either 14 or 40.

>intuitively I believe some genres are superior to others
you mean you like them more

>Music is subject to objective merit
>the notion that “there’s beauty in everything” sounds good but has never been proven to be true
>moreover this attitude harmful to the artistic community overall
>a discrete set images and sounds are universally considered beautiful while others are not
>this is not a matter of taste
>for the sake of argument one may point to extreme outliers who enjoy looking at Jackson Pollock paintings or listening to recordings of cacophonous shrieking for example
>these so-called artists are merely attempting (desperately) to appeal with novelty for novelty’s sake
>it should make you sad that consumers and producers of abhorrent pieces elect to lie to others and themselves for the sake of appearing innovative rather than working within the venerable, established genera of serious art.

Attached: BCF2A12D-35E7-4B1A-AFF1-5510018CD79C.jpg (480x480, 32K)

>classical
not a real name used to describe music by non tourists
>traditional
traditional what idiot

I think that's because the most of the mainstream rap is absolute fucking garbage. While both genre have shit mainstream artists and shit, rap is much worse now than rock in the 70s to 90s, at least to me.

this but unironically

Based

>not a real name used to describe music by non tourists
i obviously mean western art music you fucking idiot

>traditional what idiot
traditional music, also known as ethnic music, folk music, people's music, "world music", and so on

You have a two digit IQ at best.

But they would be correct if rap was music.

>You have a two digit IQ at best.
yeah you're 14

Nah if that were true and there really was "objectuvly good" music, then it would be possible to get anyone to enjoy it and yet this forum is living proof it's impossible to convince someone to enjoy anything.

The only reason people like a song is because music is a language existing below the subconscious that requires an emotional pretext to have any real effect. That's why people vehemently defend garbage, because obviously it communicated something to them you could never fathom.

>It's not psychobilly

Attached: 1528800758501.png (498x640, 368K)

Attached: aiportraits_1563671537.jpg (512x512, 17K)

Top tier
Classical (Expressionist, Romantic, Neo Romantic) Jazz (bebop, Cool, Traditional) Latin (Bossa Nova, Afro Cuban)
Great Tier
Classical (Classical Period, Impressionist, Baroque, Renaissance) Jazz (Big Band, Traditional Pop) Latin (samba) Blues, Funk
Middle Tier
Soul (all types), Rock (Classic, Baroque)
Low Tier
Rock, Metal, Country, Modern and post-jazz pop, Hip Hop, Reggae, Folk

triggered Rockists

oh I see, "reviewer pseud", the third option

Art can be subjective and objective. That's what great about it.

>nu-classical > old-school
>a bunch of jazz and ethnic popular so high up
>broadly mid-tier stuff in with low-tier

Attached: the don.gif (350x233, 348K)

Uh oh this gif is gonna trigger tripfag big babby brandon!

>this thread

Attached: IMG_20190507_161408.png (896x368, 24K)

I've done plenty of microanalysing of mozart pieces in college and I quite honestly hold Maurice Ravel, Tom Jobim, and Duke Ellington in a much higher regard

When you change “rap” to “[insert genre]”, you appreciate just how low effort this limp pasta is

No other genre has flaws like (c)rap does

What?

Trump will probably win reelection...bring on the tears