They continue to push this conspiracy theory

Man made climate change is a conspiracy so companies can receive subsidies, Elon Musk is a good example, received almost $5 billion up to 2015 and that number is surely higher now, Tesla would not exist without the subsidies they received.
Man made climate change is one of the brainwashing lines the digital distribution industry has used to normalize paying for a download and to try to get rid of physical copies.

China accounts for a fuckton of it

Spot on
Environmentalists are not sincere.
The number one cause of pollution, non-renewable resource draining, and (((man made climate change))) if you believe in that, I don't, is the artificially high population of the planet due to Christian style charity/government aid to other countries,outsourcing, immigration, and unfair trade. (unfair trade is trade with countries with a lower standard of living and lower wage).
The population of the entire planet might not be even half of what it is now if not for what I listed above which would be far more environmentally friendly than any other policy.But the majority of environmentalists are also pro immigration, charity/aid to lesser countries, outsourcing, unfair trade, etc which completely contradicts their environmentalist stance
Native born Americans are reproducing at slightly below replacement level which is the right thing to do with millions of jobs probably being removed from the market in a few years with no replacements, gotta keep bringing in those visa workers, illegals, and legals though.
The US does not have a labor shortage or a skills gap, since we do not have a labor shortage or skills gap we should deport all illegals and visa workers and indefinitely halt all future immigration. It would raise wages and lower the cost of housing, especially in places that need it the most like big cities, while also being environmentally friendly
The real problem is non renewable resource usage, which these same "environmentalists" policies make much worse because their policies have allowed for billions of extra people consuming resources that would otherwise not exist without their policies.

op post is ridiculous and it's over dramatization takes away from the actual facts of climate change and feeds into poltards discounting all info on climate science

we enable it. The average person doesn't mind since china is "on the other side of the world" so all the dirt is effectively swept under a rug

this is a galaxy brain take right here lol
"if we stopped keeping so many chinese people alive with our generous trade deals climate change (which is a hoax to begin with) would not be a problem!"

yeah but what about the number two cause
can we do something about that or are we just gonna say fuck it because we can't solve number one

Xi Jinping is serious about cleaning up.That Pres. Trump 'digs coal' is almost like China and the USA naturally want to swap positions in the new millennium.

Song rec, Free Nelson Mandela by The Specials

i hate trump but i doubt we're actually going to bring back coal, i think that was just a talking point to get the rednecks going

I'm right though,
We shouldn't have those generous trade deals, they only weaken the US. I'm a modern mercantilist, minus the two negative parts of traditional mercantilism that capitalists seem to love - subsidies and wage limitations. A mercantist USA would have never allowed China or India to get out of peasantry and would have never exported industry to them which is what allowed them to get out of peasantry to begin with.
Exporting industry just so some companies can maximize profit has given China the ability to destroy the US, to literally kill me from across the world.
Whatever number two is pales in comparison to number one, it isn't even close, you faggots never acknowledge number one and in fact you push to make number on even worse just so you can push Netflix and spotify more and so Elon can keep getting his gibs.
Die.
China's population is inherently anti-environment.

accepting things because "le 97% of scientist believe in something" isn't understanding science either

Boy, I sure hope that article is accurate. Earlier would be even better

the posadist revolution is imminent brothers

>hina's population is inherently anti-environment
I get the feeling that if the Party says to do something the rest of the population will be educated to do it.

Song rec, Industrial Estate by The Fall

Attached: f-xinjiang-a-20190421-870x580.jpg (870x580, 57K)

youtube.com/watch?v=F3-cjwGoxhk
bit on the nose but whatever

This ship isn't sinking. In fact my end of the boat just rose up by 50 feet!

agree. Being an old piece of shit when shit gets real bad is going to suck. Let it happen in my prime

if we agree that corporations unregulated profit maximization at the cost of all else is the problem, why did you become a fascist retard while I became Big Dicked and Cool

>at the cost of all else
Not necessarily, if a US company somehow made money from killing those in Mexico and South America, Africa, and Asia without exporting industry then I wouldn't have a problem with that.

gimme an E, gimme a D, gimme a G, gimme a Y

God, I fucking hope the Chinese nuke your fat asses sooner rather than later. The biggest contributer to climate change has and will always be the US and its lifestyle. Not the brown people down south, not the yellow people and the east.

They really should start culling you suburbanite pieces of shit, the world would be better off without you.

>The biggest contributer to climate change has and will always be the US
You're right as I already explained, the US exporting industry and giving aid to lesser countries has allowed for a population of the planet at least twice as high than it otherwise would be.

Communists are just as big of nerds as Nazis

Sure buddy, keep on parroting the overpopulation myth you got from some youtube video, you lardass. I don't care, the only thing you need to do is blast your brains out. For the sake of the planet.

yeah no shit who said i was a commie

Lmao, they're bringing back coal, you idiot. They're doing it in parts of Europe too, in order to bridge the gap towards "true green energy". And as soon as more and more US nuclear power plants close down because they're too dilapidated, you know that they'll just replace them with 3 vastly cheaper coal plants.

youtu.be/ZgxFh-6uNyo

>(((
Stopped reading there.

but let's not invest in solar, wind, water power, and alternative fuels

Hey man, I'm not telling you what I want. I'm just being clear on what's already happening and what is soon gonna come to the US.

Like the guy that made a carburetor for a car that made it run off water. ended up dead.

youtu.be/IFgBFYkBZ6E

it is already happening we already have people lobbying for it and the rest of the country thinks they're fucking idiots. more proof the conservatives are hell bent on bringing the country back 50+ years.

Nothings legal or allowed by the government and big business unless money can be made off it. That's just how things are, really interesting though.

Global warming won't end human civilization.
>waters rise a bit
>florida and some other shit areas disappear
>people start moving north
wow how horrid

like how electric cars existed in the late 1800's
think i'm bullshitting? look it up.

Did i accidentally click on pol? What about music?

Attached: 1560852037546.jpg (903x885, 87K)

you think water level is the only thing affected? read a book or two please.

figure ill be managably balding until then so its good timing. 2045 might even be better if they could start the whole end of world thing then, that would be ideal

listen i hate to see this bullshit as much as anyone but honestly i'd rather talk to climate change deniers than sixnine fans

GM put a stop to that. Imagine what the world world be like if we built off the original ideas of the worlds most creative and brilliant inventors, with out ripping them off, and watering it down for profit.

not a music thread

>all citizens combined only account for 10% of the world's polution while 70% is done by 100 corporations
this
africa could be populated by 3 billions more people it would barely pollute more than the West and international coporations

If you by "The West" you mean regular, average people living in The Western Hemisphere then no they aren't the biggest culprits; it's largely China and India by a significant margin.

By invest you mean subsidize