Which one Smashing Pumpkins or Nirvana

>Nirvana
Left a greater impact on the bigger music scene paving the way for the next wave over underground and mainstream acts
>Smashing Pumpkins
Created more technically interesting and innovative music fusing alt rock, post-punk, shoegaze, goth, etc to create a better sound than their peers.

Answer is pic related

Attached: 5899.jpg (900x900, 301K)

>Created more technically interesting and innovative music
literally the only person who thinks that Smashing Pumpkins is "technically interesting" or "innovative" is Billy Corgan himself

Attached: 1540738188183.gif (320x240, 1.58M)

Cobain was a shitty guitarist

Attached: 7600035.jpg (557x293, 29K)

>Created more technically interesting and innovative music fusing alt rock, post-punk, shoegaze, goth, etc to create a better sound than their peers.
Lmao
Lol
Kek

its punk rock guitar what do you want

>le edgy maymay
>but but but he not good at stringydoos!!!
kuck

based billy

Nirvana cuz Corgen has a gay ass whiney voice

billy corrigan could write a good pop song and he played guitar
he had a good stage presence
nirvana were better because they were weird and not constantly trying to be cool and slick
smashing pumpkins always posing too much trying to convince me of something
nirvana good sense of humor and more honest

This

excellent observation, carlos
SP aren't bad, but they (read Billy) always seemed to be trying to be something they weren't, whereas Nirvana knew exactly what they were

Smashing Pumpkins have to be the most boring rock band of all time. Maybe even more than Foo Fighters.

tbf, he wasn't trying to be a good guitarist.

pumpkins was better when they were a melodic psychedelic hard rock band
the angry goth thing was retarded and embarrassing what kind of cock eyed ham fisted marketing ploy?

Attached: killedkurt.png (648x1217, 753K)

thats a good point, probably why i hated most SP stuff after 96 or so

shut up nigger