This album triggers the incel with its empowerment of the modern woman. mutards btfo

lol you're absurd, it's just a zip of mp3 files

It's not empowerment if you're unwittingly playing into the pit hair fetishes of men and the only reason you get away with anything you want is because men would rather have sex with you than criticise you

Real female empowerment is being extremely sexual. Hairless, nubile, well kept. And then saying "no, fuck off".

>the pit hair fetishes of men
can i use this for the title of my novel?

seething incel detected

Attached: 59f5da3d0a165.image.jpg (400x299, 15K)

Fuck off

based frogposter

I am the onion knight up in those armpits

white bois will fuck anything, including women with armpit hair. this is why this shit is happening

I wish this was a real album

>pit hair fetishes of men
.....How did you know??!

it is, the artwork is different for the spotify, apple etc. and this is the vinyl. the mega link in this thread has this artwork for the vinyl dl that is not released yet. they changed the title from krua to kosuga. the review is somebody joking obviously but the album is real

i found kosuga on spotify. so you're saying it will be released on vinyl with the girl on the cover? do you know when? you are right that the files on spotify match the mp3's in the mega except the cover is different. i listened to a track and it's the same music. i would love to have a vinyl of it with her

nigga you think women have been shaving their pits since the dawn of time? you think monkeys shave?

maybe it is an issue with the photo license or they just didn't want the vinyl to be the same. it seems kosuga is a compilation, this is an official video for one of its tracks and it says it was previously on a 2018 ep before releasing in march on kosuga. the album is quite fantastic and unlike other albums has a lot of vocal tracks
youtube.com/watch?v=K_saZvb0CQQ

Am I the ONLY ONE that doesn't like it because it's an armpit and not the fact that it's hairy? Seriously armpits are nasty and I've never liked them, hairy or hairless. Go ahead call me a faggot but at the end of the day your fetish is no different than a foot fetish.

Attached: ....png (250x418, 121K)

for me i saw it as she is holding her hair up and it's a hair thing because her hair is cool. i didn't pay any mind to her fucking armpits, hair or no. look at her sexy hair on her head and her gorgeous face

No, it's just really not very good.

I do to have muscles jake frick off

>bengalfuel is a girl
Lol retard

Inagine the smell

According to their bio on Spotify, it's a girl and a guy, previously with a second guy

>at the end of the day your fetish is no different than a foot fetish.
Which is not a bad thing.

bangalful sexualizes and objectifies women to sell his music. its disgusting imo

What is sexual about this album cover? You're projecting. You must be a puritan Christian if you think a model posing is objectification. Utter repressed mong

i guess you are kinda right. it is the viewer sexualizing them not necessarily bengalful-- altho i tihnk he does choose to use traditionally sexuallized images of women with the purpose of thinking they will draw interest from ppl sexualizing the images. btw its fine and empowering for women to want to show or pose for the camera in exchange for money. it just seems like bangalful is attempting to attract a viewer base that sexualizes and objectifies the models in the pictures he uses

i guess my gripe is that yet again it seems like a white man is profiting off of female bodies is my gripe.

imagine her beautiful furry cooze.