Honestly were they really THAT good?
The Beatles
Yes
Next question
the beach boys > stones > beatles
I dont know any other bands.
No
No. They have many good songs but most of those are the pop songs of their earlier days. Once they got into all that edgy revolutionary and drug addict stuff they went to shit. Songs like I am the Walrus were fun.
I absolutely loathe the song "All You Need is Love". It's such a garbage song and so many faggots live its message unironically.
no way, it's mostly marketing hype and boomers fell for it hard. Though all the albums after Norweigan Wood are good
It's a good message
No it's a terrible message and song.
>You'll never do anything that matters so lets all just suck each others dicks
>implying there's anything wrong with either of those messages
Basement dwelling virgin detected. Have sex.
Changed the world in 7 years
I've had sex with all kinds of women first of all.
And secondly there is nothing wrong with love. It's the unbelievable arrogance of John Lennon that gets me.
>You can't write or sing anything new
>We can't cause we're the fuckin Beatles but you no all you need is love
Everything about late stage John disgusts me and I'm glad he was shot for real.
Anyone seen Yesterday? I thought it was okay, way less shit than I thought it would be so I actually had a pretty good time.
>disliking All You Need is Love
The world is lost.
Filthy commie junkie cryptokikes. Responsible for retarding an entire generation. They are like the NWA of their time used by jews to turn people into simpltons.
It's commie propaganda.
>It's pointless to strive for greatness
>Learn how to play (((the game)))
>all people are equal
it was entertaining and ed sheern was funny. i was just disappointed that he chose his old shitty life than fame and fortune, due some prissy bitch who could have joined him anyways. the twist was nice, considering the trailers made it look like he would end up getting exposed by the real beatles
the twist was pleasant
>Nothing you can do that can't be done
>Nothing you can sing that can't be sung
It's literally telling you that you can accomplish your goals. How did you get this shit so ass-backwards?
No you got it wrong. It's telling you that you might as well fuck off to an antiwar protest because people can't be exceptional.
not the best, but how influential they were usually makes people believe they were better then they actually were
TL:DR: popular equals valuable
A good band, and very influential, but I prefer other bands from the era (TVU, beach boys, Frank zappa)
was the tl dr nessacery
Hes got a point
You're 16 aren't you
shitty music for stupid hippies
This.
>stones > beatles
Shit taste. Absolutely God awful taste. Stones are absolute garbage.
Overrated hacks. Yeah, they had some good songs but they only had a couple albums where you can actually listen to the whole thing.
No why do you keep trying to guess what kind of person I am instead of defending this trash. Thats right you can't because you are a pseud who can't even read between the lines a tiny bit.
This shit was made for brainlet like you.
Dilate
thats correct, now you know what I think of most of the beatles repertoire.
>Paul McCartney boasts he can't read music! How can you call yourself a musician then? John Lennon was the best musician in The Beatles by a country mile. He was a very talented guy. But George Martin was The Beatles. Without him they'd have been nowhere.
You can't say he's wrong.