their music is boring, lame and uninspiring. prove me wrong you literally cant
The most overrated band on the planet
Anthony Taylor
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Joshua Taylor
why can't you just not give a shit about them
what is wrong with you people that you can't ignore shit that you don't like
Nicholas Jackson
Oh crap. As a trendhunter, I start to sense that this hairstyle will come back within a 2 years frame.
Nolan Turner
>what is wrong with you people that you can't ignore shit that you don't like
I ignore 99% of the shit I dont like but this pleb band is constantly hailed as the absolute GOAT
Sebastian Collins
Yeah I understand their importancen in music history but by todays standards there is literally no reason to listen to them other than to feel like an enlightened cunt
Christian Cooper
its pleb to hate the beatles
Levi Mitchell
Its pleb to like them
Christopher Evans
Easiest way to spot a clueless non-musician.
Matthew Ortiz
Queen has the greatest disparity between popular acclaim and amount of good music.
Zachary Wilson
Dude you're a fucking retard, the beatles ARE non-musicians,
They know jack fucking shit about theory, they created uninspired bland music for the masses and were only successful becaise they were im the midst of a popular wave of rock.
Gabriel Foster
t. clueless non-musician
Seriously. Learn theory.
Sebastian Rogers
>b-b-but muh melodies
its just boring shit music and Im a musician.
Thomas Myers
you don't have care about melodies. look at the penny lane chord progression. look the at modal harmony of eleanor rigby. look at the different parts of strawberry fields in different keys and tempos that was edited together for the first time in their studios in 1966.
Jacob Cruz
these songs are all boring af why do the beatles get so much praise? there was tons of great musicians pushing the boundaries in the 60s like jimi hendrix, pink floyd. heck even the rolling stones or eric clapton put out better shit back then. why the big circlejerk over the beatles? I just dont get it.
Oliver Brown
because you're baiting. saged and fuck off
Dominic Thompson
Im not baiting and youre not really making any arguments besides "muh musical theory"
Oliver Ward
>melodies
That's not the only thing about music, clueless non-musician. As I said, learn theory.
Christopher Morgan
>learn theory.
will it make their boring music less boring? doubt it.
Ryan Brooks
Jimi Hendrix and Eric Clapton's music did not age well.
Wyatt Hughes
it's literally impossible to ignore the beatles, wtf are you talking about, they're everywhere
Lincoln Robinson
Just give it a few more years and once all the 50th anniversaries have passed everyone will forget about them again.
Christian Turner
>doubt it
Based non-musician.
Sebastian Richardson
Sorry mate, but Beatles are a chad band.
Leo Richardson
Once the boomers are all gone nobody except s o i b o i s will remember this overrated circus band.
Samuel Rodriguez
Why listen to The Beatles when Love, Moody Blues and The Zombies exist?
Levi Evans
Nah, I think they get the right amount of praise. I mean, they revolutionized rock music, fucked with sounds and studio techniques that no one in the mainstream was fucking at the time, they successfully exposed regular people to experimentation, were all great songwriters (Paul and John being genius level), had passion for what they were doing pursuing different sounds and songwriting styles with each album, released several masterpieces in only 7 years.
Man it's crazy how much this band achieved, anyone who says Beatles are overrated are just ignorant. They know nothing about music but pretend they do.
Blake Brooks
The Beatles are easily one of the most important bands. If you like music, you need to grapple with this band solely because of the amount of money and influence they commanded. They defined a decade. If you're not interested in the history of music (even if it's just a particular type like pop music) and only want to hear what sounds good, not what was actually important: kill yourself. You don't deserve to listen to music.
Also to the "muh melodies" user, find me a band from 1963 that played rhythyms like then. Find me a middle 8 ANYTHING like the one on Can't Buy Me Love in 1964. You can't. Stop smashing decades together. This band was massively important. You don't need to like it, but you can't deny that.
Adam Garcia
This.
Even their earlier stuff is great and interesting. Music like I Want To Hold Your Hand and I Feel Fine are written in a such different way than your regular pop music at the time. Beatles was great from the very beginning, from the Carvern days.
Ethan Rodriguez
Yep. Listen to the Billboard top 100 for 1962, 1963, and 1964 for the UK and US. It completely changes after the Beatles first couple singles. Every act starts trying to sound like them.
Oliver Collins
>t. Boomer
Can't wait until >your music fades into oblivion. You know how had more influence than the Beatles? Phil Spector; the Beatles literally stole sounds rather than craft their own (ie John Lennon getting literally triggered because Bob Dylan pointed them out at taking his songwriting style) Beatles are an example of manufactured pop and will only fade away over time.
Ian Gonzalez
>thinking The Beatles sound defined a decade
1960-62 is Rockabilly,R&B, Blues
63-65 - Space Age Pop, Surf, Garage
66-67-Harder Psych, more vocal Funk artists like James Brown and Tina Turner
68-69 - Art Rock, Orchestra lead Funk &Soul, Hard Rock, Proto-Punk and Country/Country Rock was the thing
Beatles sound way too different to define a decade. No band can do it. Unless you're only talking Rock or Pop (cause The Beatles sure ain't defining the Jamaican or French or Russian music scene at the time). It's only US and Uk then. And even a band like The Who showed the "average" sound of the decade better.
Anthony Butler
checked and truthpilled
only boomers give a shit about this awful boring band
Anthony Bennett
>and will only fade away over time
>almost 60 years after their mains formation
>still the biggest and most influential band on the planet
Kek. Dude Beatles are probably even more famous nowadays because of the internet.
Beatles maybe will fade away over time one day but not even your grandsons will testify it.
Mason Roberts
>Beatles are probably even more famous nowadays because of the internet
Sure in China and Poo-in-loo land but American and European teachers are noticing not many kids know how John Lennon or Paul McCarthy are and try to force feed them Beatles and their solo tracks but find the kids are uninterested in such old music. Haha. Get fucked, boomer.
Nicholas Moore
Dude no one is born knowing who is Paul or John. Or Bethoveen or John Coltrane. People teach about them because they did something big in the past.
Your argument is so weak it's liking reading a bait.
Aiden Young
Oh yeah my bad it's not just kids but teenagers as well. Haha. Like I said before, get fucked, boomer.
Nathaniel Adams
checked my friend.
And even then, bands from the same genre and decade perfected the craft better. SPLHCB is the most boring album I heard my entire life. It's nothing but bland "experimental" ballads for skinny grey haired dads who probably think that Christgau or The Rolling Stone mag got something to say, while The White Album is just bloated with filler. It's 30 songs but only like 12 are actual full-fledged songs that vary at all. John's fake deep personality and lyrics are cringe, Paul's bland "give me pussy I'm Romantic" acoustic drivel is cringe too, and Ringo is just too fucked up to make shit worthwhile either. All their albums are overrated. The so-called variety that they clearly lack but replace it with "muh art and experimentation" doesn't mean the songs are good. "I'm Only Sleeping" has terribly annoying vocals and a couple of strumming chords that make Johnny Cash look like John McLaughlin. The song is no more experimental than a Kinks or a Monkees song, but those bands could actually put life and emotion into their music. "Oh, but they added unnecessary guitar looping backwards thingy for 5 seconds" this is the kind of petty shit you would hear from Radiohead fanboys. This doesn't change the fact that the song is absolutely uninteresting. Hell, The Beach Boys managed to incorporate much more mature and interesting facets of culture and influences on one whole album than The Beatles in their entire career while making sure every song is a catchy little Pop number interesting for both the Pop and an Exotica or Romanticism fan.
Samuel Brooks
part 2.
The Beatles were the worst of the British Invasion that was all at once, but nothing at all at the same time.
Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
They never broke the rules like TVU
They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
They never had the swag of The Zombies
They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
And they could never play like The Nice or Hendrix
They were a "critic" endorsed band meant to be used as a psyop to destroy The Soviet Union fuck niggas.
Jacob Stewart
not really, their early works are important to pop music but they go so far up their own assholes by the end.
especially lenon
Kevin Cox
Not him but I had a job at a school from 2014 to mid 2018 and I interacted with several teenagers and you are wrong. A lot of them are into 60s music, Beatles included.
There was even this fat kid who wanted to rock John Lennon look but he looked like a fat version of Liam Gallagher.
Jonathan Sanchez
Ye and also the vocals were shit, the delivery was shit, the lyrics were shit, and Paul has an annoying, childlike voice.
Gavin Davis
>a job at a school
I have several teacher friends at different schools all across the US and they all vary as each school has it's own taste in music (mine was nu-Metal and rockabilly) but the majority of them say that most students don't know how the Beatles are or even what song they sing. Kinda funny that most of them know who 2Pac or Madonna are but not the Beatles haha
Juan Gray
Beatles fans are so fun to infuriate because they can't stand that someone doesn't like the same shitty music that they like. They are like children, which enforces the fact that The Beatles make music for toddlers.
Hunter Evans
All of that music you're talking about is pretty fucking bad.
Mason Cox
Not at all. There is a difference between not liking them and calling them overrated, which is not true.
Charles Sanchez
I dunno OP but I Am the Walrus is pretty cool
Jackson Brooks
I want to know what you like, I wonder what you consider "good"?
Colton Harris
We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
Jack Gomez
>uninspiring
Is that why they inspired so many other bands, user?
Nicholas Reed
see
Andrew Morales
Julie Andrews as Mary Fucking Poppins
Ayden Brown
Well, that's alright but no Silver Apples, Arthur Brown or Moody Blues. So sit in your lane and don't fuck yourself up.
Cameron James
>So sit in your lane
>stand still so I can swerve on you
and that's what simple folk do.
Nicholas Torres
They’re definitely overrated, but still one of the best bands of all time. Their melodies, chord progressions and experimentation made their music anything but boring.
Julian Clark
meh response, still cool you engaging.
Carter Myers
t. doesn't know music theory
Matthew White
>only successful becaise they were im the midst of a popular wave of rock.
You mean the wave they started?
OK
Joseph Bell
Pretty much all of this is wrong.
Matthew Allen
Baitles threads are the worst.
Gavin Harris
>The Beatles were the worst of the British Invasion that was all at once, but nothing at all at the same time.
If Beatles were the worst band, then all bands are bad because all of those bands tried to be the Beatles.
>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
John Lennon was on par, if not better than Jim Morrison
>They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
Tomorrow Never Knows came before 2 years before Silver Apples.
Anyway, Silver who?
>They never broke the rules like TVU
The Beatles were the first band to record an album consisted solely by their own compositions.
They were also fucking with reverb before TVU.
>They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
Are you kidding me? Everyone knows All You Need Is Love, Eleanor Rigby and Here Comes The Sun.
>They never had the swag of The Zombies
What?
>They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
Thank God they didn't, Rock Opera is a shit, corny genre. But they did influenced it by releasing Sgt. Pepper's.
>They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
Since when it makes something good?
>Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
Listen to Oh Darling.
>They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
Listen to their Cavern shows bootlegs for raw Beatles.
>They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
Ok, I don't think they needed to. They had their own style and didn't need to copy every single band at the time.
>They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
I've Just Seen a Face and White Album is Country influenced.
>They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds is literally one of the most iconic drug song you moron.
>They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
Kek what?
>They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
HAHAHA WHAT
Cont.
Samuel Wright
one sentence doesn't prove much.
Grayson Thompson
>They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
They were the first mainstream artist to be openly against vietnam war.
>And they could never play like The Nice or Hendrix
Yea so what? Different songwriting styles.
Cooper Cruz
Thirteen albums does.
Wyatt Hernandez
i cant speak for everything youve listed but
>garage rock
the beatles were primary influencers of this. this is undeniable, and while there were many other british invasion bands influencing the scene you cant really say the beatles were small in any aspect
>psych
you guys always forget about revolver and rubber soul lmao, both of which came out before 68
>art rock
arent a handful of their albums considered art rock or have art rock aspects? sgt pepper? magical mystery?
Mason Long
A lot of this was the result of carefully curated rollout of certain technologies, rather than true musical innovation.
Jacob Jones
>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
youtu.be
>They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
youtu.be
>They never broke the rules like TVU
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
>They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
youtu.be
>They never had the swag of The Zombies
youtu.be
youtu.be
>They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
youtu.be
youtu.be
>They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
youtu.be
youtu.be
>They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
youtu.be
>They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum
youtu.be
>They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
youtu.be
youtu.be
>They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
youtu.be
>They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
youtu.be
Get fucked.
Caleb Jackson
Kek
Ethan Thomas
>great lyrics as Jim Morrison
>Yesterday
Fuck off
Benjamin Brown
>Their lyrics were never on the level of a Jim Morrison
See Across the Universe
>They never broke ground like a Silver Apples
See Tomorrow Never Knows
>They never broke the rules like TVU
See Tomorrow Never knows
>They never wrote a timeless classic like The Moody Blues
5 of the ten most cored songs are Beatles or solo Beatles songs.
>They never had the swag of The Zombies
See The Word
>They never wrote a Rock Opera like The Who
See Side B of Abbey Road
>They never Made fun of or satirised like Zappa or The Fugs
See I Am The Walrus, The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill
>Their singing was never on the level of Arthur Brown, Janis Joplin or Ian Gillan
See I'm Down
>They never were raw like Them or The Stooges
See their first two albums
>They never composed suites and went batshit insane like Pink Floyd or the Krautrock bands
See Side B of Abbey Road
>They never went to their country's roots and folk music like Jethro Tull
See What Goes On, Don't Pass Me By, Rocky Raccoon
>They never wrote Trippy drug anthems like Jefferson Airplane or Pracual Harum.
See Tomorrow Never Knows, She Said She Said
>They never had the melodies of The Beach Boys
See If I Fell, For No One, Yesterday
>They never opened the Rock world to different fans of other genres like Beefheart or Dylan.
See Revolver and Sgt Pepper
>They never were anti-establishment like The MC5
See Revolution, All You need Is Love, Come Together
Joshua Fisher
Reminder that The Beatles created Krautrock.
youtu.be
Christian Myers
>Tomorrow Never Knows came before 2 years before Silver Apples.
Anyway, Silver who?
So we only talking success here? In that MJ is better than The Beatles. Or maybe not, I don't follow record sales as that is something doesn't interest me. Again with the bullshit "1 shitty song makes them genre innovators", next you'll tell me they invented Jangle Pop. Tomorrow Never Knows is a normal simplistic song with again some weird twitchy things but it's not in any shape or form as experimental or groundbreaking as Silver Apples.
youtube.com
This is way better and much more interesting musically for me personally, the vocals are much cleaner and pleasanter to the sound.
>If Beatles were the worst band, then all bands are bad because all of those bands tried to be the Beatles.
This is plain wrong since most these bands came at the same time and some were quite Anti-Beatles like Zappa, Beefheart and Lou Reed.
>The Beatles were the first band to record an album consisted solely by their own compositions.
They were also fucking with reverb before TVU.
If this is all you got from the five Velvet Underground records then I am worried for you. Raw songs about hookers, pure Rock Minimalism followed by an album that supposedly "Proto-Noise Rock" and then a complete 180 with one of the most melodic and textural albums of all time. Reverd has nothing to do with this, we're not talking Shoegaze (although I bet Beatlesfags think they invented that too)
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Joseph Brooks
>muh important
Have you gone through the western canon of classical music chronologically yet you dense fuck?
Benjamin Allen
>please show me
>the way
>to the next
>whiskey bar
>I'M YOUR BACK DOOR MAAAAAAN
>you know that it would be untrue
>you know that I would be a liar
>if I were to say to you
>girl we couldn't get much higher
DUDE SEX AND DRUGS
Yesterday is the most covered song of all time. The lyrics obviously resonated with more people.
Luke Diaz
This is legit amazing
Isaiah James
That doesn't address my point at all.
Lincoln Perez
>The lyrics obviously resonated with more people.
Obviously, because Paul is a mediocre lyricist who liked to write about waking up and getting out of bed. It resonates with more people, because it's mediocrity reflects the mediocrity of banal life.
Nathan Davis
>groundbreaking
How so?
Brayden Murphy
>So we only talking success here? In that MJ is better than The Beatles. Or maybe not
It was just a joke you fucking sperg holy shit
Justin Sanders
Is that why the people who praise Morrison as a "genius poet" are always the dorknerds wearing black who sit at the loner table at lunch?
Thomas Brown
Actually it's because it reflects the mediocrity of the music.
Christopher Myers
>we're not talking Shoegaze (although I bet Beatlesfags think they invented that too)
youtube.com
Joseph Thomas
>we were talking
>about the space between us all
>and the people
>who hide themselves behind a wall of illusion
>never glimpse the truth
>then it's far too late
>when they pass away
>we were talking
>about the love we all could share
>when we find it
>to try our best to hold it there
>with our love
>we could save the world
>if they only knew
>try to realize it's all within yourself
>no-one else can make you change
>and to see you're really only very small
>and life flows on within you and without you
>we were talking
>about the love that's gone so cold
>and the people
>who gain the world and lose their soul
>they don't know
>they can't see
>are you one of them?
>when you've seen beyond yourself
>you may find
>peace of mind is waiting there
>and the time will come when you see we're all one
>and life flows on within you and without you
Isaac Thomas
>Everyone knows All You Need Is Love, Eleanor Rigby and Here Comes The Sun.
I meant that The Moody Blues is not as stuck in time and dated.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>What?
Zombies Had a form swagger seen in other bands like Cream and Rolling Stone.
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Thank God they didn't, Rock Opera is a shit, corny genre. But they did influence it by releasing Sgt. Pepper's
Can't respond cause here it's just your taste, but SPLHCB is an odd choice so let's move on.
>Since when it makes something good?
I thought we were talking innovation and cutting edge? Well, either way, both those artists have done more for genres such as Jazz-Rock, Punk and added character into Rock. As well as bringing the ironic attitude later on taken by Punks, Alternative kids and Hipsters.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Gavin Young
yes. music follows the bell curve of humanity just like all the other arts. something mediocre and accessible will always resonate with more people than something difficult. this is how literally everything works and that's ok. it takes all kinds
Angel Moore
>Beatles had never been this sexy or groovy
Didn't read the rest of your post, but I know you're wrong.
youtu.be
Luke Roberts
The Moodys have like 3 REALLY good albums and the rest is pretty good, but only Threshold is really on par with the most average Beatles stuff.
Connor Reed
Within any given Beatles song, there is interesting and uncommon chord progressions, the bass lines are more involved and specific than traditional rock music, the instrumentation is varied and utilizes rare soundsources, they make good use of studio effects, the lyrics are at times poingnant and surreal, the songs often make use of tasteful modulations, key changes, and time signature changes to renew interest, and within the greater musical tapestry of the 20th century, they were amazingly innovative and influential, with their music crossing many genres and sometimes birthing new ones entirely. And all this is secondary, of course, to their sheer melodic brilliance, which is undeniably why they have such a memorable discography.
Any other opinion is a meme.
Jordan Johnson
Go follow your own advice, idiot.
Adam Hill
>implying Jim Morrison wrote good lyrics
Ian Hill
"most loved therefore most hated"
-Ride, "Hacker"
William Allen
Jim Morrisons lyrics were awful
Christian Cox
t. doesn't even listen to classical
Matthew Gutierrez
>All You Need Is Love, Eleanor Rigby and Here Comes The Sun are dated but Looney Tunes music such Moody Blues ain't
Alexander Robinson
>I don't like people for not liking people who don't like the things I don't like
Eli Nguyen
Musician here. The Beatles were fucking brilliant songwriters. We may never know how genuinely talented they were at their instruments because they understood how to write a catchy melody and hook. They understood that sometimes less is more and technical wankery doesn't resonate with people. It's musical masturbation. The Beatles wrote pop songs for sure, but they wrote pop songs that were interesting and thought provoking and funny and subverted expectations of what pop music could be. They were all brilliant songwriters, and they let every bit of their personalities spill into their music. They created a relationship with their fans and toyed with listeners all the time.
Nathaniel Miller
>tfw Maxwells Silver Hammer clicks
Its so good bros
Robert Cooper
Its also funny when people draw a comparison to The Beatles and modern pop music saying they are one in the same despite the actual content, lyrically and musically speaking, has a much wider appeal. Its just zoomers saying shit like "haha but its old" as if thats anything but a testament to their creativity. These dudes were so fucking creative and they didnt have half the tools to utilize in the studio that todays chumps have. Its a fucking joke when people write them off.
Robert Brooks
Tomorrow Never Knows is a fucking landmark song for sampling and tape loops in popular music and they wrote it in 1965. It was the first song recorded for the Revolver sessions. Let that sink in.
They taunted their fans with cryptic hints and references to their previous songs and fan conspiracy theories and shit before bands like Death Grips were even born.
>here's another clue for you all
>the walrus was Paul
Not to mention all of the weird conspiracy shit on the cover of Sgt. Pepper and the "Billy Shears" nonsense. They were hilarious. Constantly fucking with their audience.
God, I fucking love them so, much.
Isaiah Hughes
I was just watching some of the old Beatles movies yesterday, and they reminded me just how catchy and memorable pretty much all of their songs are.
Ayden Hughes
I would never consider myself someone who doesnt appreciate modern music but The Beatles are and always will be my favorite band.
Brandon Bell
this
Benjamin Barnes
>Listen to Oh Darling.
Nice little Pop filler
youtube.com
youtube.com
I think everyone knows Joplin well enough to know Oh Darling Pails in comparison.
>Listen to their Cavern shows bootlegs for raw Beatles.
Sorry but we're talking music on Studio albums, EP's and Singles. Either way doubt it being anything close to this but I'll give it a listen later on today.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Ok, I don't think they needed to. They had their own style and didn't need to copy every single band at the time.
Maybe, but what those bands were doing was far more interesting, groundbreaking and worthy of notice but it was only in the 70's when they became a band of Beatles fame level.
>I've Just Seen a Face and White Album is Country influenced.
I meant more Folk but sure I'll give you that although I don't like their version of "Country".
>Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds is literally one of the most iconic drug song you moron.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Kek what?
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Masterful melodies, catchiest I probably ever heard.
>HAHAHA WHAT
Dylan for Folk, Beefheart for Folk, Blues and Modern Classical. Maybe stretch either Safe As Milk and TMR are more groundbreaking and original but you'll probably strawman this one.
Anthony Reyes
If that's all you hear than you're deaf.
He did, much better than Lennon and Paul for sure.
Strongly disagree here, Their 60's and 70's stuff is gold and even the 80's work is good although bit cheesy but much less cringe inducing than Lennon's and Paul's solo career.
Joshua Myers
the abbey road medley is arguably one of the progenitors of prog rock
Alexander Torres
>there's a 50s rock inspired song
>there's a blues-inspired song
>there's a classic Sinatra-inspired pop/vocal song with strings
>there's a country-inspired song
>there's a folk song
>there's a weird nonsense song
>there's a metal song
>there's a proto-punk song
>there's a sing-along childrens song
>there's a fucking musique concrete song
>all of this and there's still room for classic Beatles songs
This album is basically The Beatles shitting on all of music, and it's awesome. They riff on nearly every genre in existence at that time, and it still manages to be a good album.
Nolan Morales
I still consider the white album to be the first alternative rock album ever made.
Bentley Lee
They were so fun.
Nathan Martin
Beatles cucked every single band into oblivion the instant they played on Ed Sullivan Show in 64. Since that performance they are the greatest and best band of all time.
The haters can only seethe. Most based band of all time.
Adam Mitchell
This is way to slow and simplistic to be the kind of groove I was talking about, and the vocals are too annoying (and kinda nasally) to be sexy. This is much more akin to like late 60's UK Blues Rock of Cream than The Zombies. And hell, guess what? Those guys were better than The Beatles also!
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Obviously Sunshine Of Your Love is a masterpiece and its the Riff is better than anything George or Lennon played.
Aiden Scott
And they all suck at making them.
Noah Perry
>They were the first mainstream artist to be openly against vietnam war.
Yet it was CCR, Hendrix and those bands that made the Anti-Vietnam anthems that were straight to the point while Beatles stuff was quite vague at least to me.
>Yea so what? Different songwriting styles.
Musicianship matters in serious music.
Ayden Young
They were absolute chads. They killed their idols. Back In The USSR was John Lennon making fun of Chuck Berry and Yer Blues was John making fun of the entire blues genre, and they still manage to be great songs. They literally wrote Helter Skelter just to spite The Who, because they claimed to have written the heaviest song ever and The Beatles refused to be outdone by a lesser band. The Beatles were hilarious and I genuinely feel bad for people who don't understand them. They're so fun.
Elijah Bailey
For me, this album is the sound of a band on top of the world. The Beatles had just come off the success of Sgt. Pepper and they knew they were invincible. They could write anything they wanted because they're the fucking Beatles, and people would but it anyways. There's a song on here about eating expensive food with Eric Clapton, just for the hell of it. This album is what success sounds like.
Cameron James
You are literally right on literally all accounts.
Josiah Gonzalez
>mfw Billy Shears and the Walrus were "Jenny Death when" before Jenny Death when
Jayden Hall
It's gonna spiked up hair, mark my words
Samuel Powell
Would you look at this fucking shitter right here.
All the tracks you posted are almost objectively bad, but not just bad, like really fucking bad. Classic velvet underground fan, a literal retard who can't appreciate the Beatles and thinks hitting the snare more Than once every 5 seconds is equal to "catchy".
The embodiment of the basic Yea Forums retard.
I can't wrap my head around how shit your taste in music is holy fuck grow a pair of ears for fuck sake
Josiah Lopez
Thanks for letting us know you've been pleb filtered, come back anytime.
Cooper Nelson
>something mediocre and accessible will always resonate with more people than something difficult.
By this logic, more people would like the Doors
Levi Phillips
Holy Fuck you're a pleb. The Doors is patricianpilled
Leo Gonzalez
>it needs to be straight to the point to be good
>popular music is serious music
Double yikes!
Cooper Cooper
Nice strawmen
Camden Mitchell
The Doors are good, but they're not as good as The Beatles. Let's be real here.
Connor Diaz
How is Touch Me or Roadhouse Blues patrician?
Please don't use words you don't understand.
Cooper Young
I think you may be stupid if you don't believe that's true also Soft Parade>>>>entire Beatles discography.
Luis Gray
>I think you may be stupid
>Soft Parade>>>>entire Beatles discography.
topkek
James Martin
Beatlea couldn't even play their instruments man.
Isaiah Watson
coping mechanism, it's fucking true.
Samuel Young
my dad liked this band so I like it:the thread
Please Please Me (1963), 3/10
With The Beatles (1963), 3/10
Meet The Beatles (1964), 4/10
Hard Days' Night (1964), 5/10
For Sale (1964), 3/10
Help (1965), 3/10
Rubber Soul (1965), 5/10
Revolver (1966), 5/10
Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967), 7/10
Magical Mystery Tour (1967), 6/10
The Beatles (1968), 6/10
Yellow Submarine (1969), 5/10
Abbey Road (1969), 7/10
Let It Be (1970), 4/10
"Jakub Krawczynski sent me this supportive comment in 2010:
I find it quite amusing that almost all of the Beatles songs have their own entries on Wikipedia (nothing wrong with that in itself, actually), even if they are not singles, and each of them is meticulously dissected as if there were transcendental suites exceeding human comprehension, yet bands like Faust or Red Krayola, etc. have biographies even shorter than just one article about any random Beatles song. Needless to say, none of their songs have any articles on them, yet I'm sure there would be a lot more to talk about. Moreover, if you had put any bad review of their album on the site with the intention to show the broader scope of opinions, you'd risk your "life" there, since such fanatics don't accept any single sign of trying to be objective. You are seen as public enemy number 1 to them. It is like your article is one giant cognitive dissonance to them and vandalizing your bio was the only way to reduce this dissonance."
Wyatt Martinez
My dad has shit taste so I have it too: the post
Robert Moore
i judge on fact not opinion. sales are fact, now fuck off
Thomas Gomez
both of these are true
Oliver Martin
>Meet The Beatles (1964), 4/10
this is joke right?
Jack Long
Please Please Me (1963), 6/10
With The Beatles (1963), 7/10
Hard Days' Night (1964), 8/10
For Sale (1964), 7/10
Help (1965), 8/10
Rubber Soul (1965), 9/10
Revolver (1966), 9/10
Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967), 8/10
Magical Mystery Tour (1967), 8/10
The Beatles (1968), 9/10
Yellow Submarine (1969), 5/10
Abbey Road (1969), 10/10
Let It Be (1970), 7/10
Owen Garcia
There was a lot of good posts made against The Beatles but Beatlesfags only strawman and insult these users rather than continuing a conversation. Beatles fans are more than "fans", they are fanatics like Clairo and Kpop posters who need their own containment place so they wouldn't shit up this board. With love, Mike.
Grayson Long
>Can't wait until your music fades into oblivion
>Cultural impact of the Beatles still being discussed in 2019.
Angel Martinez
My dad grew up in the hood in the late 70s and early 80s. He liked heavy metal and funk and he never cared for The Beatles.
Mason Morgan
You Zeppelin and Kraftwerk?
Nathan Cook
Hence why I said pop music. Fuck classical. Go powder your wigs. Pop music is an entirely different medium than pop. If you try to compare them, you're literally retarded. No similarities whatsoever.
Cooper Morales
>Zombies
This shit came out like 3-4 years after the Beatles did it.
Jayden Hernandez
My dad Scriabin, Mahler, Chopin, Motzart, Duke Ellington, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Space, Vistotsky, PF, Wayne Shorter, Stravinsky, Morricone, Rainbow, Deep Purple, Flamenco, Henry Mancini and The Doors and he thought the Beatles were gay. For once he was right I think.
Jose Barnes
>prove me wrong you literally can't
but you can't prove you right
Thomas Roberts
Top kek
Brayden Ortiz
I read Scaruffi too bro
This is a poor review though l, it boils down to
>”Beatles fanbois are too obsessed with Beatles, why don’t they appreciate my good music more???”
Jose Taylor
> futile drooping links to every late 60s band's most famous songs in place of arguments
retard. anyway this is the only thing that can stand head to head with the beatles in sheer creatively. they went the complete opposite route and did more on their own than the rest of the yobs living in the beatles' shadow
Ethan Baker
>This thread
Americans have shit taste as always
Brody Rivera
>good because different
you know what else was different? fucking french musique concrete since like the 20s
Owen Sanchez
this
Luis Diaz
Juan Allen
prove that they all the things you claim they are, lazy baiting
Camden Bailey
>heck even the rolling stones
>even
m8
Kayden Brooks
>If you're not interested in the history of music (even if it's just a particular type like pop music) and only want to hear what sounds good, not what was actually important: kill yourself. You don't deserve to listen to music.
Yikes!
Brody Jones
eric clapton is the definition of boring technical masturbation, its literally blues rock being recycled ad infinitum
Parker Butler
hahaha
hahahahahahah
youtube.com
Cooper Ortiz
based. you either get the beatles or you don't desu.
Justin Young
Based and lennonpilled
Joshua Morgan
Good bait right here.
Brody Butler
>doesn't get the beatles yet calls other people dense
Thomas Martinez
both of these are true.
Evan Sanchez
I legitimately like the 1966-1971 Beach Boys output better than anything the Beatles did. Not even trying to be contrarian, I still actually like most of the Beatles' albums, it's just a personal preference that most people obviously do not relate to.
Julian Hernandez
not bait. 100% serious.
Evan Phillips
No, I'm pretty sure they played their instruments. There's photographic evidence.
Not an argument
Robert Bailey
>I am right and can’t be proven wrong about my personal feelings on a subjective topic.
Terrible b8 old chap mu should know better.
Thomas Hughes
What can you expect from a "Pop" Band? They are Pop, do you realize? Do you even... 156 replies about discussing Pop Bands business.
William Anderson
All great bands and important in their own right...as are the Beatles.
Someone had to be the best/on top. People would hate whatever band that was because we live in a world of contrarian cunts.
Xavier Phillips
It's OK not everyone can be patrician
Cameron Anderson
There is nothing to get about silly pop hooks.
Hypocrite.
Leo Watson