I'm convinced that only fucking autistic nerds who don't understand how to be social hate The Beatles

I'm convinced that only fucking autistic nerds who don't understand how to be social hate The Beatles.
They're funny and likeable as hell. They created a great relationship with their audience, and their music knew when to be goofy and playful and when to be serious, and they broke new ground the whole time they were doing it. I'm convinced that people who complain about Beatles posting are nerds who don't understand the jokes and references.
The Beatles were the most based band of all time.

Attached: 1565288413698.jpg (401x401, 53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZQS91wVdvYc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The fact that

DUDE BEATLES LMAO

seethe harder soiboys

John Lennon beat his wife

Damn got me. At least im autistic enough to like the beach boys way more than the beatles

>The Beatles were the worst of the British Invasion that was all at once, but nothing at all at the same time.
Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
They never broke the rules like TVU
They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
They never had the swag of The Zombies
They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
And they could never play like The Nice or Hendrix

>They were a "critic" endorsed band meant to be used as a psyop to destroy The Soviet Union fuck niggas.

I hate the Beatles. You’re probably right.

The beatles were literally a boy band for teenagers lmao, fuck off

>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
stopped reading there

Attached: Screenshot_20190815_120855.png (601x347, 46K)

Every statement in this copypasta has been debunked multiple times.

>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
Thank god
>They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
Tomorrow Never Knows, lol
>They never broke the rules like the VU
What are these 'rules' you speak of?
>They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
Not even gonna comment on this
>They never had the swag of The Zombies
Same as above
>They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
lol
>They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
Walrus, Piggies, et al
>Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
Okay?
>They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
lol
>They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
Maybe that's a good thing
>They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
The White Album, you fucking FREAK
>They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
I just realised this is bait
>They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
Is 'the melodies' quantifiable?
>They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
One word: George

>dude 4:4 so groundbreaking
fuck off redditor

Most people who “hate” The Beatles just refuse to worship them 2bh

Attached: 1553633827999.png (2906x1704, 1.7M)

All the best rock music is composed in 4/4 anyway

Based

The Beatles were fucking ugly unbathed freaks when they wrote their best songs

This. Have you ever actually read Doors lyrics?

>DUDE BEAT YOUR WIFE LMAO

Based.

Attached: 1565635476158.jpg (680x481, 53K)

I'm convinced that only fucking autistic nerds who don't understand how to be social hate The Beatles.
Really relevant my mom loves them and says I'm an antipathetic loser.

Things too big for a generation kills the next one.

You deserve to be in a Reservoir Dogs torture scene for this.

This lil nigga smokin hella loud

Very based thread user gj

this btfo's the Beatlesfags

well I agree with you that The Beatles were the most based of all time.

oh no lads looks like john lennon is #canceled lmao

Attached: c60be8b68a6eff7d78ff961.jpg (736x752, 48K)

You know I'm right

The only people who hate the Beatles are pseuds and hipsters who think they're not obscure enough and won't allow themselves to appreciate them.

in fairness, most of those acts shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence as The Beatles

I don't care enough to hate them, but this one guy who said he loved them was a literal autist. He was quite young, though. So he probably hadn't tried much else.

>Pracual Harum

Attached: boomer.jpg (750x375, 103K)

The Beatles' Greatest Strength was walking the tightrope between lowbrow and highbrow - people who think that every good song has to be virtuoso guitar noodling in 5/4 are ironically more shallow than those who can just appreciate a good fuckin song

using wods like lowbrow and highbrow are signifiers of a true moron

Beatles is low iq music for children, Moody Blues are better. And your responces were half assed. Same sheeple mindset like a Christgau pseud. The post is a pasta but shit it shows how retarded Beatlefags evertime. Also Pink Floyd invented more genres in the way we see them than Beatles and Morrison indeed has better lyrics than Hey Jude trite. Beach Boys have better harmonies, objectively.

Haha le funny jokes and references!
Haha remember le epic paul is dead theory? Oh my god that was crazy! And john beat his wife! Haha and all the Beatles made fun of Ringo's drumming!
That's literally every beatlefag thread summed up. They were a poprock band for teen girls who happened to have great marketing. Grow the fuck up.

‘Hating’ the Beatles has nothing to do with the Beatles. It’s just taking a swing at boomer idols. It’s like people who are obsessively atheist. OK... we know you are too clever for God...now shut up and go away.

The most harsh reaction the Beatles should ever get is indifference. There are so many other things in this world that deserve that pent up hatred more than they do.

Cope zoomie

Beatles are a shit band business project that was a psyop and keeps brainwashing band to this day.

I hate their vocals and SPLHCB is top 20 worst albums I ever heard. I love 60's music but I'd rather get a Zombies or a Henry Mancini score than that shit for softbois and ugly whores.

Basically confirmed my analysis. You don't know shit about music, you're just here to pad your personality with obscure shit in a desperate attempt to appear interesting.

The Moody Blues are an irrelevant non-band you fucking boomer.
>Also Pink Floyd invented more genres in the way we see them than Beatles and Morrison indeed has better lyrics than Hey Jude trite
What the fuck is this sentence? This isn't worthy of a response

>The Beatles were the most based band of all time.

They're based, but there are more based bands. What about The Jam? The Kinks?

>Kinks

correct fucking answer

>Moody Blues obscure
Holy shit you guys are plebs. Stick to The Beatles cause the music world hates you pseuds. Just fucking die like your role model and stop talking about this pop garbage.

Non argument, seethe cope, get laid and maybe someday you"ll change for better.

>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
I actually laughed

>>Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
Don't let him have you on that. Oh Darling, Something and I Want You have more vocal variety than their entire careers combined.

People seem to forget that the Beatles rise was organic and even when half their repertoire was covers. Back when they were a supporting act it was basically embarrassing how crowds were more interested in them and the main course. People were grasping at straws to explain it. Of course there were the obligatory Jews trying to market them but that was once they'd already gathered a following.

The Moody Blues ARE pop.
I didn't call The Moody Blues obscure either you dopey cunt. They are one of the most irrelevant bands ever. Even Procol Harum have reverence than anything they've done. You actually like Days of Future Passed? Fucking hell, talk about some of the corniest MOR shit ever made. I'd rather listen to The Free Design.

Both comments say they are obscure or irrelevant. If you find beautiful melodies as shitty organ music you're just a shit taste vocal cunt who literal kindergarden music over well thought pieces, I despise the mediocrity that The Beatles unleashed unto this world and it has nothing to do with fame. There are plenty big names that did much more. Either way don't respond since you're too dense to see past sales and "muh influence".

You have low standards The Beatles vocals sucked. Seethe, trained and proffesional vocalists will always be better than some punks off a street.

>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
Too subjective to prove one way or another.

>They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
Ticket To Ride? We Can Work It Out? Day Tripper? All of Rubber Soul? Rain? All of Revolver? Strawberry Fields? The weight of the rock critic world is against you on that. I never hear of any bands worth shit that say in interviews that they were inspired by the Silver Apples, but a TON or bands pay homage to The Beatles.

>They never broke the rules like TVU
Management kept them on a leash. Musically, they broke rules. Recording songs where ALL the instrumentation was Indian, releasing a single over 7 minutes long, the Abbey Road medley, Revolution #9, Why Don't We Do It in The Road.

>They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
Don't. Just don't.

>They never had the swag of The Zombies
Watch any of their Ed Sullivan Show performances. Watch the Paperback Writer/Rain video.

>They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
Is that a requirement of authenticity? Well then, neither did Dylan, The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, or most other iconic bands.

>They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
Again, a requirement?

>Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
Right. It was a million times better.

>They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
Helter Skelter, Twist and Shout, Hold Me Tight, She Said, She Said, Revolution, I Dig a Pony, Hey Bulldog

>They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
So?

>They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
Honey Pie, When I'm Sixty-Four, Mother Nature's Son, Bungalow Bill

Attached: 1553618602739.jpg (1624x1080, 235K)

Oh piss off, any musicologist worth their salt will praise the Beatles.
youtube.com/watch?v=ZQS91wVdvYc
Here, watch this.

Frank Zappa was a talentless pedophile.

Explain how his lyrics are bad (implying you read all of them and not just the three big hits like the pleb you are)

youtube.com/watch?v=ZQS91wVdvYc
there's one for Paul as well

The more you explore the worse it gets.

Funny how almost every point ends in ""so?" "muh opinion" or some name dropping of shitty Pop tracks. Also calling Beatles better than Ian Gillan means you are brainwashed and actually retarded. Please never listen to good music ever again. We are bettet off without you.

>They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
Lucy in The Sky With Diamonds

>They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
If I Fell, Here, There, and Everywhere

>They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
So?

>They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
And which group is held in higher regard today by people actually IN bands?

>And they could never play like The Nice or Hendrix
The Beatles lead guitarist may have been their weakest link. Ringo is a highly influential drummer, and Paul McCartney to this day still wins many "Best Bassist" polls.

Attached: 1553618661189.jpg (1456x976, 275K)

>Also calling Beatles better than Ian Gillan means you are brainwashed and actually retarded.
I didnt think it was possible to have a more boomer position than relentless Beatles support but here it is
you'll be mentioning fucking freddie mercury next

Deep Purple are pure shlock

You don't have to like Zappa but calling him talentless makes your opinions shit from now on. At least he could read notations and played great complex pieces while being friends with Based Beefheart. Please be a namefag so I can filter your Beatleplebness.

You're a piece of work.

I hope that at least your dog likes you.

If you actually think that subpar soft psyche-pop backed with soundtrack music kitsch (Days of Future Passed) is superior to anything A Day in the Life or MNK then you're beyond saving and need to return to your shanty slum town where you belong

You don't like Rock and should leave the genre. Your shit tastes killed it. Please I beg you go find another interest you no future depressing people.


Same points of "So?" much namedrops and shit. Beatlefanatics are crazy. You are no better than someone who supports Charles Manson (except he had good music)

Too vague, give examples. And explain how Yellow Submarine and Yesterday are on par with Soft Parade or When The Music's Over.

TNK^^^^

A Day In Life is ok Pop tune nothing good sounding. And yeah I like Dramatism from time to time. You should stop living a mediocre life to get it. It feels amazing sailing into the sunset on a Yacht Italy while Days Of Future Passed plays.

Half of Soft Parade bears heavy influence from Sgt. Pepper my god you're a dope your continuity is all over the place

the only doors song with really great lyrics is the end
the other stuff is on par with your average beatles song lyrically

Hey you're pretty good at roleplaying as a boomer you can stop now

I stopped taking him seriously when he implied McCartney and Lennon couldn't sing. Absolute nonsense. Listen to Plastic Ono Band, its intense.

Having opinions that differ are healthy.

Coming up with hand signals so he could get his band to play in time only half as good as the black artists he secretly envied and openly despised, and hiding behind a thin veneer of sneering irony so he didn't have to actually write songs, yeah, fuck Zappa

how does this have so many likes
first of all, it clearly wasn't 'the first decade that women were allowed to be horny' because you had elvis in the 50's
and if their music wasn't good, people wouldn't give a shit about them
they'd be forgotten about like other old bands that didn't stand the test of time

Yesterday has perfect lyrics though. Its a bitersweet love ballad.

IDL who influenced who but Soft Parade is actually fun and interesting musically. SPLHCB bores me to death. The real Shlock isn't Deep Purple who's April is a Morricone level music surpassed the tasteless boundries of Rock. You should hear it fags. That's not some two mintue ballad with cello's.

>That's not some two mintue ballad with cello's
No but Bach was

If this is all you get from Zappa, you need help. How did he despise blacks? He fucking had black members in his band. And hey, at least wasn't some whitewash Pop band. and since you know so much about Blacks. What's your favorite Doo-Wop record? Thoughts on Fela Kuti? Shakara is an amazing tune. Zambian Psych Rock is great also. Osibisa have some cool 60's sounding stuff. Let's talk about something rather than the Beatles. It's nothing new.

based faux-pidgin english poster

Easy pop drivel. Love songs are beaten to death, Morrison about interesting things. Even tired things like Love sounded cool.

I don't give a shit about doo wop but I'll talk Fela Kuti any day.
Don't fall into the trap of thinking he existed in some exclusively black universe, he was friends with white musicians and invited some rando talentless cuck called Paul McCartney to that weird palace he was living in.

If you don't respect pop music as a form, why even care to discuss it?

Yeah it was weird of him. But Paul loves making things with people who are more talanted than him (Stevie Wonder, MJ)
>doesn't care about Doo-Wop
f-f-filtered.

Anyway I gotta go to the Philarmony with my friends. Y'all seethe I'l be back tomorrow and we'll continue.

>How did he despise blacks?
Maybe that was strong of me. Did he fuck Black Tween groupies too?

Stevie may be a fair point but MJ owes his talent to Quincy, my man.

I unironcally like Wings more

>Imagine sharing views with Alan Fucking Partridge

'I've always said that Wings were the band the Beatles could've been'

Attached: hRQjcSpAT9Ok.gif (700x532, 1.39M)

I'd rather listen to Band on the Run nowadays than Abbey Road. It's great, you should give it a try.

I've never rated Abbey Road, for me Beatles 1965-1968 were the golden years.

Admittedly, as much as I have a distaste for Macca's post-beatles shit, Band on the Run is alright.

>abbey road
Sure but why did you pick a second tier Beatles album?

Imagine being this much of a brainwashed fuck. Fuck you.

>91 posts
>28 posters
C’mon Beatles fag, don’t do this to yourself

He wasn't just right about the Beatles

Attached: rvw.png (353x1032, 86K)

Haha,thanks for confirming that beatles are for normalfags,they're to you the music equivalent of 40 year old women gossiping to each other and you love it
Kill yourself

Is Sgt Pepper a good place to start with them? I'm a fan of psych rock and I don't wanna dig through their whole discography.

We need a new The Beatles

best to start with are sgt pepper, mmt, and abbey road IMHO

meh....... there a solid group.... in the same way there is nothing wrong with sliced white bread or ever sliced wholemeal bread ..............