Periods of straight up silence

>Periods of straight up silence
>Plain talking mixed in throughout the album
>Instrumental sections are trash: they are boring, uninspired and repetitive
>Brain damage is the only one with a good melody, but even that song is ruined by weird talking and shitty instrumentals
>Nothing particularly difficult or impressive about any of the songs either
>Regarded as one of the best albums of all time

Can someone explain why this is so popular? I just listened to it, and I can't understand why anyone would enjoy it. Do you have to be high for it to not sound like garbage?

Attached: 265673.jpg (246x205, 5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=34ZmKbe5oG4
youtube.com/watch?v=61jfm219ArA
youtube.com/watch?v=qjtRL2Omz6w)
youtube.com/watch?v=5d96q45yt48&t=0s
twitter.com/AnonBabble

released at the peak of the space age coupled with the use of synths to make it sound very spacey. Right time right place. I wouldn't say it's garbage but it's definitely not PF's best work (see: literally anything after this album up until A Momentary Lapse)

bait thread dont fucking reply

>Someone has a different opinion to me, therefore it's bait.

sick quads, homie
also fuck you, OP

>he doesnt like the live at Wembley '74 version of Any Colour You Like
ya gay

nope your "opinion" is objectively fucking shit dude, and the fact that you'd use such terrible bait to try and fling shit at a classic album is actually disrespectful. go die, and i mean that with the utmost sincerity.

Yeah, keep going for the bait then, you fucking retard.

Quads of truth
Saged and move on

>if you're album doesn't align with general consensus, you should die
I'm not even the guy you're responding too but if this is how you genuinely respond to people with differing opinions you're a retard.

I hear reddit has some very good safe spaces and echo-chambers if other people's opinions hurt you so much however.

Listening to an album that you clearly know is very popular, disliking it, and immediately making a thread on Yea Forums asking why people like this "garbage" is not an opinion. It's bait, and if you can't see that you're a bigger fucking idiot than OP.

it wasnt a very spectacular era for pop music.

>70s
>wasnt a very spectacular era for pop music
stop posting any time retard

Attached: 1437431440636.jpg (414x432, 74K)

PF sucks lol deal with it pleb

The silence is necessary to give people a break. Also the break between great gig in the sky and Money is justifiable considering it was made for vinyl and the disc would need to be flipped over at that point.
Instrumentals aren’t trash. The electronic crap was brand new at the time and people hadn’t heard a lot of stuff like that before.
Weird talking is a nice touch and adds to the insanity feeling of the album.
>time doesn’t have a good melody
>us and them doesn’t have a good melody
>breathe doesn’t have a good melody
Difficulty doesn’t mean good or bad. Simple is good sometimes.

You don’t need to be high for it to not sound like garbage, though it does help to be, you just need to not be an underage philistine

>The silence is necessary to give people a break
If the album were half decent, people wouldn't need a break from the songs.
>People hadn’t heard a lot of stuff like that before
New is not necessarily good, and it doesn't explain why the album aged so well.
>you just need to not be an underage philistine to enjoy the album
So a philistine is someone who decides for themselves what they like, rather than following the masses?

>If the album were half decent, people wouldn't need a break from the songs.
Is this what constant overstimulation does to your brain? I feel sorry for your generation.

Does constant overstimulation cause me to prefer listening to music than silence?
Get the fuck out of your ivory tower, user. You're grasping at straws with that one.

ya Pink Floyd fucking sucks

like "The Wall" is a fucking terrible album too (worse than Darkside) I mean on "Another Brick In The Wall Part 2" has probably the WEAKEST and WORST tone out of any "Popular" song.

Listen, @ 7 seconds, listen to how SHIT the guitar sounds.
(Another Brick In The Wall Part 2)
youtube.com/watch?v=34ZmKbe5oG4

But no Gilmour had to play that shitty strat using the neck pick up. Like it sounds like shit.

Imagine if he used a Telecastor with the Bridge pick-ups on. (For instance Keith's guitar on "Honky Tonk Woman" youtube.com/watch?v=61jfm219ArA )
That's the tone they should have strived for.

I mean fuck even if he had just used the bridge pickup, it would have sounded so much better (it would have sounded closer to this guitar- youtube.com/watch?v=qjtRL2Omz6w)

based

not even going to finish reading your post
retard filtered

is this the most retarded user on all of Yea Forums?

I unironically agree.

Has a great atmosphere and feel to it. That combined with its pathetically shallow comments on life gives the appearance of depth

This album unironically fucking sucks.
>b-but you don't understand you have to listen to it on acid!!
Imagine having to be on fucking drugs to think an album is good.
Jimi is good both sober and high. DSOTM is dogshit.

>Periods of straight up silence
>Plain talking mixed in throughout the album
part of what makes it so special

>Nothing particularly difficult or impressive about any of the songs either
That's what makes it so good. It's a pretentious as shit idea that Roger had, to make an album about the "meaning of life" or something, and you'd think he'd come up with complicated music. But it's an album that offer simple answers to complicated questions. Better than literally anything you could come up with if you were give unlimited time and money and immortality

>David Gilmour
>shit tone

Attached: B9F0B4E6-30BD-4B06-AF52-01A04B8257EC.jpg (343x343, 14K)

sir, you are what they call in civilized world an "autist"

That's bullshit. There are thousands of albums with that stuff that are virtually unknown. Also, if I wanted to listen to talking or silence, I wouldn't listen to music.

>it's an album that offer simple answers to complicated questions.
What questions and what answers? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit, user.

Meddle > all

Attached: BBAA391E9FD849ED868F4D1DB300FC8D.jpg (416x274, 34K)

he played a Les Paul plugged straight into a soundboard for Another Brick

Cool, go be a dipshit somewhere else

>BUT LE WIZARD OF OZ XDDD

Good album cover is the key to success.

a bunch of boomers did acid to it so they pretend it s one of the greatest albums ever made even though its a 7/10

The live version is better

forgot to link
youtube.com/watch?v=5d96q45yt48&t=0s

Your arguments were quite justified, but then I saw your other replies and I realized that you are trying too hard not to like the album, yikes

It's a descent album, obviously it's not gonna be super challegening stuff if it sold 40 million copies.

I'd give it 2.5 / 5 or something, few good tracks.

lol, I honestly feel like the people I have replied to are trying too hard to defend the album, and refuse any criticism towards it. If my arguments are justified, then "but that actually makes it good" is not a good counterargument.

>>Periods of straight up silence
>>Plain talking mixed in throughout the album
>>weird talking
>these are inherent negatives
Holy moly pleb cassaroli

Actually, I've rarely seen many people defend this album here, and if it's your first pink floyd album you've heard, you'd better listen to the next 3 albums Wish You Were Here, Animals and The Wall, maybe you'll like one of these.

Superior Pink Floyd album.

Attached: front.jpg (300x300, 20K)

aside from I've only responded to people defend the album.

Correct

It's a little overrated but still good. Time, Us and Them, and Money are all good and the sound effects are fairly tasteful for the album's concept. 9/10. And I listen to KC, Gentle Giant, Soft Machine, Caravan, Yes, Jethro Tull, Genesis (Trick and earlier), Can and Faust all the time, so it's not because I haven't heard enough prog that I like it.