Pour one out tonight for Varg's deleted YouTube channel

he had a TP2 up yesterday and it was deleted by this morning. I wouldn't spread the links to his new alts around too much, triggered zoomers will report them

This is great for accelerationism. Nationalists will be driven off the internet and onto the streets.

wow I haven't seen that comment on every popular metal song/album ever. I bet his cat listened to Slayer too.

VAAGU VIKKANZU?!

Attached: 1559863146971.png (520x578, 252K)

Nobody had their freedom of speech violated ffs

>And free speech means nothing I suppose
Name one good argument for allowing free speech to fascists other than a vague utopian appeal to "everyone should just be able to openly speak their minds".
>Doesn't mean he doesn't make killer music.
I agree, but we are talking about his youtube channel, not about his musical output.
Not that user you replied to btw.

nordcucks OUT

Attached: CEA3E5CC-F942-4BDC-BD45-B83F39EEEA75.jpg (925x636, 216K)

Because that dehumanizes them. It silences a voice. And just how a racist can see they do wrong and change their ways so can a fascist but this method of silencing them doesn't solve the problem if anything it makes it worse and pushes them further into their ideology because it martyrs them.

Making youtube videos is an artistic expression just like making music and is a form of speech and self expression taking away their ability to do that is equal to violating their freedom of speech. Not to mention it doesn't change their mind it just makes them feel more passionate about their views.

Google is a private company, they can host whomever they want. I thought this was Capitalism boys, not some socialist dystopia?

The internet is supposed to be uncensored where people can do what they want.

Cyoot

"Durr hburr It's a private company they can do what they want!!"
No you dipshit, that's wrong. It's a monopoly. Google is the public square now despite being a private company due to the size of their platform. There is an old supreme court case that stated that factory-owned towns had to allow free speech on their public streets even though they owned the towns and wanted to shut down public complaints, because there was no other place for the inhabitants of those towns to exercise free speech while living there. Hence it doubled as the public square. Google and Facebook own such a vast majority of all social media that any non-shill who knows about jurisprudence can see the same principle should now apply to them and that doing things like insta-banning anyone who posts an Alex Jones link is unconsitutional and an atrocious precedent. Go back to watching Ben Shapiro or Young Turks or whatever it is you pollute your mind with.

BASED, bootlickers btfo and suck satans dick

>his "freedom of speech" doesn't matter
I'm so sick of hearing this. Everyone's freedom of speech matters. If you deny it for one person you deny it for everyone.

You hit the nail on the head. More people need to be hearing this.

It doesn't matter if they hear it. The people in question don't argue from principle, they argue from emotion. You can't debate someone out of an emotion. These people would be in the streets with picket signs if huge corporations like Google were silencing leftist voices but since they're silencing the opposition they pull this smug "they're a private company; they can do what they want" shit. Why? Because it feels good.

This

Then perhaps we just need to wait until leftist vocies start getting silenced. That much is inevitable, given enough time.

it's a privately owned platform, they can literally ban whoever they want for whatever. capitalism bro

No he's not you faggot

Attached: 1518514450035.jpg (396x382, 41K)

Good

Based intellectualbro

BASED

That doesn't mean it's not wrong

>taking life advice from an arsonist who was under house arrest for 20 years

Attached: 1559458683605.png (1679x943, 871K)

fuck this nazi, good riddance

>he didn't hurt nobody
lol

his YouTube channel was mostly centred on his ideology, not music
no one is denying that burzum is quality you brainlet

Actually based
You changed my mind desu

yeah

>not BAAGU

Attached: Kanna.png (300x300, 353K)

>user, that...doesn't make any sense. That just...wow. If if they WOULD do that, they couldn't. The government has all sorts of measures to make sure that wouldn't happen. What I'm trying to say is, we're basically all free and safe from this sort of thing. This isn't the 1800's, you know.

Attached: NPC.jpg (408x431, 13K)

Youtube partnering with the ADL to take down 'extremist' content... (((hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm)))

Attached: FB_IMG_1559882080622.jpg (1440x1440, 183K)

jews are white

schrodinger's jew

Pretty much

And communism is the endgame of capitalism.

>oh sorry the state owns you, you do what we want
>weren't you a huge supporter of private property and rule of law before?
>well you and your ideas are our property
>the law says so

It's so great until it's not on your side anymore. Wealth and ideology are not as connected as your "racists r dum and poor" studies might make you think. It swings both ways, back and forth. And around and around. The prejudice of the powerful finds a new target each time.

God damn if only there were laws that prevented that, and if only they were enforced

>create fake russiagate narrative
>create fake nazi narrative
>whip public into hysteria
>enact censorship

This

/pol/ was right again

Attached: D8U0Yg4VsAA3dTW.png (859x459, 80K)

You retard. If we actually applied this logic on a broader scale, the western world would be a mess. Freedom of speech is one of the fundamental building blocks of the free, western world. Nobody should be denied free speech no matter their background and actions.

Free speech doesn't let you say anything whenever you want. If you threaten to kill someone, that's illegal. Being a nazi, by definition means varg is threatening minority groups with implicit violence.

and a threat is considered a threat and there are already laws in place to deal with that. So that is seperate from free speech. How do you define nazi?

they usually are, especially when it comes to hebrew tricks

you can literally call anyone a nazi/racist with an opposing opinion nowadays, and instantly silence them

>How do you define nazi?
someone who isn't a farleft radical culturmarxist

someone who has the same views as 99% of your ancestors

That's wrong. Free speech do let you say whatever you want when you want. Only retards like Don Lemon says otherwise because that shit is just flat out wrong. Yeah, you can call in a bomb threat and get arrested, yeah you can say shit that gives you backlash from your community, but calling in a bomb threat is completely separate from the latter as it's a risk that cannot be ignored. Also, how do you define a nazi? Varg's content wasn't even promoting nazism, as far as I can recall and I was watching it relatively frequently

what makes ancestors right?

i can't urge people strongly enough to download important youtube videos and save them to an external hard drive. Anything conspiratorial or about deep, beyond the surface politics is fair game. Don't let it get lost forever

if they weren't kind of right, at least on a general averaged level, throughout the ages, you couldn't ask this dumbfuck question

you are ridiculously retarded i'll ask again what makes ancestors

t. actual retard

youtube.com/watch?v=lJWNUl26XSc

>First (((they))) came...

lol can't answer as i thought next!

already answered, you mongoloid spatic fuckwit
>next!
back to r*ddit

Attached: file.png (1360x1091, 1.77M)

lol can't answer as i thought next!

Why do you have a roof over your head, electricity, food and water, heating and cooling, entertainment, means to communicate, transportation, the ability to earn and spend money on resources you like, a political system that doesn't automatically physically enslave us from birth?

still doesn't prove why ancestors are right next!

>gets presented actual arguments
>instead of processing it, childishly repeats his infantile and idiotic post
BUT BRUH STILL DONT PROOF THO???? NEXT LOL!

you have actual fucking autism

all you prove is past people built the shit present people use next!

actually I proved with this stream of posts that you are literally incapable of understanding simple human thoughts you mouthbreating trogdolyte

I can think of one Norwegian edgelord who would disagree

still doesn't prove why ancestors are right next!

I've filtered "next!"

still doesn't prove why ancestors are right nxt!

So that's it? All roads lead to communism? What's the right path then?

you are right, they weren't right, they fucking made you happen, fuck ancestors, they clearly made a mistake letting you be

exactly!

glad we are on the same page about you being an annoying mistake, selfhating cuck-kun
now do us both a favour and kill yourself

exactly!

good
thats what he gets for burning down notre dame

Attached: 55829743_280251882905882_2067102198645650072_n.jpg (1080x1080, 148K)