Frank Zappa: “FART FART FART POOPY” *saxophone blast*

lmao we were all in the Beatles thread retard, nice deflection

buttblasted by 2 vegetarians and 2 dead people lmao

same
fag

>Frank Zappa is so shitty if there are multiple threads mentioning him they’re probably by the same user

lolol

Attached: lol get rekt faggot.png (660x523, 24K)

Hey man, not that user but just quick question. What makes Zappa shit? He is well versed musically, plays well, the music is clean sounding and quite catchy. Some of his stuff is more Poppy than the rest, but most of it is quite enjoyable. I reccomend you check out Hot Rats and Absolutely Free for some great music.

Nice inspect element.

This is probably bait. Either that or, while listening to Zappa, you fell asleep during all his bangers and only stayed awake for stuff like Return of the Sun of Monster Magnet or Lumpy Gravy.
Oi.
#notall
I'm a dadrocking basic bitch Beatlehead and I still like Zappa.

>oh no i have to say something or else people are going to realise i was rekt online
That's you. Admit that you were defeated, lmao

Wasn't even me.

He just isn’t good at all. His music is grotesque in a bad way.

@89597488
lol imagine thinking this

Let me help you

>But not only is Beefheart more profoundly interesting than any of Zappa's permanent floating seminars in the psychoses of late capitalism, he is also, I think, a lot more interesting (and certainly more likable) than Zappa himself. Zappa receives rather uncritical approval from most of the "serious" rock audience, especially that portion which maintains loyalties to jazz or traditional music. This is mostly because his expert image manipulation has everybody buffaloed: it isn't the products of his apparent musical sophistication that attract his fans so much as the way he has sold the idea.
>It's ironic that the most ardent admirers of such a master of media tend to reject the whole idea of celebrity as star-tripping or some such inanity, when it is his acute and quite cynical understanding of the way celebrity works that has attracted them in the first place. I am often tempted to put Zappa right up there with Bobby Sherman as a selfish exploiter of popular taste. That Bobby Sherman wants to make money while Zappa wants to make money and pose as a successor of Varèse is almost beside the point. There are reports that the new Mothers are warmer, but until now they have shown an overriding contempt for rock music and its audience. The guises of this contempt can be amusing, insightful, and even exciting to listen to, but it's still contempt underneath, and my suspicion is that it isn't good for people.
>But where Zappa's distance from his audience is a calculated means of bullying it into some sort of respectful cash-on-the-line attention, Beefheart really doesn't give a shit. Zappa plays the avant-gardist and Beefheart is the real thing. He does perform, but for once performance and self-expression are almost identical: his detachment is in some sense pure and even innocent, and at the same time he is arrogant as only the pure in heart can be arrogant.

Attached: 819813F3-74C8-47E4-B444-556C508FB88B.jpg (212x244, 26K)

Moreover

Attached: 1970-12-24 Rolling Stone 52.jpg (831x1260, 288K)

No clue who this guy is, but he sounds like a stereotypical Marxist academic. The really insufferable kind.