Can we at least agree they were the tightest live band of their time?

youtube.com/watch?v=NCtzkaL2t_Y

Attached: beatles-rooftop-e1548864435814.jpg (740x390, 63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vb7PLolg-RA
youtube.com/watch?v=AIDMqq_fH8U
youtube.com/watch?v=SznCspJ1uWU
theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/07/quincy-jones-the-beatles-were-the-worst-musicians-in-the-world
youtu.be/_zipuTJPaJQ
youtube.com/watch?v=7rQWh62VUHE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

youtube.com/watch?v=vb7PLolg-RA

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 99K)

Are you retarded?

me like tame impala

Yeah you’re retarded

I mean, no. The Rooftop performances show that they were still surprisingly well put together and tight for being so out of practice as live performers, but it was still in a relatively controlled, studio like environment. Just seems unfair to compare that to what bands like The Who or Led Zeppelin were capable of then.

I think you can make the argument that they COULD have been one of the tightest live bands of their time but the comically hysterical audiences they were playing to really prevented them from further developing. They made their name as a live act and you can see that energy and passion in some of their earlier performances:

youtube.com/watch?v=AIDMqq_fH8U
youtube.com/watch?v=SznCspJ1uWU

But still I don't think it's enough to hail them as one of the best of their era, as far as live shows go.

They still probably are overall the greatest band of the 20th century and scaruffi is an faggit.

>tight
>play it like studio version

You dont know what tight means. These are trained monkeys doing a play.

theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/07/quincy-jones-the-beatles-were-the-worst-musicians-in-the-world

good songwriters tho.

That article is dumb shit from a senile old man. Paul is an objectively great bass player.

youtu.be/_zipuTJPaJQ